Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 41:1 (2017) ► pp.76–98

Nominal complex in West Circassian

Between morphology and syntax

 | Institute of Oriental Studies RAS | National Research University Higher School of Economics |
The paper presents a description and an analysis of the nominal complex, a peculiar construction which includes a noun and its modifiers, in West Circassian, a polysynthetic language of the Northwest Caucasian family. The nominal complex shows properties of a single word and tends to follow the template proposed for the word in West Circassian. However, its parts may themselves have a complex structure based on a similar template. This is argued to result from a principle that requires these subparts to be interpreted without appealing to a broader morphological context. In addition, the nominal complex may contain complex syntactic constituents as its proper parts. It is shown that the nominal complex in West Circassian is currently undergoing demorphologization and syntacticization.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Morphology (vs syntax) of West Circassian content words
  • 3.Nominal complex: Basic information
  • 4.Wordhood and stemhood
    • 4.1Lexical parts form the stem
    • 4.2The position of suffixes
    • 4.3Morphophonological properties
  • 5.Morphological embedding
    • 5.1Zone nesting with postnominal modifiers
    • 5.2Zone nesting with prenominal modifiers
  • 6.Syntacticization and demorphologization
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Abbreviations
  • Notes
  • References


This article is currently available as a sample article.

Published online: 1 June 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.41.1.03lan
References (38)
References
Andersen, Hennig. 2010. From morphologization to demorphologization. In Silvia Luraghi & Vit Bubenik (eds.), Continuum Companion to Historical Linguistics, 117–146. London, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
Arkadiev, Peter M. & Yakov G. Testelets. 2009. O trex čeredovanijax v adygejskom jazyke. In Yakov G. Testelets (ed.), Aspekty polisintetizma: Očerki po grammatike adygejskogo jazyka, 121–145. Moscow: RGGU.Google Scholar
Arkadiev, Peter M., Yury A. Lander, Alexander B. Letuchiy, Nina R. Sumbatova & Yakov G. Testelets. 2009. Vvedenie. Osnovnye svedenija ob adygejskom jazyke. In Yakov G. Testelets (ed.), Aspekty polisintetizma: Očerki po grammatike adygejskogo jazyka, 17–120. Moscow: RGGU.Google Scholar
Baker Mark C. 1988. Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2009. Lexical integrity as a formal universal: A constructionist view. In Sergio Scalise et al. (eds), Universals of language today, 83–100. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2005. Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chirikba, Viacheslav. 1996. Common West Caucasian. The reconstruction of its phonological system and parts of its Lexicon and morphology. Leiden: CNWS.Google Scholar
Flores Farfán, José Antonio. 2012. Another look at Nahuatl-Spanish contact morphology. In Hitomi Otsuka, Cornelia Stroh, & Anna Urdze (eds.), Many morphologies: Contributions to the festival of languages, Bremen, 17 Sept to 7 Oct 2009, 33–52. Bochum: Universitätsverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Hewitt, George. 2005. North West Caucasian. Lingua 1151: 91–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakovlev, Nikolay & Daud Ashkhamaf. 1941. Grammatika adygejskogo literaturnogo jazyka. Moscow, Leningrad: Izd. AN SSSR.Google Scholar
Jelinek, Eloise & David A. Demers. 1994. Predicates and pronominal arguments in Straits Salish. Language 7(4): 697–736. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joseph, Brian D. & Richard D. Janda. 1988. The how and why of diachronic morphologization and demorphologization. In Michael Hammond & Michael Noonan (eds.), Theoretical morphology, 193–210. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kerasheva, Zainab I. 1970. Osnovnye sintaksičeskie funkcii pričastij. In Adygejskaja filologija IV1, 3–24. Rostov-on-Don.Google Scholar
1977. Klassifikacija pričastij v adygskix jazykax. In Voprosy sintaksičeskogo stroja iberijsko-kavkazskix jazykov, 34–42. Nalchik.Google Scholar
Kibrik, Andrej A. 2011. Reference in discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Korotkova, Natalia & Yury Lander. 2010. Deriving affix order in polysynthesis: Evidence from Adyghe. Morphology 201: 299–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kumakhov, Mukhadin. 1964. Morfologija adygskix jazykov. Sinxronno-diaxronnaja xarakteristika. I1. Nalchik: Kabardino-Balkarskoe knižnoe izdatelʼstvo.Google Scholar
Kumakhov, Mukhadin & Karina Vamling. 2009. Circassian clause structure. Malmö: Malmö University. Google Scholar
Lander, Yury. 2010. Relativization in Shapsug Adyghe. Rice Working Papers in Linguistics 21: 75–91.Google Scholar
. 2014. Modifier incorporation in Dargwa nominals. Working papers by NRU HSE. Series WP BRP "Linguistics" 12/LNG/2014.Google Scholar
Lander, Yury & Alexander Letuchiy. 2010. Kinds of recursion in West Circassian morphology. In Harry van der Hulst (ed.), Recursion and human language, 263–284. Berlin, NY: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lander, Yury & Nina Sumbatova. 2007. Adygejskie otricanija. Kavkazskij lingvističeskij sbornik 181: 77–103.Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle & Sergio Scalise. 2007. The Lexical Integrity Hypothesis in a new theoretical universe. In G. Booij, L. Ducceschi, B. Fradin, E. Guevara, A. Ralli, & S. Scalise (eds.), Online Proceedings of the Fifth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM5), University of Bologna, 1–24. [[URL]]Google Scholar
Mattissen, Johanna. 2003. Dependent-Head Synthesis in Nivkh: A contribution to a typology of Polysynthesis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Complexity in nouns. Rivista di Linguistica 23(1): 79–103.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P.. 2001. Resultative constructions. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher, & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook, 928–940. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Sergej Je. Jaxontov. 1988. The typology of resultative constructions. In Vladimir P. Nedjalkov (ed.), Typology of Resultative Constructions, 3–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ogawa, Yoshiki. 2014. Diachronic demorphologization and constructionalization of compounds from the perspective of Distributed Morphology and Cartography. Interdisciplinary Information Sciences (Tohoku University) 20(2): 121–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paris, Catherine. 1989. Esquisse grammaticale du dialecte abzakh (tcherkesse occidental). In B. G. Hewitt (ed.), The Indigenous Languages of the Caucasus. Vol. 2: The North West Caucasian Languages, 154–260. New York: Caravan.Google Scholar
de Reuse, Willem J.. 2006. Polysynthetic language: Central Siberian Yupik. In Keith Brown (ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed.). Vol. 91, 745–748. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Polysynthesis as a typological feature. An attempt at a characterization from Eskimo and Athabascan perspectives. In Marc-Antoine Mahieu & Nicole Tersis (eds.), Variations on Polysynthesis: The Eskaleut Languages, 19–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rogava, Georgi V. & Zaynab I. Kerasheva. 1966. Grammatika adygejskogo jazyka. Krasnodar, Maykop: Krasnodarskoe knižnoe izdatelʼstvo.Google Scholar
Sadock, Jerold M. 1991. Autolexical syntax: A theory of parallel grammatical representations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Smeets, Rieks. 1984. Studies in West Circassian phonology and morphology. Leiden: The Hakuchi Press.Google Scholar
Swadesh, Morris. 1938. Nootka internal syntax. International Journal of American Linguistics 9(2-4): 77–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 1985. Case marking and the structure of the Lakhota clause. In Johanna Nichols & Anthony C. Woodbury (eds.), Grammar inside and outside the clause, 363–413. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1987. The role of government in the grammar of head-marking languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 53(4): 371–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, Johannes C. & Ludovic Ferrand. 1998. Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 5(4): 683–689. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Lander, Yury A. & Shamset Sh. Unarokova
2024. Defining pronominal series: demonstratives in West Circassian. Voprosy Jazykoznanija :2 DOI logo
Arkadiev, Peter M.
2020. Syntax in morphological guise: Interrogative verbal morphology in Abaza. Linguistic Typology 24:2 ► pp. 211 ff. DOI logo
Ershova, Ksenia
2020. Two paths to polysynthesis. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 38:2 ► pp. 425 ff. DOI logo
Ershova, Ksenia
2021. Diagnosing Clause Structure in a Polysynthetic Language:Wh-Agreement and Parasitic Gaps in West Circassian. Linguistic Inquiry 52:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Ershova, Ksenia
2024. Phasehood as defective intervention: Possessor extraction and selective DP islandhood in West Circassian. Syntax DOI logo
Arkadiev, Peter
2019. Vydrin, Valentin F., Yulia V. Mazurova, Andrej A. Kibrik and Elena B. Markus: Jazyki mira. Jazyki mande [Languages of the World. The Mande Languages]. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 40:1 ► pp. 149 ff. DOI logo
Arkadiev, Peter
2022. Morphology of the Caucasian Languages: A Typological Overview. Jezikoslovni zapiski 28:1 DOI logo
Arkadiev, Peter M. & Yakov G. Testelets
2019. Differential nominal marking in Circassian. Studies in Language 43:3 ► pp. 715 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.