Review published In:
Studies in LanguageVol. 34:4 (2010) ► pp.943–951
Book review
. On comitatives and related categories: A typological study with special focus on the languages of Europe [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, 33]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2006. and. Durch ‘mit’ eingeleitete präpositionale Objekte in den romanischen Sprachen [Diversitas Linguarum, 13]. Bochum: Universitätsverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer, 2007.
Reviewed by
References (6)
Arkhipov, Alexandre. 2009. Comitative as a cross-linguistically valid category. New challenges in typology. Transcending borders and refining the Distinctions, Patience Epps, & Alexandre Arkhipov (eds.), 223–46. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Lehmann, Christian & Yong-Min Shin. 2005. The functional domain of concomitance. A typological study of instrumental and comitative relations. Typological studies in participation (Studia Typologica 71), Christian Lehmann (ed.) 9–104. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. 
Seiler, Hansjakob. 1974. The principle of concomitance: instrumental, comitative and collective (with special reference to German). Foundations of Language 12/2: 215–247.
Seiler, Hansjakob and Waldfried Premper (eds.) 1991. Partizipation. Das sprachliche Erfassen von Sachverhalten. Tübingen: Günther Narr Verlag.
Stolz, Thomas. 1997. Some instruments are really good companions – some are not. On syncretism and the typology of instrumentals and comitatives. Theoretical Linguistics 23 (1/2): 113–200.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Uhlik, M. & A. Žele
2019. Slovenian comitative constructions with dual personal pronouns. Rhema :3, 2019 ► pp. 115 ff. 
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.