Semantic roles and verbless constructions
A Finnish challenge for verb-centered approaches
Katja Västi | University of Oulu & University of Helsinki
Semantic roles constitute one of the most notorious notions in linguistics because they have been defined in numerous ways depending on the author’s theoretical framework and goals. Typically these definitions are somehow, more or less explicitly, based on verbs and their properties. In this paper, semantic roles are discussed from a completely different perspective; we examine genuinely verbless constructions attested in Finnish newspaper headlines. The paper addresses three main questions: First, what kinds of constructions do not need a finite verb to express dynamic events? Second, what kind of information remains unconceptualized in verbless constructions? And finally, what are semantic roles based on if there is no verb? The goal of the paper is to show that verbs are not needed to define semantic roles, as an array of semantic roles can be recognized even in constructions lacking a verb.
References (54)
Åkermalm, Åke. 1965. Rubriksvenska och andra studier (Skrifter utgivna av Modersmålslärarnas Förening 100). Falköping: Gleerups.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Conon, Lars. 1973. Rubrikspråket på Dagens Nyheters förstasidor I–II (Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Studia Philologiae Scandinavicae Upsaliensia 8). Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, William. 1991. Syntactic categories and grammatical relations: The cognitive organization of information. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DeLancey, Scott. 1991. Event construal and case role assignment. Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS). 338–353. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dixon, R.M.W. 2010. Basic Linguistic Theory: Volume 1 methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dowty, David. 1989. On the semantic content of the notion ‘thematic role’. In Gennaro Chierchia, Barbara H. Partee & Raymond Turner (eds.), Properties, types and meaning II: Semantic issues (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy), 69–129. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3). 547–619. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. The case for case. In Emmon Bach & Robert T. Harms (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory, 1–88. London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, Charles J. 1970. The grammar of hitting and breaking
. In Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, 120–133. Waltham: Ginn.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fried, Mirjam & Jan-Ola Östman. 2004. Construction Grammar: A thumbnail sketch. In Mirjam Fried & Jan-Ola Östman (eds.), Construction Grammar in a cross-language perspective (Constructional Approaches to Language 2), 11–86. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure (Cognitive Theory of Language and Culture). Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gruber, Jeffrey. 1965. Studies in lexical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. A grammar of Lezgian (Mouton Grammar Library 9). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. 1991. Syntaktiset rakenteet kertomuksen jäsennyksen osoittimina. Virittäjä 95(1). 33–47.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huumo, Tuomas. 2003. Incremental existence: The world according to the Finnish existential sentence. Linguistics 41(3). 461–493. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic interpretation in Generative Grammar (Current Studies in Linguistics 2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, Ray. 1976. Toward an explanatory semantic representation. Linguistic Inquiry 71. 89–150.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kittilä, Seppo. 2005. Remarks on involuntary agent constructions. Word 56(3). 381–419. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kittilä, Seppo. 2008. Animacy effects on Differential Goal Marking. Linguistic Typology 12(2). 245–268. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kopotev, Mikhail. 2007a. What a difference a verb makes! Russian and Finnish verbless sentences. In Marja Nenonen & Sinikka Niemi (eds.), Collocations and idioms 1: Papers from the First Nordic Conference on Syntactic Freezes, Joensuu, May 19-20, 2006 (Studies in Languages, University of Joensuu, vol. 41), 177–192. Joensuu: Joensuu University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kopotev, Mikhail. 2007b. Where Russian syntactic zeros start: Approaching Finnish? In Juhani Nuorluoto (ed.), Topics on the ethnic, linguistic and cultural making of the Russian North (Slavica Helsingiensia 32), 116–137. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lazard, Gilbert. 1998. Actancy. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leino, Pentti. 1993. Polysemia – kielen moniselitteisyys: Suomen kielen kognitiivista kielioppia 1 (Kieli 7). Helsingin yliopiston suomen kielen laitos.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leino, Pentti. 2001. Verbit, konstruktiot ja lausetyypit. In Pentti Leino, Ilona Herlin, Suvi Honkanen, Lari Kotilainen, Jaakko Leino & Maija Vilkkumaa, Roolit ja rakenteet: Henkilöviitteinen allatiivi Biblian verbikonstruktioissa (Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seuran Toimituksia 813), 11–66. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moor, Marianne. 1985. Studien zum lesgischen Verb. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mårdh, Ingrid. 1980. Headlinese: On the grammar of English frontpage headlines (Lund Studies in English 58). Lund: CWK Gleerup.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Næss, Åshild. 2003. Transitivity: From semantics to structure. Nijmegen: University of Nijmegen dissertation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Næss, Åshild. 2007. Prototypical transitivity (Typological Studies in Language 72). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2010. On comparative concepts and descriptive categories: A reply to Haspelmath. Language 86(3). 688–695. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Payne, Thomas E. 1997. Describing morphosyntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin. 2008. The English dative alternation: The case for verb sensitivity. Journal of Linguistics 441. 129–167. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reinhart, Tanya. 1996. Syntactic effects of lexical operations: Reflexives and unaccusatives. OTS Working Papers in Linguistics. University of Utrecht: Utrecht Institute of Linguistics.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reinhart, Tanya. 2000. The theta system: Syntactic realization of verbal concepts. OTS Working Papers in Linguistics. University of Utrecht: Utrecht Institute of Linguistics.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reinhart, Tanya. 2001. Experiencing derivations. In Rachel Hastings, Brendan Jackson & Zsofia Zvolenszky (eds.), Semantic and Linguistic Theory (SALT 11), 365–387. Ithaca: Cornell Linguistics Circle Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reinhart, Tanya. 2002. The theta system – an overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28(3). 229–290.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rice, Sally & Kaori Kabata. 2007. Crosslinguistic grammaticalization patterns of the allative. Linguistic Typology 11(3). 451–514. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rozwadowska, Bożena. 1988. Thematic restrictions on derived nominals. In Wendy Wilkins (ed.), Syntax and semantics 21: Thematic relations, 147–165. New York: Academic Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rozwadowska, Bożena. 1989. Are thematic relations discrete? In Roberta Corrigan, Fred Eckman & Michael Noonan (eds.), Linguistic categorization (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 61), 115–130. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie. 1981. The grammar of headlines in The Times 1870–1970 (Verhandelingen van de Koninklijke Academie voor Wetenschappen, Letteren en Schone Kunsten van België 95). Brussels: Paleis der Academiën.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Siro, Paavo. 1964. Suomen kielen lauseoppi. Helsinki: Tietosanakirja.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Straumann, Heinrich. 1935. Newspaper headlines: A study in linguistic method. London: George Allen & Unwin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vahtera, Ralf. 2009. Otsikkorakenteita: Kontrastiivinen tutkimus suomen- ja ruotsinkielisten sanomalehtien syntaktis-semanttisista otsikkotyypeistä (Acta Wasaensia No 209, Kielitiede 41). Vaasa: University of Vaasa.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. & Randy J. LaPolla. 1997. Syntax: Structure, meaning and function (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Västi, Katja. 2011b. Mihin verbittömien konstruktioiden merkitystyypit perustuvat? Skemaattiset ja polyseemiset tapahtumanilmaukset. Sananjalka 531. 34–60. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Västi, Katja. 2012. Elävä lähde: Alkuasemaisen ablatiivin merkitystyypit verbittömässä konstruktiossa. Virittäjä 116(1). 67–97.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Pirinen, Veera, Soile Loukusa, Kurt Eggers, Jari Sivonen, Leena Mäkinen, Laura Mämmelä, Hanna Ebeling, Marja-Leena Mattila & Tuula Hurtig
2024.
Could linguistic and cognitive factors, degree of autistic traits and sex predict speech disfluencies in autistic young adults and controls?.
Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics ► pp. 1 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Shin, Gyu-Ho & Hyunwoo Kim
Shin, Gyu-Ho
2020.
People also avoid repetition in sentence comprehension: Evidence from multiple postposition constructions in Korean.
Linguistics Vanguard 6:1
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.