Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 40:1 (2016) ► pp.137–175

Constructional change vs. grammaticalization

From compounding to derivation

| University of Cologne
| Tohoku University
| Guangdong University of Foreign Studies
Building on recent findings made in the framework of Construction Grammar, on the one hand, and within the framework on grammaticalization, on the other, the present paper is concerned with the development from lexical compounding to derivation. Compounding is presumably the most common source of derivational categories and this applies in particular to modifying (endocentric) compounds, which are the main subject of this paper. By looking at three cases of grammatical change in English, German, and the West African language Ewe it is argued that the two frameworks differ in their goals and in their approaches. Both frameworks search for regularities in grammatical change, but whereas Construction Grammar has a focus on constructional change, that is, change in the development of constructions, the central question asked by students of grammaticalization is how and why, e.g., lexical categories give rise to grammatical (or functional) categories.
Keywords: Construction Grammar, decategorialization, derivation, desemanticization, compounding, constructional change, grammaticalization
Published online: 29 April 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.40.1.05hei
References (101)
Anderson, Steven R. 1992. A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Appah, Clement Kwamina Insaidoo. 2013. Construction Morphology: Issues in Akan Complex Morphology. Lancaster University dissertation.Google Scholar
Appah, Clement Kwamina Insaidoo & N.A.A. Amfo. 2011. The morphopragmatics of the diminutive morpheme (-ba/-wa) in Akan. Lexis. E-Journal in English Lexicology 61. 85–103.Google Scholar
Bauer, L. 1978. The grammar of nominal compounding, with special reference to Danish, English and French. Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar
. 2003. Introducing linguistic morphology, 2nd edn. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press and Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter. 2010. Grammaticalization in Chinese: A construction-based account. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization, 245–277. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bisetto, A. & Sergio Scalise. 2005. The classification of compounds. Lingue e Linguaggio 4(2). 319–332.Google Scholar
Blank, Andreas. 2001. Pathways of lexicalizaion. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language typology and linguistic universals: An international handbook(Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft), 1596–1608. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2005. Copounding and derivation: Evidence for construction morphology. In Wolfgang U. Dressler, Dieter Kastovsky, Oskar E. Pfeiffer & Franz Rainer (eds.), Morphology and its demarcations, 109–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2015. Morphological analysis. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 2nd edn, 449–71. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Börjars, Kerstin & Nigel Vincent. 2011. Grammaticalization and directionality. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 162–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2005. Lexicalization and language change (Research Surveys in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. 2003. Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 602–23. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82(4). 711–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Usage-based theory and grammaticalization. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 225–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 1992. Current morphology (Linguistic Theory Guides). London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Craig, Colette G. 1991. Ways to go in Rama: A case study in polygrammaticalization. In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. 21, 455–92. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William 2001. Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William & Alan Cruse 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik. 2010. Grammatical interference: Subject marker for and the phrasal verb particles out and forth . In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization, 75–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W.U. & L. Merlini Barbaresi. 1994. Morphopragmatics: Diminutives and intensifiers in Italian, German, and other languages. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duden: Grammatik der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. 1998. 6., neu bearbeitete Auflage, Vol. 41. Mannheim, Leipzig, Vienna, Zurich: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 2000. Grammaticalisation: Unidirectional, non-reversable? In Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds.), Pathways of change: Grammaticalization in English, 149–69. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Grammaticalization as analogically driven change? In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 31–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gisborne, Nikolas. 2011. Constructions, word grammar, and grammaticalization. Cognitive Linguistics 22(1). 155–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gisborne, Nikolas & Amanda Patten. 2011. Construction: Grammar and grammaticalization. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine, The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 92–104. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 2006. Constructions at work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harder, Peter & Kasper Boye. 2011. Grammaticalization and functional linguistics. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 56–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1992. Grammaticalization chains. Studies in Language 16(2). 335–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1993. Auxiliaries: Cognitive forces and grammaticalization. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1997a. Possession: Sources, forces, and grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997b. Cognitive foundations of grammar. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2003. Grammaticalization. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda(eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 575–601. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi & Friederike Hünnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Friederike Hünnemeyer. 1988. On the fate of Ewe ví ‘child’ – the development of a diminutive marker. AAP (Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere, Cologne) 161. 97–121.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Gunther Kaltenböck, Tania Kuteva & Haiping Long. 2013. An outline of discourse grammar. In Shannon Bischoff & Carmen Jany (eds.), Functional Approaches to Language, 175–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Christa König. 2005. Grammatical hybrids: Between serialization, compounding and derivation in !Xun (North Khoisan). In Wolfgang U. Dressler, Dieter Kastovsky, Oskar E. Pfeiffer & Franz Rainer, Morphology and its demarcations: Selected papers from the 11th Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2004, 81–96. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logo
. Forthcoming. The !Xun language: A dialect grammar of Northern Khoisan (Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung.). Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. The genesis of grammar: A reconstruction (Studies in the Evolution of Language 9). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2009. The genesis of grammar: On combining nouns. In Rudie Botha & Henriette de Swart (eds.), Language evolution: The view from restricted linguistic systems, 139–77. Utrecht: LOT (Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics).Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Heiko Narrog. 2015. Grammaticalization and linguistic analysis. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 2nd edn, 407–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2008. Germanic future constructions: A usage-based approach to language change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word-formation, and syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. From hand-carved to computer-based: Noun-participle compounding and the upward strengthening hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics 26(1). 113–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2004. Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal? In Walter Bisang, et al. (eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components, 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Höhle, Tilman N. 1982. Über Komposition und Derivation: zur Konstituentenstruktur von Wortbildungsproduktion im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 11. 76–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticization. In Elizabeth Traugott C. & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. 11, 17–35. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hüning, Matthias & Geert Booij. 2014. From compounding to derivation: The emergence of derivational affixes through “constructionalization”. Folia Linguistica 48(2). 579–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Israel, Michael. 1996. The way constructions grow. In Adele Goldberg, (ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language, 217–30. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Jurafsky, Daniel. 1996. Universal tendencies in the semantics of the diminutive. Language 72(3). 533–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Bernd Heine & Tania Kuteva. 2011. On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35(4). 848–893. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 2012. Grammaticalization as optimization. In Dianne Jonas, John Whitman & Andrew Garrett (eds.), Grammatical change: Origins, nature, outcomes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1976 [1965]. The evolution of grammatical categories. Reprinted in Jerzy Kuryłowicz. 1976. Esquisses linguistiques, Vol. 21, 38–54. Munich: Finck.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1982. Thoughts on grammaticalization: A programmatic sketch, Vol.11 ( AKUP 48 – Arbeiten des Kölner Universalien-Projekts). Cologne: Universität zu Köln, Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
. 1985. Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile 20(3). 303–18.Google Scholar
. 1989. Grammatikalisierung und Lexikalisierung. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 421. 11–19.Google Scholar
. 2004. Theory and method in grammaticalization. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 321. 152–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle & Pavol Štekauer (eds.). 2009. The Oxford handbook of compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 34–53.Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle & Pavol Šteckauer (eds.). 2014. The Oxford handbook of derivational morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lord, Carol Diane. 1975. Igbo verb compounds and the lexicon. Studies in African Linguistics (Los Angeles) 6(1). 23–48.Google Scholar
Mair, Christian. 2004. Corpus linguistics and grammaticalization theory: Statistics, frequency, and beyond. In H. Lindquist & C. Mair (eds.), Corpus approaches to grammaticalization in English, 121–50. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mukarovsky, Hans. 1976. A study of Western Nigritic, Vol. II1 (Beiträge zur Afrikanistik, Band 2). Vienna: Afro-Pub.Google Scholar
Marchand, Hans. 1969. The categories and types of Present-Day English word-formation: A synchronic-diachronic approach, 2nd edn. Munich: Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko & Bernd Heine. To appear. Grammaticalisation. In Adam Ledgeway & Ian Roberts (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of historical syntax. Cambridge: Cambridg University Press.
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1998. Language form and language function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Noël, Dirk. 2007. Diachronic construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of Language 14(2). 177–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norde, Muriel. 2009. Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norde, Muriel & Karin Beijering. 2014. Facing interfaces: A clustering approach to grammaticalization and related changes. Folia Linguistica 48(2). 385–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norde, Muriel & Kristel Van Goethem. 2014. Bleaching, debonding and productivity of prefixoids: A corpus-based analysis of ‘giant’ in German and Swedish. Lingvisticae Investigationes 37(2). 256–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Patten, Amanda L. 2010. Cleft sentences, construction grammar and grammaticalization. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh dissertation.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann. 1880. Principien der Sprachgeschichte. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Ralli, A. 2013. Compounding in Modern Greek. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramat, Paolo. 2015. Grammaticalization. In Neil J. Smelser & Paul B. Baltes (eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, 2nd edn, 330–5. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scalise, Sergio & Petra Vogel (eds.). 2010. Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Klaus. 2003. Diminutives in English. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schrock, Terrill B. 2014. A grammar of Ik (Icé-tód): Northeast Uganda’s last thriving Kuliak language (Leiden University dissertation). Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, Rena & James A. Walker. 2011. Collocations in grammaticalization and variation. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine, The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, 225–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1995. Subjectification in grammaticalisation. In Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2003. Constructions in grammaticalization. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 624–47. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. The grammaticalization of NP of NP patterns. In Alexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), Constructions and language change, 23–46. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Graeme Trousdale (eds.). 2010. Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Contentful constructionalization. Journal of Historical Linguistics 4(2). 254–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trips, Carola. 2009. Lexical semantics and diachronic morphology. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Derivation and historical change. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavel Šteckauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of derivational morphology, 384–406. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme. 2008a. A constructional approach to lexicalization processes in the history of English: Evidence from possessive constructions. Word Structure 11. 156–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008b. Constructions in grammaticalization and lexicalization: Evidence from the history of a composite predicate in English. In Graeme Trousdale & Nikolas Gisborne (eds.), Constructional approaches to English grammar, 33–67. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2008c. Words and constructions in grammaticalization: The end of the English impersonal construction. In Susan M. Fitzmaurice & Donka Minkova (eds.), Studies in the history of the English language IV: Empirical and analytical advances in the study of English language change, 301–26. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Multiple inheritance and constructional change. Studies in Language 37(3). 491–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trousdale Graeme & Muriel Norde. 2013. Degrammaticalization and constructionalization: Two case studies. Language Sciences 361. 32–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Bogaert, Julie. 2011. I think and other complement-taking mental predicates: A case of constructional grammaticalization. Linguistics 49(2). 295–332.Google Scholar
Wälchli, B. 2005. Co-compounds and Natural Coordination (Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiemer, Björn. 2014. Quo vadis grammaticalization theory? Why complex language change is like words. Folia Linguistica 481. 425–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (11)

Cited by 11 other publications

Mélac, Eric & Joanna Bialek
2024. Evidentiality as a grammaticalization passenger. Studies in Language 48:3 ► pp. 638 ff. DOI logo
Heine, Bernd, Tania Kuteva, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Fang Wu
2020. Where do demonstratives come from?. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 73:3 ► pp. 403 ff. DOI logo
Zhan, Fangqiong & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2020. A study of the development of the Chinese correlative comparative construction from the perspective of constructionalization. Diachronica 37:1 ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, DOI logo
Coussé, Evie, Peter Andersson & Joel Olofsson
2018. Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar. In Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 21], ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Granvik, Anton
2018. The development of the conditional caso construction in Spanish. In Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 21], ► pp. 205 ff. DOI logo
Granvik, Anton
2020. Análisis construccionista de la historia de "señal" en español. Revista de Historia de la Lengua Española :15 ► pp. 43 ff. DOI logo
Heine, Bernd
2018. Are there two different ways of approaching grammaticalization?. In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 202], ► pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Heine, Bernd
2023. Grammaticalization. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Morphology, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Hilpert, Martin
2018. Three open questions in Diachronic Construction Grammar. In Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 21], ► pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Noël, Dirk
2016. For a radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30 ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.