Cover not available
Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 37:2 (2013) ► pp.463–472
Book review

Kasper Boye. Epistemic Meaning: A crosslinguistic and functionalcognitive study. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton, 2012. . [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, 43]. xvii + 373 pp. ISBN 978 3 11 020438 4

Reviewed by
| Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz
Published online: 20 June 2013
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.37.2.10wie
References (20)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2003. Evidentiality in typological perspective. In: Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Richard M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality, 1–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. Evidentiality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Akatsuka, Noriko. 1985. Conditionals and the epistemic scale. Language 61(3). 625–639. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Lloyd B. 1986. Evidentials, paths of change, and mental maps: Typologically regular asymmetries. In: Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 273–312. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper. 2010a. Evidence for what? Evidentiality and scope. Database on evidentiality markers in European languages. Special issue of: Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 63(4). 290–307.Google Scholar
. 2010b. Reference and clausal perception-verb complements. Linguistics 48(2). 391–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder. 2009. Evidentiality: Linguistic categories and grammaticalization. Evidentiality in language and cognition. Special issue of: Functions of Language 16(1). 9–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A crosslinguistic perspective. Oxford etc.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cornillie, Bert. 2009. Evidentiality and epistemic modality: On the close relationship between two different categories. Evidentiality in language and cognition. Special issue of: Functions of Language 16(1). 44–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William. 2003. Typology and universals, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambrdige University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, T. 1982. Evidentiality and epistemic space. Studies in Language 6(1). 23–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krause, Marion. 2007. Epistemische Modalität. Zur Interaktion lexikalischer und prosodischer Marker. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Frank Robert. 2001. Mood and modality, 2nd edn. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pietrandrea, Paola. 2005. Epistemic modality. Functional properties and the Italian system. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plungian, Vladimir A. 2001. The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space. Journal of Pragmatics 331. 349–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie & Karin Aijmer. 2007. The semantic field of modal certainty: A corpus based study of English adverbs. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van der Auwera, Johan & Vladimir A. Plungian. 1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 21. 79–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiemer, Björn. 2005. Conceptual affinities and diachronic relationships between epistemic, inferential and quotative functions (preliminary observations on lexical markers in Russian, Polish and Lithuanian). In: Björn Hansen & Petr Karlík (eds.), Modality in Slavonic languages. New perspectives, 107–131. München: Sagner.Google Scholar
Wiemer, Björn & Katerina Stathi. 2010. The database of evidential markers on European languages: A bird’s eye view of the conception of the data base (the template and problems hidden beneath it). Database on evidentiality markers in European languages. Special issue of: Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 63(4). 275–289.Google Scholar