Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 38:2 (2014) ► pp.421426
References (10)
References
DeLancey, Scott. 1981. An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns. Language 571:626–657. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1983. Agentivity and causation: Data from Newari. In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 12–13 February 1983, Amy Dahlstrom, Claudia Brugman, Monica Macaulay, Inese Cirkulus, Michele Emanation, Donna Sakima & Raquel Teixeura (eds), 54–63. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
. 1985. Lhasa Tibetan evidentials and the semantics of causation. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, February 16–18, 1985. Mary Niepokuj, Mary VanClay, Vassiliki Nikiforidou & Deborah Feder (eds), 65–72. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
. 1986. Evidentiality and volitionality in Tibetan. In Evidentiality: The linguistic Coding of Epistemology, Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds), 203–213. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
. 1990. Ergativity and the cognitive model of event structure in Lhasa Tibetan. Cognitive Linguistics 1(3): 289–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. The origins of verb serialization in modern Tibetan. Studies in Language 151: 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1992. The historical origin of the conjunct-disjunct distinction in Tibeto-Burman. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 251: 289–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Linguistic Society of America Summer Institute. Santa Barbara Lectures on Functional Syntax. ([URL])
. 2004. Grammaticalization from syntax to morphology. In Morphologie: Ein internationals Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung, Geert E. Booij Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan (eds), 1590–1599. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2011. Finite structures from clausal nominalization in Tibeto-Burman. In Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives, Vol. 1: Sino-Tibetan and Iranian Languages [Typological Studies in Language 961], Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds), 343–360. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar