Cover not available
Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 33:3 (2009) ► pp.738–748
Book review

Leonid Kulikov, Andrej Malchukov & Peter de Swart (eds.). Case, Valency and Transitivity. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2006. . [Studies in Language Companion Series, 77]. xx+503 pp. ISBN 90 272 3087 0

Reviewed by
| Institute of Slavic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences
Published online: 23 July 2009
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.33.3.09ark
References (20)
References
Aissen, Judith. 2003. Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21(3): 435–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blevins, James. 2001. Realization-based lexicalism. Review of A theory of predicates, F. Ackermann & G. Webelhuth. Journal of Linguistics 371: 355–365.Google Scholar
Blutner, Reinhard. 2000. Some aspects of optimality in natural language interpretation. Journal of Semantics 171: 189–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. The syntax of causative constructions: Cross-language similarities and divergences. Syntax and semantics, Vol. 6, The grammar of causative constructions, Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 261–312. San Diego CA: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1989. Language universals and linguistic typology. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
de Swart, Peter. 2007. Cross-linguistic variation in object marking. Utrecht: LOT Publications.Google Scholar
Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3): 547–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Sandra A. Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 561: 251–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kittilä, Seppo. 2006. Object-, animacy- and role-based strategies: A typology of object marking. Studies in Language 30(1): 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1995/1982. Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Lyutikova, Ekaterina; Sergey Tatevosov; Mikhail Ivanov; Anna Pazelskaja & Andrej Shluinskiy. 2006. Struktura sobytija i semantika glagola v karachajevo-balkarskom jazyke (Event structure and verb semantics in Karachay-Balkar). Moscow: IMLI.Google Scholar
Næss, Åshild. 2007. Prototypical transitivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins [Typological Studies in Language 721]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paris, Catherine. 1985. Relations actancielles et valence verbale en avar: Effacement de l’actant et mise au jour du sens. Actances 11: 135–153.Google Scholar
Sadler, Louisa & Andrew Spencer. 2001. Syntax as an exponent of morphological features. Yearbook of morphology 1995, Geert Booij & Yaap van Marle (eds.), 71–96. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Trommer, Jochen. 2003. Distributed optimality. Ph.D. diss., University of Potsdam.Google Scholar
Tsunoda, Tasaku. 1981. Split case-marking patterns in verb-types and tense/aspect/mood. Linguistics 19(5/6): 389–438.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1983. The semantics of case marking. Studies in Language 7(2): 247–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter. 2003. The force of lexical case: German and Icelandic compared. The nature of the word: Essays in honor of Paul Kiparsky, Kristin Hanson & Sharon Inkelas (eds.). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zaenen, Annie; Joan Maling & Höskuldur Thráinsson. 1985. Case and grammatical functions: The Icelandic passive. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31: 441–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zaliznyak, Andrej A. 1973. O ponimanii termina ‘padezh’ v lingvisticheskikh opisanijakh (On the interpretation of the term ‘case’ in linguistic descriptions). Problemy grammaticheskogo modelirovanija (Problems of grammatical models), Andrej A. Zaliznyak (ed.), 53–88. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar