Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 4:1 (1980) ► pp.158164
Bresnan, J.
1970 “On Complementizers: Toward a Syntactic Theory of Complement Types”. Foundations of Language, 61. Pp. 297–321.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
1973 “Conditions on Transformations” in S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky (eds) A Festschrift for Morris Halle. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, N.Y.Google Scholar
1977 “On WH-Movement” in P. W. Culicover, T. Wasow and A. Akmajian (eds) Formal Syntax, Academic Press, N. Y.Google Scholar
Emonds, J.
1972 “A Reformulation of Certain Syntactic Transformations” in Peters (1972).Google Scholar
1976A Transformational Approach to English Syntax: Root, Structure-Preserving and Local Transformations. Academic Press, N. Y.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C.
1972 “On Generativity” in Peters (1972).Google Scholar
Horn, L.
1971 “Negative Transportation: Unsafe at any speed?”. Chicago Linguistic Society, Volume 71, Pp. 120–133.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. and Kiparsky, C.
1970 “Fact” in M. Bierwisch and K. Heidolph (eds) Progress in Linguistics. Mouton, The Hague. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, R.
1968Abstract Syntax and Latin Complementation. M. I. T. Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Peters, S.
(ed.) 1972Goals of Linguistic Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, P.
1967The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions. M. I. T. Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Ross, J.
1967Constraints on Variables in Syntax. M. I. T. Ph. D. dissertation.Google Scholar