Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 34:2 (2010) ► pp.453461
References (12)
References
Blevins, James P. & Juliette Blevins. 2009. Introduction: Analogy in grammar. Analogy in grammar: Form and acquisition, J. P. Blevins & J. Blevins (eds), 1–12. Oxford: OUP.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Juliette. 2004. Evolutionary phonology: The emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. 1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chantraine, Pierre. 1961. Morphologie Historique du Grec. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 1985. Competing motivations. Iconicity in syntax, J. Haiman (ed.), 343–65. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2006. Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42/11: 25–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2005. Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge: CUP.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. The changing languages of Europe. Oxford: OUP.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. J. 1992. A discourse perspective on syntactic change: Text-Building Strategies in Early Germanic. Reconstructing Languages and Cultures, Polomé, E. C. & Winter, W. (eds.), 217–238. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, David. 1999. The development of language: Acquisition, changes and evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Renzi, Lorenzo. 1993. L’articolo posposto rumeno in diacronia e in sincronia. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 38/44: 307–322.Google Scholar
Schaller, Helmut W. 1975. Die Balkansprachen. Eine Einführung in die Balkanphilologie. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar