Article published In:
Advances in research on semantic roles
Edited by Seppo Kittilä and Fernando Zúñiga
[Studies in Language 38:3] 2014
► pp. 543565
References
Blake, Barry
1994Case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen, Nicholas Enfield, James Essegbey, Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Sotaro Kita, Friederike Lüpke & Felix Ameka
2007Principles of event segmentation in language: The case of motion events. Language 83(3). 495–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen & Eric Pederson
(eds.) 2011Event representation in language and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Censabella, Marisa
2010Beneficiaries and recipients in Toba (Guaycurú). In Fernando Zúñiga & Seppo Kittilä (eds.), Benefactives and malefactives: Typological perspectives and case studies, 185–201. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles
2004Circumstance concepts. In G. Booij, et al. (eds.), Morphology: An international handbook on inflection and word-formation, Vol. 21, 1117–1130. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Frawley, William
1992Linguistic semantics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hole, Daniel
2008Dativ, Bindung und Diathese. Berlin: Humboldt University Habilitation thesis.Google Scholar
Kittilä, Seppo
2005Recipient-prominence vs. beneficiary-prominence. Linguistic Typology 9(2). 269–297.Google Scholar
2010Beneficiary coding in Finnish. In Fernando Zúñiga & Seppo Kittilä (eds.), Benefactives and malefactives: Typological perspectives and case studies, 245–270. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marten, Lutz & Nancy Kula
2011Benefactive and substitutive applicatives in Bemba. Ms., SOAS and University of Essex.
Palmer, F.R
1994Grammatical roles and relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penny, Ralph
2002A history of the Spanish language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peterson, David
2007Applicative constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Platt, J
1971Grammatical form and grammatical meaning: A tagmemic view of Fillmore’s deep structure case concepts. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Rapold, Christian
2010Beneficiary and other roles of the dative in Tashelhiyt. In Fernando Zúñiga & Seppo Kittilä (eds.), Benefactives and malefactives: Typological perspectives and case studies, 351–376. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rice, Sally & Kaori Kabata
2007Crosslinguistic grammaticalization patterns of the allative. Linguistic Typology 11(3). 451–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sadler, Wesley
1964Untangled Bemba: A language of Northern Rhodesia, Central Africa. Kitwe: The United Church of Central Africa in Rhodesia.Google Scholar
Schmidtke-Bode, Karsten
2010The roles of benefactives and related notions in the typology of purpose clauses. In Fernando Zúñiga & Seppo Kittilä (eds.), Benefactives and malefactives: Typological perspectives and case studies, 121–146. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1996Applicatives and benefactives: A cognitive account. In M. Shibatani & S. Thompson (eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning, 157–194. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Tomoko
2005Affectedness constructions: How languages indicate positive and negative events. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley dissertation.Google Scholar
Somers, Harold
1987Valency and case in computational linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Song, Jae Jung
2010Korean benefactive particles and their meanings. In Fernando Zúñiga & Seppo Kittilä (eds.), Benefactives and malefactives: Typological perspectives and case studies, 393–418. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teng, S.-H
1975A semantic study of transitivity in Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert & Randy LaPolla
1997Syntax. Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Völlmin, Sascha
2010Benefactives and malefactives in Gumer (Gurage). In Fernando Zúñiga & Seppo Kittilä (eds.), Benefactives and malefactives: Typological perspectives and case studies, 317–330. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zúñiga, Fernando
2011aThe grammar of benefaction: A crosslinguistic study. Zurich: University of Zurich Habilitation thesis.Google Scholar
2011bWhy should beneficiaries be subjects (or objects)? In S. Kittilä, K. Västi, and J. Ylikoski (eds.), Case, Animacy and Semantic Roles, 329–348. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Brosig, Benjamin
2021. Expressing intent, imminence and ire by attributing speech/thought in Mongolian. Folia Linguistica 0:0 DOI logo
Brosig, Benjamin
2021. Expressing intent, imminence and ire by attributing speech/thought in Mongolian. Folia Linguistica 55:2  pp. 433 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.