Cover not available
Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 35:4 (2011) ► pp.960–969
Book review

Gregory D. S. Anderson (ed.). The Munda Languages. London/New York: Routledge, 2008. . [Routledge Language Family Series]. xxi + 783 pp. ISBN 978-0-415-32890-6

Reviewed by
| University of Oregon
Published online: 10 January 2012
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.35.4.10puc
References (28)
References
Anderson, G. D. S. 1999. A new classification of the Munda languages: Evidence from comparative verb morphology, Paper presented at 209th meeting of the American Oriental Society, Baltimore, MD.
2001. A new classification of Munda: Evidence from comparative verb morphology. Indian Linguistics, 621:27–42.Google Scholar
2006. Auxiliary verb constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A. 1905. English-Santali; index to Santali-English dictionary. Pokhuria: Santal Mission Press.Google Scholar
Cole, F. T. 1906. Santali primer. Benegaria: Santal Mission Press.Google Scholar
Diffloth, G. 1989. Proto-Austroasiatic creaky voice. Mon-Khmer Studies, XV1: 139–154.Google Scholar
2005. The contribution of linguistic palaeontology to the homeland of Austro-asiatic. The peopling of East Asia: putting together archaeology, linguistics and genetics. Laurent Sagart, R. Blench, and Alicia Sanchez-Mazas (eds.), 128–131. London: Routledge Curzon. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, A. 1994. Santali: A look into Santal morphology. New Delhi: Gyan Publishing House.Google Scholar
Gordon, R. (ed.) 2005. Ethnologue. 15th edition. Dallas: SIL International.Google Scholar
Hoffman, J. 1903. Mundari grammar. Calcutta: Bengal Secretariat Press.Google Scholar
1909. A Mundari grammar with exercises. Calcutta: Bengal Secretariat Press.Google Scholar
1930–1950. Encyclopedia Mundarica. 151 volumes, Patna: Government Superintendent Printing.Google Scholar
Hook, P. 1991. The compound verb in Munda: An areal overview. Language Sciences, 13(2):181–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M. Paul (ed.), 2009. Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 16th edition. Dallas: SIL InternationalGoogle Scholar
Matson, D. M. 1964. A grammatical sketch of Juang. PhD diss, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
Nagajara, K. S. 1999. Korku language: Grammar, texts and vocabulary. Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Peterson, J. 2006. Kharia Texts. (vol. 2) Glossed, translated and annotated. <[URL]>
2009. ‘Kharia-English Lexicon’. Himalayan Linguistics Archive 5. i–xv, 1–212.Google Scholar
2010. ‘A grammar of Kharia: A South Munda language’. Brill’s Studies in South and Southwest Asian Languages.Google Scholar
Prasad, N. 1961. Land and people of tribal Bihar. Ranchi: Bihar Tribal Institute.Google Scholar
Rajan, F. Herold & Jamuna Rajan. 2001. Grammar write-up of Gutob-Gadaba. Lamtaput, Orissa: Asha Kiran Society.Google Scholar
Ramamurti, G. V. 1931. A manual of the So:ra: (or Savara) language. Madras: Government Press.Google Scholar
Rau, F. 2009. Glottal constriction in Gorum. Paper presented at The Fourth International Conference on Austroasiatic Linguistics, October 29–30, 2009.
van Driem, G. 2007. Austroasiatic phylogeny and the Austroasiatic homeland in light of recent population genetic studies, Mon-Khmer Studies, 371: 1–14.Google Scholar
Zide, N. H. 1965. Gutob-Remo vocalism and glottalised vowels in Proto-Munda. Lingua, 141:43–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zide, N. H. & D. L. Stampe. 1968. The position of Kharia-Juang in the Munda family. Studies in Indian Linguistics, B. Krishnamurti (ed.) [Professor M. B. Emeneau’s śaśipurti. volume], Poona: Centre of Advanced Study in Linguistics, Deccan College, 370–377.Google Scholar
Zide, N. H. 1969. Munda and non-Munda Austroasiatic languages. Current trends in Linguistics, Thomas Sebeok (ed.), 51:411–430. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1996. On Nihali. Mother Tongue: Journal of the Association for the Study of Language in Prehistory, pp 93–100.Google Scholar