Cover not available
Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 34:2 (2010) ► pp.471–481
Book review

Alan C. L. Yu. A Natural History of Infixation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. . [Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics, 15]. xii+264 pp. ISBN 978-0-19-927938-8

Reviewed by
| University of Munich
Published online: 13 August 2010
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.34.2.13sch
References (27)
References
Alekseev, Mikhael E. 1994a. Rutul. In: Rieks Smeets (ed.), The Indigenous Languages of the Caucasus, Vol. 41, 21, 213–258. Delmar, New York: Caravan Books.Google Scholar
1994b. Budukh. In: Rieks Smeets (ed.), The Indigenous Languages of the Caucasus, Vol. 41, 21, 259–296. Delmar, New York: Caravan Books.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. 1982. Where’s Morphology? Linguistic Inquiry 131, 571–612.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1978. The Grammar of Nominal Compounding. With Particular Reference to Danish, English and French. Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar
Bergsland, Knut. 1979. Lappische Grammatik mit Lesestücken, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette. 2004. Evolutionary Phonology: The emergence of Sound Patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouazza-Marouf, Gisela. 2002. Zeitdimensionalität im arabischen Verbum. Berlin: Weißensee Verlag.Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, Anne-Maria and Edwin Williams. 1987. On the Definition of Word. Cambridge. Mass.: MIT-Press.Google Scholar
Green, Thomas Michael. 1999. A Lexicographic Study of Ulwa. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institue of Technology.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice. 2002. Endoclitics and the Origins of Udi Morphosytax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ibragimov, Garun X. 1978. Rutul’skij jazyk. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
Kelepir, Meltem. 2000. To be or not to be Faithful. In A. Göksel and C. Kerslake (eds.). Studies on Turkish and Turkic Languages. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, Oxford, 11–18. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag. (Turcologica 461).Google Scholar
Kibrik, Alexandr E. et al. 1977. Opyt strukturnogo opisanija Arčinskogo jazyka. Tom I1: Leksika, fonetika. Tom II1: Taksonomičeskaja grammatika. Moskva: Izd. Moskovskogo Universiteta.Google Scholar
Kibrik, Alexandr E. 1994. Archi. In: Rieks Smeets (ed.), The Indigenous Languages of the Caucasus, Vol. 41, 21, 297–366. Delmar, New York: Caravan Books.Google Scholar
Lapointe, Steven. 1980. A theory of grammatical agreement. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Mass.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. and Alan Prince. 1993. Generalized Alignment. In: Laura J. Downing, T. Alan Hall and Renate Raffelsiefen (eds.), Paradigms in Phonological Theory, 170–210. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1993. The phonetics of sound change. In: Charles Jones (ed.), Historical Linguistics: Problems and Perspectives, 237–278. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Orgun, Cemil Orhan. 1996. Sign-based morphology and phonology with special attention to Optimality Theory. Unpublished PhD. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan and Paul Smolensky. 1993. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in generative Grammar. New Brunswick: Rutgers University and Boulder: University of Colorado.Google Scholar
Pokorny, Julius. 1969. Altirische Grammatik 2. Aufl. Berlin: de Gruyter [Sammlung Göschen Band 8961]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schulze, Wolfgang. 2004. Review article: Alice C. Harris. 2002. Endoclitics and the Origins of Udi Morphosyntax. Oxford. OUP. Studies in Language 281, 21: 419–441.Google Scholar
. Forthcoming. A Functional Grammar of Udi.
Strunk, Klaus. 1967. Nasalpräsentia und Aoriste. Heidelberg Winter.Google Scholar
Szemerényi, Oswald. 1989. Einführung in die vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft. 31. vollständig neu bearbeitete Auflage. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Talibov, Bukar B. 2007. Buduxskij jazyk. Moskva: Academia.Google Scholar
Tegey, Habibullah. 1977. The grammar of clitics: Evidence from Pashto and other languages. PhD thesis (Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois).Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1981. On the notions ‘lexically related’ and ‘head of a word’. Linguistic Inquiry, 121, 245–274.Google Scholar