Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 39:3 (2015) ► pp.635–663

Diachronic effects of rhinoglottophilia, symmetries in sound change, and the curious case of Basque

 | University of the Basque Country
The particular affinity linking glottality and nasality to each other, a connection which is grounded both on articulatory and acoustic bases, seems to be responsible for various phonetic phenomena in different languages. In sound changes associated to what has been termed rhinoglottophilia (Matisoff 1975), the two logically possible diachronic pathways show up: from glottality to secondary nasalization, on the one hand, and from nasality to secondary laryngealization, on the other. The innovations concerned can thus be considered symmetrical, a feature that is rarely found in sound change. This paper first reviews the evidence at our disposal for positing a class of replacive phonetic changes caused by rhinoglottophilia, and then argues for an explanation of the diachronic correspondence n > h in the history of the Basque language based on the (primarily acoustic) effects of this specific connection between glottality (more specifically, aspiration) and nasality.
Keywords: symmetry, aspiration, nasalization, rhinoglottophilia, Basque historical phonology, diachronic phonology, perceptually based sound change
Published online: 29 October 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.39.3.04iga
References (85)
Ahland, Michael. 2006. Nasal spreading, rhinoglottophilia, and the genesis of a non-etymological nasal consonant in Mesmes. In Rebecca T. Cover & Yuni Kim (eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 13–24. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Allières, Jacques. 1992. Gascón y euskera: afinidades e interrelaciones lingüísticas. Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca “Julio de Urquijo” – International Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philology 26(3). 801–812.Google Scholar
Andersen, Henning. 1972. Diphthongization. Language 48(1). 11–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Grammaticalization in a speaker-oriented theory of change. In Thórhallur Eythórsson (ed.), Grammatical change and linguistic theory: The Rosendal papers, 11–44. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arai, Takayuki. 2006. Cue parsing between nasality and breathiness in speech perception. Journal of Acoustic Sciences and Technology 27(5). 298–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arzamendi, Jesús. 1985. Términos vascos en documentos medievales de los ss. X–XVI1. Bilbao: Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco.Google Scholar
Baldi, Philip. 2002. The foundations of Latin. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Juliette. 2004. Evolutionary phonology. The emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. A theoretical synopsis of Evolutionary Phonology. Theoretical Linguistics 32(2). 117–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Consonant epenthesis: Natural and unnatural histories. In Jeff Good (ed.), Linguistic universals and language change, 79–107. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Juliette & Andrew Garrett. 1992. Ponapean nasal substitution: New evidence for rhinoglottophilia. Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on the Place of Morphology in a Grammar , 2–21. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
. 1993. The evolution of Ponapeic nasal substitution. Oceanic Linguistics 32(2). 199–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blust, Robert. 2000. Chamorro historical phonology. Oceanic Linguistics 39(1). 83–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Botma, Bert. 2004. Phonological aspects of nasality: An element-based dependency approach. Utrecht: Landelijke Onderzoeckschool Taalwetenschap.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2012. Patterns of lexical diffusion and articulatory motivation for sound change. In Maria-Josep Solé & Daniel Recasens (eds.), The initiation of sound change: Perception, production, and social factors, 211–234. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colarusso, John. 1988. The Northwest Caucasian languages: A phonological survey. New York: Garland (cited from the microfilm of the Harvard dissertation, 1975).Google Scholar
Egurtzegi, Ander. 2013. Phonetics and phonology. In Mikel Martínez-Areta (ed.), Basque and Proto-Basque: Language-internal and typological approaches to linguistic reconstruction (Mikroglottika, Minority Language Studies 5), 119–172. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2014. Towards a phonetically grounded diachronic phonology of Basque. University of the Basque Country dissertation.Google Scholar
Elgendy, Ahmed. A. 2001. Aspects of pharyngeal coarticulation. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam dissertation.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A. 1990. From esses to aitches: Identifying pathways of diachronic change. In William Croft, Keith Denning & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Studies in typology and diachrony, 59–78. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Andrew & Keith Johnson. 2013. Phonetic bias in sound change. In Alan C.L. Yu (ed.), Origins of sound change: Approaches to phonologization, 51–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gavel, Henri. 1920. Élements de phonétique basque. Paris: Honoré Champion (=Revista Internacional de los Estudios Vascos 12).Google Scholar
Gorrochategui, Joaquín. 1984. Onomástica indígena de Aquitania. Bilbao: Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco.Google Scholar
. 2015. Akitaniera eta euskara. In Beatriz Fernandez & Pello Salaburu (eds.), Ibon Sarasola, Gorazarre: Homenatge, Homenaje, 291–302. Bilbao: Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco.Google Scholar
Gorrochategui, Joaquín & Joseba A. Lakarra. 2001. Comparación lingüística, filología y reconstrucción del protovasco. In Francisco Villar & Mª. Pilar Fernández Álvarez (eds.), Religión, lengua y cultura prerromanas de Hispania, 407–438. Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca.Google Scholar
Grierson, George A. 1922. Spontaneous nasalization in the Indo-Aryan languages. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (New Series) 54(3). 381–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guiter, Henri. 1989. Elementos de cronología fonética del vascuence. Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca “Julio de Urquijo” – International Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philology 23(3). 797–800.Google Scholar
Hajek, John. 2005. Vowel nasalization. In Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds.), World atlas of language structures, 46–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hansson, Gunnar Ó. 2008. Diachronic explanations of sound change. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(5). 859–893. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1986. Assimilation as spreading in Toba Batak. Linguistic Inquiry 17(3). 467–499.Google Scholar
Hetzron, Robert. 1969. Two notes on Semitic laryngeals in East Gurage. Phonetica 191. 69–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio. 1993. On the historical origin of Basque accentuation. Diachronica 10(1). 13–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Segmental phonology. In José Ignacio Hualde & Jon Ortiz de Urbina (eds.), A grammar of Basque, 15–65. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hurch, Bernhard. 1988. Über Aspiration: Ein Kapitel aus der natürlichen Phonologie. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 1972. Nasals and nasalization in Kwa. Studies in African Linguistics 3(2). 167–205.Google Scholar
. 1975. Nasal states and nasal processes. In Charles A. Ferguson, Larry M. Hyman & John J. Ohala (eds.), Nasálfest: Papers from a symposium on nasals and nasalization, 249–264. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2013. Enlarging the scope of phonologization. In Alan C.L. Yu (ed.), Origins of sound change: Approaches to phonologization, 3–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Igartua, Iván. 2008. La aspiración de origen nasal en la evolución fonológica del euskera: Un caso de rhinoglottophilia . Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca “Julio de Urquijo” – International Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philology 42(1). 171–189.Google Scholar
. 2011. Historia abreviada de la aspiración en las lenguas circumpirenaicas. In Andoni Sagarna, Joseba A. Lakarra & Patxi Salaberri (eds.), Piriniotako hizkuntzak: Lehena eta oraina / As luengas d’os Pirineus, passau y presén / Las lengas deus Pirineus, passat e present / Las llengües dels Pirineus, passat i present, 895–918. Bilbao: Euskaltzaindia.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1952. Reviews: New Slavic etymological dictionaries. Word 81. 385–394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1971. While reading Vasmer’s dictionary. In Selected writings II: Word and language, 620–649. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael J. & Charles W. Kisseberth. 1979. Generative phonology. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lakarra, Joseba A. 1997. Gogoetak aitzineuskararen berreraiketaz: konparaketa eta barneberreraiketa. Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca “Julio de Urquijo” – International Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philology 31(2). 537–616.Google Scholar
. 2009. *h3 > h1, *h2 > h1 eta horiei datxezkien zenbait fenomenoz. Lapurdum 131. 211–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Aitzineuskararen berreraiketaz: egindakoaz eta eginkizunez. In Andoni Sagarna, Joseba A. Lakarra & Patxi Salaberri (eds.), Piriniotako hizkuntzak: Lehena eta oraina / As luengas d’os Pirineus, passau y presén / Las lengas deus Pirineus, passat e present / Las llengües dels Pirineus, passat i present, 617–694. Bilbao: Euskaltzaindia.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn E.F. 1988. Phonetic invariance and the adaptive nature of speech. In Ben A.G. Elsendoorn & Herman Bouma (eds.), Working models of human perception, 139–173. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1990. Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In William J. Hardcastle & Alain Marchal (eds.), Speech production and speech modelling, 403–439. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, Björn E.F., Susan Guion, Susan Hura, Seung-Jae Moon & Raquel Willerman. 1995. Is sound change adaptive? Rivista di linguistica 7(1). 5–37.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 1975. Rhinoglottophilia: The mysterious connection between nasality and glottality. In Charles A. Ferguson, Larry M. Hyman & John J. Ohala (eds.), Nasálfest: Papers from a symposium on nasals and nasalization, 265–287. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1990. On megalocomparison. Language 66(1). 106–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991a. Sino-Tibetan linguistics: Present state and future prospects. Annual Review of Anthropology 201. 469–504. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991b. Areal and universal dimensions of grammaticalization in Lahu. In Elizabeth Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. 21, 383–453. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Merlingen, Weriand. 1977. Artikulation und Phonematik des h. Vienna: Verband der wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaften Österreichs.Google Scholar
Meyer-Lübke, W. 1924. Der Schwund des zwischensilbigen n im Baskischen. Revista Internacional de los Estudios Vascos 151. 209–223.Google Scholar
Michailovsky, Boyd. 1975. A case of rhinoglottophilia in Hayu. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 2(2). 293.Google Scholar
Michaud, Alexis. 2006. Three extreme cases of neutralisation: Nasality, retroflexion and lip- rounding in Naxi. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 351. 23–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michelena, Luis. 1950. De fonética vasca: la aspiración intervocálica. In Joseba A. Lakarra & Iñigo Ruiz Arzalluz (eds.), Obras completas. VII. Fonética y fonología. Morfosintaxis. Dialectología, 3–20. Donostia-San Sebastián & Vitoria-Gasteiz: Diputación Foral de Guipúzcoa & Universidad del País Vasco (2011).Google Scholar
. 1951. La sonorización de las oclusivas iniciales: a propósito de un importante artículo de André Martinet. In Joseba A. Lakarra & Iñigo Ruiz Arzalluz (eds.), Obras completas. VII. Fonética y fonología. Morfosintaxis. Dialectología, 33–46. Donostia-San Sebastián & Vitoria-Gasteiz: Diputación Foral de Guipúzcoa & Universidad del País Vasco (2011).Google Scholar
. 1977. Fonética histórica vasca, 2nd edn. San Sebastián: Diputación Foral de Guipúzcoa.Google Scholar
. 1995 [1957]. The ancient Basque consonants. In José Ignacio Hualde, Joseba A. Lakarra & Robert L. Trask (eds.), Towards a history of the Basque language, 101–135. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
OEH: Orotariko euskal hiztegia / Diccionario general vasco (ed. by Luis Michelena & Ibon Sarasola). Bilbao: Euskaltzaindia and Desclée de Brouwer. 1987–2005.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1975. Phonetic explanations for nasal sound patterns. In Charles A. Ferguson, Larry M. Hyman & John J. Ohala (eds.), Nasálfest: Papers from a symposium on nasals and nasalization, 289–316. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1981. The listener as a source of sound change. In Carrie S. Masek, Roberta A. Hendrick & Marie F. Miller (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior, 178–203. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
. 1983. The phonological end justifies any means. In Shirô Hattori & Kazuko Inoue (eds.), Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of linguists, Tokyo, 29 Aug. - 4 Sept. 1982, 232–243. Tokyo: Sanseido Shoten.Google Scholar
. 1993. The phonetics of sound change. In Charles Jones (ed.), Historical linguistics: Problems and perspectives, 237–278. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
. 2007. Moving phonological science from paper to the laboratory: The case of nasals and nasalization. Proceedings of the 16 th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 267–270. Saarbrücken: Universität des Saarlandes.
. 2012. The listener as a source of sound change: An update. In Maria-Josep Solé & Daniel Recasens (eds.), The initiation of sound change: Perception, production, and social factors, 21–35. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John J. & Manjari Ohala. 1993. The phonetics of nasal phonology: Theorems and data. In Marie K. Huffman & Rena A. Krakow (eds.), Nasals, nasalization, and the velum (Phonetics and phonology series 5), 225–249. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ó Maolalaigh, Roibeard. 2003a. Processes in nasalization and related issues. Ériu 531. 109–132.Google Scholar
. 2003b. Review of Festschrift for Professor D. S. Thomson, ed. by Donald MacAulay, James Gleasure & Colm Ó Baoill (Scottish Gaelic Studies 17), Aberdeen, 1996. Celtica 241. 306–330.Google Scholar
Ozanne-Rivierre, Françoise. 1982. Phonologie comparée des langues de Hienghène et du Proto-Océanien. In André-Georges Haudricourt & Françoise Ozanne-Rivierre, Dictionnaire thématique des langues de la région de Hienghène (Nouvelle-Calédonie) (LACITO Documents, Asie-Austronésie 4), 9–61. Paris: Société d’Études Linguistiques et Anthropologiques de France.Google Scholar
Robins, Robert H. 1957. Vowel nasality in Sundanese: A phonological and grammatical study. In John R. Firth et al. (eds.), Studies in linguistic analysis, 87–103. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Castellano, Lorenzo & Adela Palacio. 1948. El habla de Cabra. I. Revista de dialectología y tradiciones populares 41. 387–418.Google Scholar
Rogers, Chris. 2011. Spontaneous nasalization in Wichi’. Paper delivered at the CUNY Workshop On Endangered Language Phonology, January 15, 2011, New York. Available at: [URL] (accessed June 9, 2014).
Rohlfs, Gerhard. 1977. Le gascon: Études de philologie pyrénéenne, 3rd edn. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schadeberg, Thilo C. 1989. The velar nasal in Nyole. Annales Aequatoria 101. 169–179.Google Scholar
Shevelov, George Y. 1964. The prehistory of Slavic. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Sprigg, Richard K. 1987. ‘Rhinoglottophilia’ re-visited: Observations on ‘the mysterious connection between nasality and glottality’. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 10(1). 44–62.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 1987. Locality conditions and feature geometry. In Joyce McDonough & Bernadette Plunkett (eds.), Proceedings of North East Linguistics Society 171, 595–617. Amherst: Graduate Students Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Trask, Robert L. 1985. On the reconstruction of Pre-Basque phonology. In José Luis Melena (ed.), Symbolae Ludovico Mitxelena septuagenario oblatae, 885–891. Vitoria-Gasteiz: Instituto de Ciencias de la Antigüedad.Google Scholar
. 1997. The history of Basque. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zamora Vicente, Alonso. 1967. Dialectología española, 2nd edn. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Zellou, Georgia. 2012. Coarticulation in perception: Evidence from vowel nasality as perceptually associated with pharyngeal and nasal consonants in Moroccan Arabic. Talk given at the 13th Conference on Laboratory Phonology, Stuttgart, July 27–29, 2012.
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Blevins, Juliette & Ander Egurtzegi
2023. Refining explanation in Evolutionary Phonology: macro-typologies and targeted typologies in action. Linguistic Typology 27:2 ► pp. 289 ff. DOI logo
Manterola, Julen & José Ignacio Hualde
2021. Old Basque had */χ/, not /h/. Journal of Historical Linguistics 11:3 ► pp. 421 ff. DOI logo
Salaberri Zaratiegi, Patxi & Iker Salaberri Izko
2020. Nafarroako toponimia agusia aztergai: -oi(t)z, -o(t)z, -(i)(t)z duten herri izenen inguruan. Fontes Linguae Vasconum :129 ► pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Egurtzegi, Ander
2017. Phonetically conditioned sound change. Diachronica 34:3 ► pp. 331 ff. DOI logo
Egurtzegi, Ander
2018. On the phonemic status of nasalized /h̃/ in Modern Zuberoan Basque. Linguistics 56:6 ► pp. 1353 ff. DOI logo
Egurtzegi, Ander
2019. Metathesis of aspiration as the source of anticipatory voicelessness in Basque. Journal of French Language Studies 29:2 ► pp. 265 ff. DOI logo
Hualde, José Ignacio
2015. Dialektologia dinamikoa. Lapurdum :Numéro spécial 3 ► pp. 125 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.