Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 40:4 (2016) ► pp.955–987

Subject pronoun doubling in Agul

Spoken corpus data on a rare discourse pattern

| Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences
The paper describes the doubling of free personal pronouns in Agul, an East Caucasian language spoken in Daghestan, Russia. The doubling construction consists of a subject pronoun in the canonical preverbal position, paired with an identical instance of the same pronoun immediately following the verb. The first pronoun is usually adjacent to the “verb–pronoun” combination, though it can optionally be separated by another constituent. In the oral corpus consulted for the analysis, the construction is found most often with the primary verb of speech in clauses introducing a quote (e.g. ‘I said I, …’). I argue that the doubling pattern originated as the conflation of a preverbal subject with a very frequent “verb–subject” word order used with highly topical referents. The function of the doubling construction is therefore postulated to draw additional attention to the referent. A brief comparison of Agul doubling and related phenomena in other languages (e.g. person agreement and clitic doubling) is also offered.
Keywords: speech reports, personal pronouns, Agul, East Caucasian languages, person agreement, word order, syntactic doubling
Published online: 2 February 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.40.4.08mai
References (43)
Alekseev, Mikhail E. 1985. Voprosy sravnitel´no-istoričeskoj grammatiki lezginskix jazykov. Morfologija. Sintaksis [The problems of comparative-historical grammar of Lezgic languages: Morphology. Syntax]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Arkadiev, Peter. 2010. Clitic doubling: Towards a typology. Paper presented at the Workshop “Clitics and Syntactic Typology” . Moscow, RGGU, 7 June 2010. [URL] (May 10, 2016).
Authier, Gilles. 2009. Grammaire Kryz (Langue caucasique d’Azerbaïdjan, dialecte d’Alik). Leuven–Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar
. 2010. Azeri morphology in Kryz (East Caucasian). Turkic Languages 14(1): 14–42.Google Scholar
Babaliyeva, Ayten. 2013. Études sur la morphosyntaxe du tabasaran littéraire. Paris: Thèse de doctorat, École pratique des hautes études.Google Scholar
Bogomolova, Natal´ja K. 2012. Ličnoe soglasovanie v tabasaranskom jazyke: konceptualizator i ego adresat v strukture situacii [Person agreement in Tabasaran: the conceptualizer and the addressee in the structure of the situation]. Voprosy jazykoznanija 41: 101–124.Google Scholar
. 2015. Ot mestoimenij k mestoimennym klitikam: pragmatika postglagol´noj pozicii v agul´skom jazyke [From pronouns to pronominal clitics: the pragmatics of postverbal position in Agul]. Paper presented at the conference “Tipologija morfosintaksičeskix parametrov” , Moscow, 14–16 October 2015.
De Vogelaer, Gunther. 2008. (De)grammaticalisation as a source for new constructions: the case of subject doubling in Dutch. In Alexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald (eds), Constructions and language change, 231–259. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
De Vogelaer, Gunther & Magda Devos. 2008. On geographical adequacy, or: How many types of subject doubling in Dutch. In Sjef Barbiers, Olaf Koeneman, Marika Lekakou & Margreet van der Ham (eds), Microvariation in syntactic doubling, 251–276. Bingley: Emerald. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dirr, Adolf M. 1907. Agul´skij jazyk [The Agul language]. Sbornik materialov dlja opisanija mestnostej i plemen Kavkaza. XXXVII1. Tiflis.Google Scholar
Forker, Diana & Oleg Belyaev. 2016. Word order and focus particles in Nakh-Daghestanian languages. In M.M. Jocelyne Fernandez-Vest & Robert D.Van Valin, Jr. (eds), Information structure and spoken language in a cross-linguistics perspective, 239–261. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. 2008. Balkan object reduplication in areal and dialectological perspective. In Dalina Kallulli & Liliane Tasmowski (eds), Clitic Doubling in the Balkan Languages, 35–63. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ganenkov, Dmitry, Yury Lander & Timur Maisak. 2010. From interrogatives to placeholders in Udi and Agul spontaneous narratives. In Nino Amiridze, Boyd Davis, & Margaret Maclagan (eds), Fillers, pauses, and placeholders (Typological Studies in Language 93), 95–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ganenkov, Dmitry, Timur Maisak & Solmaz Merdanova. 2008. Non-canonical Agent marking in Agul. In Helen de Hoop & Peter de Swart (eds), Differential Subject Marking (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 72). Dordrecht: Springer, 173–198.Google Scholar
Ganenkov, Dmitry S., Timur A. Maisak & Solmaz R. Merdanova. 2009. Diskursivnaja anafora v agul´skom jazyke [Discourse anaphora in Agul]. In NeFestšrift: Stat´i v podarok (k jubileju A. E. Kibrika) [Not-a-festschrift: Papers presented on occasion of A. E. Kibrik’s birthday]. Online edition, March 2009. [URL] (May 10, 2016).Google Scholar
Ganieva, Ajbike M. (comp.) 2011a. Svod pamjatnikov fol´klora narodov Dagestana. Tom 1. Skazki o životnyx [Collection of folklore of the peoples of Daghestan. Vol. 1. Animal tales]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
. (comp.) 2011b. Svod pamjatnikov fol´klora narodov Dagestana. Tom 2. Volšebnye skazki [Collection of folklore of the peoples of Daghestan. Vol. 2. Magic tales]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Gippert, Jost, Wolfgang Schulze, Zaza Aleksidze & Jean-Pierre Mahé. 2008. The Caucasian Albanian palimpsests of Mount Sinai (Series Ibero-Caucasica, 2). 2 Vols1. Turnhout: Brépols.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. 1994. Ergative-to-accusative shift in agreement: Tabassaran. In Howard I. Aronson (ed.), Linguistic studies in the non-Slavic Languages of the Commonwealth of Independent States and the Baltic Republics (NSL 7), 113–131. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
. 2002. Endoclitics and the origins of Udi morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Lyle Campbell. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey. 2004. Person. In Geert Booij, Christian Lehmann, Joachim Mugdan, & Stavros Skopeteas (eds), Morphologie: Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung / Morphology: An International Handbook on Inflection and Word Formation, 998–1015. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hewitt, B.G. & S.R. Crisp. 1986. Speech reporting in the Caucasus. In Florian Coulmas (ed.), Direct and indirect speech, 121–143. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kallulli, Dalina & Liliane Tasmowski. 2008. Introduction: Clitic doubling, core syntax and the interfaces. In Dalina Kallulli & Liliane Tasmowski (eds), Clitic doubling in the Balkan languages, 1–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kibrik, Aleksandr E. 1997. Beyond subject and object: Toward a comprehensive relational typology. Linguistic Typology 11: 279–346. Google Scholar
. 2003. Konstanty i peremennye jazyka [Constants and variables of language]. Saint-Petersburg: Aletejja.Google Scholar
Kibrik, Aleksandr E. & Mikhail G. Seleznev. 1982. Sintaksis i morfologija glagol´nogo soglasovanija v tabasaranskom jazyke [Syntax and morphology of Tabasaran verbal agreement]. In Tabasaranskie ètjudy [Tabasaran essays], 17–33. Moscow: Moscow State University.Google Scholar
Kibrik, Andrej A. 2011. Reference in discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Magometov, Aleksandr A. 1965. Tabasaranskij jazyk: Issledovanie i teksty [The Tabasaran language: analysis and texts]. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
. 1970. Agul´skij jazyk: Issledovanie i teksty [The Agul language: analysis and texts]. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
Maisak, Timur. 2012. Subject pronoun doubling in Agul: A corpus study of an unusual pattern. Paper presented at the conference “Syntax of the World’s Languages V” , Dubrovnik, 1-4 October 2012. [URL] (May 10, 2016).
Maisak [Majsak], Timur A. 2014. Agul´skie teksty 1900–1960-x godov [The Agul texts of 1900s–1960s]. Moscow: Academia.Google Scholar
Maisak, Timur & Solmaz Merdanova. 2010. Reported speech and “semi-directness” in Agul. Paper presented at the workshop “Reported speech in East Caucasian languages” adjacent to the conference “Syntax of the World’s Languages IV” , Lyon, 22 September 2010. [URL] (May 10, 2016).
Mazanaev, Šaban A. & Zaira M. Bazieva. 2014. Agul´skij fol´klor (ot ustnogo narodnogo tvorčestva – k literature) [The Agul folklore: from oral folk tradition to literature]. Makhachkala: DGU / IJaLI DNC RAN.Google Scholar
Menges, Karl H. 1995. The Turkic languages and peoples: An introduction to Turkic studies (2nd, revised ed.). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Merdanova, Solmaz R. 2004. Morfologija i grammatičeskaja semantika agul´skogo jazyka: na materiale xpjukskogo govora [Morphology and grammatical semantics of Agul: on the data from the Huppuq’ dialect]. Moscow: Sovetskij pisatel´.Google Scholar
Ramazanov, Muslim R. 2014. Grammatika agul´skogo jazyka: Naučno-normativnoe issledovanie [Agul grammar: a scientific-prescriptive analysis]. Makhachkala.Google Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 1995. “Theticity” and VS order: A case study. In Yaron Matras & Hans-Jürgen Sasse (eds), Verb-subject order and theticity in European languages. Special Issue of Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (STUF) 48(1-2): 3–31.Google Scholar
Schulze, Wolfgang. 2011. The origins of personal agreement clitics in Caucasian Albanian and Udi. In Manana Tandaschwili & Zakaria Pourtskhvanidze (eds.), Folia Caucasica. Festschrift für Prof. Jost Gippert zum 55. Geburtstag, 119–168. Frankfurt am Main: Universität Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Shaumjan [Šaumjan], Rafael´ M. 1941. Grammatičeskij očerk agul´skogo jazyka (s tekstami i slovarem) [Grammatical sketch of Agul (with texts and dictionary)]. Moscow & Leningrad: AN SSSR.Google Scholar
Sulejmanov, Nadir D. 1993. Sravnitel´no-istoričeskoe issledovanie dialektov agul´skogo jazyka [A comparative-historical study of Agul dialects]. Makhachkala: IJaLI DNC RAN.Google Scholar
Tarlanov, Zamir K. 1994. Aguly: ix jazyk i istorija [The Aguls: their language and history]. Petrozavodsk: Petrozavodsk State University.Google Scholar
. 2013. Problemy obščej grammatiki i grammatika agul´skogo jazyka [The problems of general grammar and the Agul grammar]. Makhachkala: IJaLI DNC RAN.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Tan, Tamisha L.
2022. Two cases of doubled pronouns in Amarasi. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 31:4 ► pp. 551 ff. DOI logo
Bogomolova, Natalia
2018. The rise of person agreement in East Lezgic: Assessing the role of frequency. Linguistics 56:4 ► pp. 819 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.