Cover not available
Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 35:1 (2011) ► pp.217–227
Book review

Anna Kibort & Greville G. Corbett (eds.). Features: Perspectives on a key notion in linguistics. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2010. xi+333 pp. ISBN 978-0-19-957774-3 $110

Reviewed by
| University of Oregon
Published online: 21 July 2011
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.35.1.06kap
References (21)
References
Arnon, I., & N. Snider. 2010. More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory & Language, 621, 67–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ashby, F. G., & N. A. Perrin. 1988. Toward a unified theory of similarity and recognition. Psychological Review, 951, 124–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baerman, M., D. Brown, & G. Corbett. 2005. The syntax-morphology interface: A study of syncretism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, E., B. MacWhinney, C. Caselli, A. Devescovi, F. Natale & V. Venza. 1984. A crosslinguistic study of the development of sentence interpretation strategies. Child Development, 551, 341–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J., & D. Eddington. 2006. A usage-based approach to Spanish verbs of ‘becoming’. Language, 821, 323–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W., & K. T. Poole. 2008. Inferring universals from grammatical variation: Multidimensional scaling for typological analysis. Theoretical Linguistics, 341, 1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeJong, K., Y. -C. Hao, & H. Park. 2009. Evidence for featural units in the acquisition of speech production skills: Linguistic structure in foreign accent. Journal of Phonetics, 371, 357–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P., & P. Boersma. 2004. Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception research and phonological theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 261, 551–585. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kapatsinski, V. 2009a. Testing theories of linguistic constituency with configural learning: The case of the English syllable. Language, 851, 248–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009b. The architecture of grammar in artificial grammar learning: Formal biases in the acquisition of morphophonology and the nature of the learning task. PhD Dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: Chicago University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landauer, T. K., & S. T. Dumais. 1997. A solution to Plato’s problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 1041, 211–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liljencrants, L., & B. Lindblom. 1972. Numerical simulations of vowel quality systems. Language, 481, 839–862. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, Y., & J. Mielke. 2008. Discovering place and manner features. What can be learned from acoustic and articulatory data? Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 14.1: 241–254.Google Scholar
Maye, J., J. F. Werker, & L. Gerken. 2002. Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition, 821, B101–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mielke, J. 2008. The emergence of distinctive features. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parubchenko, L. B. 2004. От Любе к Саши. Причины ошибок в падежных окончаниях имен. Русская Cловесность, 21, 41–45.Google Scholar
Poplack, S. 1980. The notion of the plural in Puerto Rico Spanish: Competing constraints on /s/ deletion. In W. Labov. ed. Locating language in time and space, pp. 55–67. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Trueswell, J. C., & L. R. Gleitman. 2007. Learning to parse and its implications for language acquisition. In G. Gaskell. ed. Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Tversky, A. 1977. Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 841, 327–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zapf, J. A., & L. B. Smith. 2008. Meaning matters in children’s plural productions. Cognition, 1081, 466–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar