Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 38:1 (2014) ► pp.220233
References (46)
References
Almeida, Antonio & Angelika Braun. 1986. “Richtig” und “Falsch” in Phonetischer Transkription. Vorschläge zum Vergleich von Transkriptionen mit Beispielen aus deutschen Dialekten. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik LIII (2). 158–172.Google Scholar
Bakker, Dik, André Müller, Viveka Velupillai, Søren Wichmann, Cecil H. Brown, Pamela Brown, Dmitry Egorov, Robert Mailhammer, Anthony Grant & Eric W. Holman. 2009. Adding typology to lexicostatistics: A combined approach to language classification. Linguistic Typology 13(1). 169–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borin, Lars. 2013. For better or for worse? Going beyond short word lists in computational studies of language diversity. Paper presented at Language Diversity Congress: Computational Issues in Studying Language Diversity: Storage, Analysis and Inference. July 18–20, Groningen, The Netherlands. [URL]
Brown, Cecil H., Charles R. Clement, Patience Epps, Eike Luedeling & Søren Wichmann. 2013. The paleobiolinguistics of domesticated manioc (Manihot esculenta). Ethnobiology Letters 41. 61–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Connolly, John H. 1997. Quantifying target-realization differences. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 111. 267–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Jared. 1997. Guns, germs and steel: The fates of human societies. London: Cape.Google Scholar
Heggarty, Paul. 2005. Enigmas en el origen de las lenguas andinas: Aplicando nuevas técnicas a las incógnitas por resolver. Revista Andina 401. 9–57.Google Scholar
. 2011. Enterrando el esqueleto quechumara. In Willem Adelaar, Pilar Valenzuela & Roverto Zariquiey (eds.), Estudios En Lenguas Andinas y Amazónicas. En Homenage a Rodolfo Cerrón-Palomino, 147–179. Lima: Fondo Editorial de la PUCP.Google Scholar
Hammarström, Harald. 2007. Handbook of descriptive language knowledge: A full-scale reference guide for typologists. München: Lincom.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds.). 2008. The world atlas of language structures online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Uri Tadmor. 2009a. Loanwords in the world’s languages: A comparative handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin and Uri Tadmor. 2009b. World loanword database. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. [URL]. DOI logo
Haynie, Hannah J. 2012. Topics in the history and geography of California languages. PhD dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
2013. Interpreting spatial patterns in linguistic data. Paper presented at Language Diversity Congress: Computational Issues in Studying Language Diversity: Storage, Analysis and Inference. July 18–20, Groningen, The Netherlands. [URL]
Heeringa, Wilbert. 2004. Measuring dialect pronunciation differences using Levenshtein distance. PhD dissertation. University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Huson, Daniel & David Bryant. 2006. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23(2). 254–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gray, Russell D. & Quentin D. Atkinson. 2003. Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin. Nature 426(6965). 435–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenhill, Simon. Quantifying the patterns of language diversification. Paper presented at Language Diversity Congress: Computational Issues in Studying Language Diversity: Storage, Analysis and Inference. July 18–20, Groningen, The Netherlands. [URL]
Kessler, Brett. 1995. Computational dialectology in Irish Gaelic. Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 60–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koonin, Eugene V. 2005. Orthologs, paralogs, and evolutionary genomics. Annual Review of Genetics 391: 309–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levenshtein, Vladimir. 1965. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions and reversals. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, 1631: 845–848.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. Paul (ed.). 2009. Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 16th edn. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. [URL]
List, Johann-Mattis. 2012a. Sequence comparison in historical linguistics. PhD dissertation. Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
. 2012b. SCA: Phonetic alignment based on sound classes. In Daniel Lassiter & Marija Slavkovik (eds.). New directions in logic, language, and computation, 32–51, Berlin & Heidelber: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012c. Multiple sequence alignment in historical linguistics: A sound class based approach. Proceedings of ConSOLE XIX, 241–260.Google Scholar
Moran, Steven & Jelena Prokić. 2013. Investigating the Relatedness of the Endangered Dogon Languages. Literary and Linguistic Computing 28(4) 676–691. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson-Sathi, Shijulal, Johann-Mattis List, Hans Geisler, Heiner Fangerau, Russel D. Gray, William Martin & Tal Dagan. 2011. Networks uncover hidden lexical borrowing in Indo-European language evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278(1713). 1794–1803. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nerbonne, John, Wilbert Heeringa & Peter Kleiweg. 1999. Edit distance and dialect proximity. Time Warps, String Edits and Macromolecules: The Theory and Practice of Sequence Comparison, 2nd edn. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna & Tandy Warnow. 2008. Tutorial on computational linguistic phylogeny. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(5). 760–820. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nordhoff, Sebastian & Harald Hammarström. 2011. Glottolog/Langdoc: Defining dialects, languages, and language families as collections of resources. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Linked Science 2011. [URL]
Petroni, Filippo & Maurizio Serva. 2008. Language distance and tree reconstruction. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 81. P08012.Google Scholar
Prokić, Jelena & Steven Moran. 2013a. Black box approaches to genealogical classification and their shortcomings. In Lars Borin & Anju Saxena (eds.), Comparing approaches to measuring linguistic differences. Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013b. Diversity of language sources: Challenges in digitization, interoperation and analysis. Paper presented at Language Diversity Congress: Computational Issues in Studying Language Diversity: Storage, Analysis and Inference. July 18–20, Groningen, The Netherlands. [URL]
Rama, Taraka. 2013. Comparative study of string similarity and vector similarity measures for Bulgarian dialect classification. Poster presented at Language Diversity Congress: Computational Issues in Studying Language Diversity: Storage, Analysis and Inference. July 18–20, Groningen, The Netherlands. [URL]
Ringe, Don, Tandy Warnow & Ann Taylor. 2002. Indo-European and computational cladistics. Transactions of the Philological Society 100(1): 59–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saitou, Naruya & Masatoshi Nei. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 4(4). 406–425.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1916. Time perspective in aboriginal American culture, a study in method. Anthropological Series. Ottawa: Government Printing Bureau. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serva, Maurizio, Filippo Petroni, Dima Volchenkov & Søren Wichmann. 2011. Dialects of Malagasy and the peopling of Madagascar. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 9(66). 54–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sneath, Peter H. A. & Robert R. Sokal. 1973. Numerical taxonomy. The principles and practice of numerical classification.Google Scholar
Sokal, Robert R. & Charles D. Michener. 1958. A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Swadesh, Morris. 1948. Sociologic notes on obsolescent languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 141. 226–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1950. Salish internal relationships. International Journal of American Linguistics 161. 157–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1963. A punchcard system of cognate hunting. International Journal of American Linguistics 201. 283–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vavilov, Nikolai I. 1926. Centers of origin of cultivated plants. Trudi po Prikl. Bot. genet. Selek. (Bulletin of Applied Botany and Genetics) 161. 139–248.Google Scholar
Warnow, Tandy. 2009. Phylogeny reconstruction methods in linguistics. Paper (keynote address) Presented at The Swadesh Centenary Conference, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, January 17–18, 2009.
Wichmann, Søren & Matthias Urban. 2012. Toward an automated classification of Englishes. In Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of english, 676–686. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar