Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 31:2 (2007) ► pp.485497
References (14)
References
Blake, Barry J. 1994. Case. Cambridge: CUP [Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics].Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen and Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 2006. The resilient dative and other remarkable cases in Scandinavian vernaculars. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 591: 56–75.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew. 2005. Order of object and verb. In World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath; Matthew S. Dryer; David Gil; Bernard Comrie (eds.), 340–341. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, Janet D. 1983. Phrase Structure Parsing and the Island Constraints. Linguistics and Philosophy 61: 163–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gabelentz, Georg von der. 1891. Die Sprachwissenschaft: ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Geurts, Bart. 2000. Explaining Grammaticalization (the Standard Way). Linguistics 381: 781–798. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1979. On understanding grammar. New York NY: Academic Press. [Perspectives in neurolinguistics and psycholinguistics].Google Scholar
Haiman, John. 1983. Iconic and economic motivation. Language 591: 781–819. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1983. Word order universals. New York NY: Academic Press [Quantitative Analyses of Linguistic Structure 31].Google Scholar
1994. A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: CUP [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 731].Google Scholar
Lohse, B. Ms. Zero versus explicit marking in relative clauses.
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2000. On the reconstruction of ‘Proto-World’ word order. The evolutionary emergence of language: Social function and the origins of linguistic form, Chris Knight; Michael Studdert-Kennedy and James R. Hurford (eds.). Cambridge: CUP.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph. 1983. Relative clauses in educated spoken English. English Studies 381: 97–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yamamoto, Hideki. 2005. A historical view on areal distribution of word order around the world. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 581: 374–391.Google Scholar