Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 36:1 (2012) ► pp.193201
References (11)
References
Aikhenvald, A., and R. M. W. Dixon. eds. 2006. Serial verb constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W., and A. Aikhenvald. eds. 2006. Complementation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, W., and R. D. Van Valin. 1984. Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. 1995. The converb as a cross-linguistically valid category. In Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective, eds. Martin Haspelmath, and Ekkehard König. 1–55. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M., and E. König. eds. 1995. Converbs in crosslinguistic perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. ed. 2004. Coordinating constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Lambrecht, K. 1994. Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, C. 1988. Towards a typology of clause linkage. In Clause combining in grammar and discourse, eds. John Haiman, and Sandra A. Thompson. 181–226. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nedjalkov, V. 1995. Some typological parameters of converbs. In Converbs in crosslinguistic perspective, eds. Martin Haspelmath, and Ekkehard König. 97–136. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Grammatical categories in Australian languages, ed. Robert M. W. Dixon. 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, J. ed. 1998. Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, R. D. 2005. Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar