Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 32:2 (2008) ► pp.466475
References (16)
References
Bybee, Joan, William Pagliuca & Revere D. Perkins. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fitneva, Stanka A. 2001. Epistemic marking and reliability judgements: Evidence from Bulgarian. Journal of Pragmatics 331: 401–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goossens, Louis. 1987. Modal shifts and predication types. Ins and Outs of Predication, Johan Van der Auwera & Louis Goossens (eds.), 21–37. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keesing, Roger. 1988. Melanesian Pidgin and the Oceanic substrate. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive meanings. The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge MA.: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R. 1986. Mood and modality. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1979. Modality and the English modals. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2001. Mood and modality. 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard Dasher. 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan & Vladimir A. Plungian. 1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 21: 79–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziegeler, Debra P. 2000. Hypothetical modality. Grammaticalisation in an L2 dialect. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003. On the generic origins of modality in English. English modality in context. Diachronic perspectives, David Hart (ed.), 33–69. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2006a. Omnitemporal will. Language Sciences 281: 76–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006b. Interfaces with English aspect. Diachronic and empirical studies. Amsterdam: John Benajmins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar