Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 40:3 (2016) ► pp.591–621

“Cyclic” time in the history of Russian

Culture and language internal factors

| UiT The Arctic University of Norway
This article offers a diachronic analysis of the concept of “cyclic” time in Russian, more specifically of temporal adverbials such as utrom ‘in the morning’ and vesnoj ‘in the spring’ that refer to the diurnal and annual temporal cycles in nature. It is argued that evidence from diachrony bears on important theoretical questions: Is the sensitivity to “cyclic” time in language due to cultural factors? How does the external factor of culture interact with language internal factors in the formation of temporal concepts? The proposed analysis indicates that the linguistic development in Russian does not mirror changes in cultural practices and values. Instead, the main burden of explanation is placed on a language internal factor, namely the general drift towards more analytic constructions in Russian, which I argue paved the way for the concept of “cyclic” time as reflected in the grammar of the Russian language today.
Keywords: diachrony, time in language, temporal adverbials, Russian
Published online: 18 October 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.40.3.04nes
References (66)
Anstatt, Tanja. 1996. ‘Zeit’: Motivierungen und Strukturen der Bedeutungen von Zeitbezeichnungen in slavischen und anderen Sprachen. Munich: Verlag Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
Børtnes, Jostein. 1988. Visions of glory: Studies in Early Russian hagiography. Oslo: Solum and Humanities Press International, INC: New Jersey.Google Scholar
. 1989. The literature of old Russia. In Charles A. Moser (ed.), The Cambridge history of Russian literature. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Coulson, Seana & Cristobal Pagán Cánovas. 2013. Understanding timelines: Conceptual metaphor and conceptual integration. Cognitive Semiotics 5.1-2. 198–219.Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2004. Language, mind and brain. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Dickey, Stephen M. 2008. A prototype account of the development of delimitative po in Russian. In Dagmar Divjak & Agata Kochanska (eds.), Cognitive paths into the Slavic domain, 326–371. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Divjak, Dagmar S. 2015. Exploring the grammar of perception: A case study using data from Russian. Functions of Language 22(1). 44–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan. 2003. The structure of time: Language, meaning, and temporal cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. The meaning of time: Polysemy, the lexicon and conceptual structure. Journal of Linguistics 411. 33–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Language and time: A cognitive linguistics approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje, Svein Lie & Kjell Ivar Vannebo. 1996. Norsk Referansegrammatikk. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner. 2008. Rethinking metaphor. In Raymond W. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, 53–66. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filin, Fedot P. 1965–. Slovar’ russkix narodnyx govorov. Leningrad/St. Petersburg: Nauka.Google Scholar
Foster, Russell G. & Leon Kreitzman. 2004. Rhythms of life. London: Profile books.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1966. Person, time, and conduct in Bali (Yale University Cultural Report Series no. 14). New Haven: Yale University.Google Scholar
Gladkova, Anna. 2012. Universals and specifics of ‘time’ in Russian. In Luna Filipović & Kasia Jaszczolt (eds.), Space and time in languages and cultures: linguistic diversity, 167–188. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grannes, Alf. 1986. Genitivus temporis in early Eighteenth Century Russian. Russian Linguistics 101. 53–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guiraud-Weber, Marguerite. 2011. La perception du temps chez les Russes et les Français. In Essais de syntaxe russe et contrastive, 327–334. Aix-en-Provence: Publications de l’université de Provence.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. From space to time. Temporal adverbials in the world’s languages. Munich and Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm von. 1907/1968. Wilhelm von Humboldts Werke, vol. 71. Berlin: B. Behr’s Verlag (reprinted 1968 by Walter de Gruyter & Co.).Google Scholar
Il’ina, Nadežda E. 1996. Rost analitizma v morfologii. In Elena A. Zemskaja (ed.), Russkij jazyk konca XX stoletija. Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kul‘tury.Google Scholar
Ipat’evskaja letopis’. 1998. Volume 2 of Polnoe sobranie russkix letopisej. Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kul’tury.Google Scholar
Jakovleva, Ekaterina S. 1991. Vremja i pora v oppozicii linejnogo i cikličeskogo vremeni. In Nina D. Arutjunova (ed.), Logičeskij analiz jazyka: kul’turnye koncepty, 45–51. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
. 1992. Jazykovoe otraženie cikličeskoj modeli vremeni. Voprosy Jazykoznanija 41. 73–83.Google Scholar
. 1994. Fragmenty russkoj jazykovoj kartiny mira (modeli prostranstva, vremeni i vosprijatija). Moscow: “GNOZIS”.Google Scholar
Janda, Laura A. 1993. A geography of case semantics. The Czech dative and the Russian instrumental. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janda, Laura A. & Valery Solovyev. 2009. What constructional profiles reveal about synonymy: A case study of Russian words for SADNESS and HAPPINESS. Cognitive Linguistics 20(2). 367–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The body in the mind. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang. 1994. Time in language. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2009. How time is encoded. In Wolfgang Klein & Ping Li (eds.), The expression of time, 39–82. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought, 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Rafael E. Núñez. 2000. Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landau, Barbara & Lila R. Gleitman. 1985. Language and experience: Evidence from the blind child. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lavrent’evskaja letopis’. 1997. Volume 1 of Polnoe sobranie russkix letopisej. Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kul’tury.Google Scholar
Lomonosov, Mixail V. 1755/1972. Rossijskaja Grammatika. St. Petersburg: Akademija Nauk. (Facsimile edition: Leipzig 1972).Google Scholar
Makarova, Anastasia & Tore Nesset. 2013. Space-time asymmetries: Russian v ‘in(to)’ and the North Slavic temporal adverbial continuum. Russian Linguistics 37(3). 317–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malaxovskaja, L.S. 1958. Tvoritel’nyj vremeni. In Samuil B. Bernštejn (ed.), Tvoritel’nyj padež v slavjanskix jazykax, 222–245. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk.Google Scholar
Menzel, Thomas. 2008. Temporaladverbien oder Kasusfunktion: Der Instrumental der Zeit im Russischen, Polnischen und Serbischen/Kroatischen. In Sebastian Kempgen, Karl Gutschmidt, Ulrike Jekutsch & Ludger Udolph (eds.), Deutsche Beiträge zum 14. internationalen Slavistenkongress Ohrid 20081, 263–275. Munich: Verlag Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
Mikhaylov, Nikita. 2012. Tvoritel’nyj padež v russkom jazyke XVIII veka. Uppsala: Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Moore, Kevin Ezra. 2014. The spatial language of time. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nesset, Tore. 2004. Case assignment and image schemas: Russian temporal adverbials. Studies in Language 28(2). 285–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. How Russian became typologically unusual: The history of Russian temporal adverbials with v ‘in(to)’. Scando-Slavica 59(1). 32–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. How Russian came to be the way it Is. Bloomington: Slavica Publishers.Google Scholar
Núñez, Rafael E. 2009. Numbers and arithmetic: Neither hardwired nor out there. Biological Theory 4(1). 68–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ostrowski, Donald (ed.). 2003. The Pověst’ vremennykh lět: An interlinear collation and paradosis. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pavlova, Rumjana. 1977. Prostranstvennye konstrukcii v drevnerusskom jazyke v sopostavlenii s drevnebolgarskim jazykom. Sofia: Izdatel’stvo Bolgarskoj akademii nauk.Google Scholar
Panov, Mixail V. (ed.) 1968. Morfologija i sintaksis sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo jazyka. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Peškovskij, Aleksandr M. 1914. Russkij sintaksis v naučnom osveščenii. Moscow: Tipografija M. V. Sablina.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Daniel & Anthony Grafton. 2010. Carthographies of time: A history of the timeline. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar
Seuren, Pieter A.M. 2013. From Whorf to Montague: explorations in the theory of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinha, Vera da Silva, Chris Sinha, Wany Sampaio & Jörg Zinken. 2012. Event-based time intervals in an Amazonian culture. In Luna Filipović & Kasia Jaszczolt (eds.), Space and time in languages and cultures: linguistic diversity, 15–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slovar’ russkogo jazyka. (Malyj Akademičeskij slovar’, fourth edition). 1999. Moscow: Russkij jazyk.Google Scholar
Slovar’ russkogo jazyka XI–XVII vv1. 1975–. Moscow: Nauka.
Toporov, Vladimir N. 1961. Lokativ v slavjanskix jazykax. Moscow: Izdatel’ stvo Akademii nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
Turner, Mark. 2014. The origin of ideas. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. Philosophical Review 661.143–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weisgerber, Leo. 1929. Muttersprache und Geistesbildung. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1980. The case for surface case. Ann Arbor: Karoma Publishers.Google Scholar
. 1992. Semantics, culture, and cognition: universal human concepts in culture-specific configurations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1997. Understanding cultures through their key words: English, Russian, Polish, German, and Japanese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2005. Russkie kul’turnye skripty i ix otraženie v jazyke. In Anna A. Zaliznjak, Irina B. Levontina & Aleksej D. Šmelev, Ključevye idei russkoj jazykovoj kartiny mira, 467–499. Moscow: Jazyki Slavjanskoj kul’tury.Google Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin Lee. 1956. Language, thought, and reality. Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (edited and with an introduction by John B. Carroll). Cambridge: The M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Zaliznjak, Anna A. & Aleksej D. Šmelev. 2005. Vremja sutok i vidy dejatel’nosti. In Anna A. Zaliznjak, Irina B. Levontina & Aleksej D. Šmelev, Ključevye idei russkoj jazykovoj kartiny mira, 39–50. Moscow: Jazyki Slavjanskoj kul’tury.Google Scholar
Zaliznjak, Anna A., Irina B. Levontina & Aleksej D. Šmelev. 2005. Ključevye idei russkoj jazykovoj kartiny mira. Moscow: Jazyki Slavjanskoj kul’tury.Google Scholar