Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 35:1 (2011) ► pp.217227
References
Arnon, I., & N. Snider
2010More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory & Language, 621, 67–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ashby, F. G., & N. A. Perrin
1988Toward a unified theory of similarity and recognition. Psychological Review, 951, 124–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baerman, M., D. Brown, & G. Corbett
2005The syntax-morphology interface: A study of syncretism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, E., B. MacWhinney, C. Caselli, A. Devescovi, F. Natale & V. Venza
1984A crosslinguistic study of the development of sentence interpretation strategies. Child Development, 551, 341–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J., & D. Eddington
2006A usage-based approach to Spanish verbs of ‘becoming’. Language, 821, 323–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W., & K. T. Poole
2008Inferring universals from grammatical variation: Multidimensional scaling for typological analysis. Theoretical Linguistics, 341, 1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeJong, K., Y. -C. Hao, & H. Park
2009Evidence for featural units in the acquisition of speech production skills: Linguistic structure in foreign accent. Journal of Phonetics, 371, 357–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P., & P. Boersma
2004Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception research and phonological theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 261, 551–585. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kapatsinski, V.
2009aTesting theories of linguistic constituency with configural learning: The case of the English syllable. Language, 851, 248–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009bThe architecture of grammar in artificial grammar learning: Formal biases in the acquisition of morphophonology and the nature of the learning task. PhD Dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
1987Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: Chicago University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landauer, T. K., & S. T. Dumais
1997A solution to Plato’s problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 1041, 211–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liljencrants, L., & B. Lindblom
1972Numerical simulations of vowel quality systems. Language, 481, 839–862. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, Y., & J. Mielke
2008Discovering place and manner features. What can be learned from acoustic and articulatory data? Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 14.1: 241–254.Google Scholar
Maye, J., J. F. Werker, & L. Gerken
2002Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition, 821, B101–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mielke, J.
2008The emergence of distinctive features. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parubchenko, L. B.
2004От Любе к Саши. Причины ошибок в падежных окончаниях имен. Русская Cловесность, 21, 41–45.Google Scholar
Poplack, S.
1980The notion of the plural in Puerto Rico Spanish: Competing constraints on /s/ deletion. In W. Labov. ed. Locating language in time and space, pp. 55–67. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Trueswell, J. C., & L. R. Gleitman
2007Learning to parse and its implications for language acquisition. In G. Gaskell. ed. Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Tversky, A.
1977Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 841, 327–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zapf, J. A., & L. B. Smith
2008Meaning matters in children’s plural productions. Cognition, 1081, 466–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar