Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 37:2 (2013) ► pp.454462
References (19)
References
Alonso de la Fuente, José Andrés. 2011. Tense, voice and aktionsart in Tungusic  – another case of «analysis to synthesis»? Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Benzing, Johannes. 1955. Die tungusischen Sprachen: Versuch einer vergleichenden Grammatik. (Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, Abhandlungen der geistes- und sozialwissenschaftlichen Klasse, Jahrgang 1955, Nr. 111) Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
Chen, Pan 陈潘. 2011. Jin wunian tonggusiyu minzu shi yanjiu zongshu 近五年通古斯语族民族史研究综述. Journal of Social Science of Jiamusi University 29(5). 94–97.Google Scholar
Cincius, Vera Ivanovna. 1949. Sravnitel’naja grammatika tunguso-man’čžurskix jazykov. Leningrad: Učpedgiz.Google Scholar
Doerfer, Gerhard. 1978. Classification problems of Tungus. In: Gerhard Doerfer & Michael Weiers (eds.), Tungusica, Band 1– Beiträge zur Nordasiatischen Kulturgeschichte, 1–26. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
. 1978a. Urtungusisch *ö. Tungusica, Band 1. In: Gerhard Doerfer & Michael Weiers (eds.), Beiträge zur Nordasiatischen Kulturgeschichte, 66–116. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
. 1985. Mongolo-Tungusica. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Gabelentz, Hans Conon von der. 1861. Über das Passivum  – Eine sprachvergleichende Abhandlung. Abhandlungen der Königlich Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften 81. 449–546.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, Matthew S. Dryer, Davil Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds.). 2005. The world Atlas of language structures. With the collaboration of Hans-Jörg Bibiko, Hagen Jung, & Claudia Schmidt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1957. Shifters, verbal categories and the Russian verb. In Selected writings vol. 2. Word and language, 130–147. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Janhunen, Juha. 2005. Tungusic: An endangered language family in Northeast Asia. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 1731. 37–54.Google Scholar
Jettmar, Karl. 1952. Zum Problem der tungusischen Urheimat. In: Wilhelm Koppers (ed.), Kultur und Sprache, 484–511. Wien: Herold.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej. 2010. “Quirky” case: Rare phenomena in case-marking and their implications for a theory of typological distributions. In: Jan Wohlgemuth & Michael Cysouw (eds.), Rethinking universals: How rarities affect linguistic theory, 139–168. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Roy Andrew. 1994. On the original geographic distribution of the Tungus languages. In: Howard I. Aronson. (ed.), Non-Slavic languages of the USSR  – papers from the fourth conference, 272–297. Columbus: Slavica Publishers.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Igor V. 1993. Causative-passive polysemy of verbal suffixes. In: Ullrich J. Lueders (ed.), Languages of the world 11, 4–31. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina & Maria Tolskaya. 2001. A grammar of Udihe. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vovin, Alexander. 2008. Tungusic languages. In: Keith Brown & Sarah Ogilvie (eds.), Concise encyclopedia of languages of the world, 1103–1005. Amsterdam and Boston: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Whaley, Lindsay, Lenore A. Grenoble & Fengxiang Li. 1999. Revisiting Tungusic classification from the bottom up: A comparison of Evenki and Oroqen. Language 751. 286–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zakharov, Ivan. 2010 [1879]. A grammar of Manchu. [Languages of Asia Classic Texts, Vol. 11] Folkestone: Global Oriental. [Original: Zakharov, Ivan. 1879. Grammatika man’čžurskogo jazyka. St. Petersburg: Akademia Nauk.] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Hölzl, Andreas
2015. A typology of negation in Tungusic. Studies in Language 39:1  pp. 118 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.