Previous studies on Preferred Argument Structure have suggested (Du Bois 1987, 2002) and accepted (e.g. Goldberg 2004) specific cognitive motivations for PAS, namely that the general restriction of lexical arguments and new referents to the S and O roles facilitates the conceptually onerous task of referent introduction. In this paper, conversation data from English and Portuguese are analyzed. The data are generally inconsistent with the putative cognitive motivations for PAS presented in the literature. They suggest instead that PAS is most likely epiphenomenal and due to basic semantic and pragmatic factors, for example the correlation between human referents and given/non-lexical arguments, and the correlation between human referents and the A role.
2020. An Inspection of Preferred Argument Structure in Mapudungun Narratives. International Journal of American Linguistics 86:1 ► pp. 59 ff.
Hodge, Gabrielle, Lindsay N. Ferrara & Benjamin D. Anible
2019. The semiotic diversity of doing reference in a deaf signed language. Journal of Pragmatics 143 ► pp. 33 ff.
Jiang, Xiangyu & Liang Chen
2019. Preferred argument structure in the narratives of Chinese-English bilinguals and their monolingual peers. International Journal of Bilingualism 23:5 ► pp. 873 ff.
Irwin, Patricia
2018. Existential unaccusativity and new discourse referents. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3:1
Zúñiga, Fernando
2018. The diachrony of morphosyntactic alignment. Language and Linguistics Compass 12:9
Brickell, Timothy C. & Stefan Schnell
2017. Do grammatical relations reflect information status? Reassessing Preferred Argument Structure theory against discourse data from Tondano. Linguistic Typology 21:1
Ariel, Mira, Elitzur Dattner, John W. Du Bois & Tal Linzen
2015. Not obligatory. Asia-Pacific Language Variation 1:2 ► pp. 128 ff.
Haig, Geoffrey, Stefan Schnell & Claudia Wegener
2011. Chapter 4. Comparing corpora from endangered language projects: Explorations in language typology based on original texts. In Documenting Endangered Languages, ► pp. 55 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.