Article published In:
Studies in LanguageVol. 30:3 (2006) ► pp.485–540
A cross-linguistic exploration of demonstratives in interaction
With particular reference to the context of word-formulation trouble
This study undertakes a cross-linguistic examination of several distinct usage types of demonstratives as “filler words” in the context where speakers encounter trouble in formulating a word during spontaneous speech production. The study documents the range of forms and functions of these demonstratives across diverse languages, and explores theoretical issues that arise from the empirical observation, including the question of why demonstratives, among all linguistic items, are utilized as a tool to deal with word-formulation trouble. By investigating the hitherto neglected usages of demonstratives in social interaction, our study contributes both to typological studies of demonstratives and to interactional studies of grammatical phenomena.
Cited by (34)
Cited by 34 other publications
Li, Xiaoting
2024. Managing progressivity and solidarity with nage shenme ‘that what’ in Mandarin interaction. In New Perspectives in Interactional Linguistic Research [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 36], ► pp. 220 ff. 
Chor, Winnie & Marvin Lam
2023. “It can do me1 (‘what’)?” — On the development of a Cantonese interrogative pronoun into a negative stance marker. Journal of Pragmatics 203 ► pp. 68 ff.
Rhee, Seongha
2023. Distance contrast of demonstrative-based discourse markers and speaker's stance in Korean. Journal of Pragmatics 215 ► pp. 4 ff.
Vallejos-Yopán, Rosa
2023. From demonstrative to filler:estein Amazonian Spanish and beyond. Linguistics 61:3 ► pp. 651 ff.
Farahani, Mehrdad Vasheghani & Mahmoud Elshahat Abdelghaffar Omar
2022. Book Review: Bernd Heine, Gunther Kaltenböck, Tania Kuteva and Haiping Long, The Rise of Discourse Markers. Discourse & Communication 16:6 ► pp. 735 ff.
Iwasaki, Shoichi & Parada Dechapratumwan
Kushida, Shuya & Makoto Hayashi
2022. Indicating Difficulty in Describing Something in Words: The Use of Koo in Word Searches in Japanese Talk-in-Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 55:1 ► pp. 59 ff.
Pyun, Danielle O. & Kyung-Eun Yoon
Seraku, Tohru, Sooyun Park & Yile Yu
2022. Grammatically unstable placeholders and morpho-syntactic remedies: evidence from East Asian languages. Folia Linguistica 56:2 ► pp. 389 ff.
Tanangkingsing, Michael
2022. Pragmatic functions of versatile unsa ‘what’ in Cebuano: From interrogative pronoun to placeholder to stance marker. Journal of Pragmatics 193 ► pp. 59 ff.
Tanangkingsing, Michael
2024. The marking of weak stance in Cebuano: The case of the versatile demonstrative kanάng. Journal of Pragmatics 230 ► pp. 89 ff.
Yap, Foong Ha & Huiling Xu
2022. Indefiniteness, interrogativity, and speaker stance: Insights from the extended uses of ‘what’-words in Chaozhou. Journal of Pragmatics 200 ► pp. 158 ff.
Hofstetter, Emily, Leelo Keevallik & Agnes Löfgren
2021. Suspending Syntax: Bodily Strain and Progressivity in Talk. Frontiers in Communication 6
Lin, Lin
2020. The Chinese Demonstratives. In The German Demonstratives [Peking University Linguistics Research, 2], ► pp. 117 ff.
Lin, Lin
2020. Introduction. In The German Demonstratives [Peking University Linguistics Research, 2], ► pp. 1 ff.
Morita, Emi & Tomoyo Takagi
2020. Interjectional use of demonstratives: Anoo and sonoo as resources for interaction in Japanese conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 169 ► pp. 120 ff.
Seraku, Tohru
2020. Placeholders in Yoron Ryukyuan: A view from Functional Discourse Grammar. Lingua 245 ► pp. 102852 ff.
Seraku, Tohru
2022. Interactional and rhetorical functions of placeholders: A relevance-theoretic approach. Journal of Pragmatics 187 ► pp. 118 ff.
Seraku, Tohru
2022. Referring to arbitrary entities with placeholders. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 32:3 ► pp. 426 ff.
Seraku, Tohru
2023. Creating placeholders on the fly: A metarepresentational approach. Journal of Pragmatics 210 ► pp. 109 ff.
Seraku, Tohru
2023. Grammars for placeholders: The dynamic turn. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 8:1
Seraku, Tohru
Seraku, Tohru
2024. Placeholders in crosslinguistic perspective: abilities, preferences, and usage motives. Linguistics
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization,
Serdobolskaya, Natalia, Maria Usacheva & Timofey Arkhangelskiy
2019. Grammaticalization of possessive markers in the Beserman dialect of Udmurt. In Possession in Languages of Europe and North and Central Asia [Studies in Language Companion Series, 206], ► pp. 291 ff.
Heine, Bernd, Gunther Kaltenböck, Tania Kuteva & Haiping Long
2017. Cooptation as a discourse strategy. Linguistics 55:4
Kaneyasu, Michiko & Shoichi Iwasaki
2017. Indexing ‘entrustment’: An analysis of the Japanese formulaic construction [N da yo N]. Discourse Studies 19:4 ► pp. 402 ff.
McMeekin, Abigail
2017. L1-L2 speaker interaction in a study abroad setting. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education 2:2 ► pp. 263 ff.
Shor, Leon
2016. Cognitive and interactional motivations for prosodic phrasing: A corpus-based analysis of the clause in spoken Israeli Hebrew. CHIMERA: Revista de Corpus de Lenguas Romances y Estudios Lingüísticos 3:2 ► pp. 325 ff.
Hayashi, Makoto & Stephanie Hyeri Kim
2015. Turn formats for other-initiated repair and their relation to trouble sources: Some observations from Japanese and Korean conversations. Journal of Pragmatics 87 ► pp. 198 ff.
Perera, Kaushalya & Susan Strauss
2015. High-focus and time-immediate indexicals: A study of Sinhala discourse markers me: ‘this’ and dæn ‘now’. Journal of Pragmatics 85 ► pp. 32 ff.
Hennoste, Tiit
2013. Pivot constructions in spoken Estonian. Journal of Pragmatics 54 ► pp. 73 ff.
Keevallik, Leelo
2011. Pro-Forms as Projective Devices in Interaction. Discourse Processes 48:6 ► pp. 404 ff.
[no author supplied]
2012. References. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ► pp. 741 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.