Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 41:3 (2017) ► pp.638–659

Morphological self-repair

Self-repair within the word

| University of Colorado, Boulder
| University of Auckland
| SIL
| Nagoya University
| University of Helsinki
| University of Haifa
| University of Payame Noor
| University of Helsinki
| University of Wuppertal
| University of West Virginia
In this study we explore patterns of same-turn self-repair within the word, across ten typologically and areally diverse languages. We find universal processes emerging through language-specific resources, namely: recycling is used to delay a next item due, while replacement is used to replace an inappropriate item. For example, most of our languages with prefixes or proclitics recycle those elements to delay production of the root/host, while languages with suffixes tend not to recycle just suffixes without their roots/hosts, since that would not serve to delay the production of the root/host; rather, the whole word is recycled. Replacement of affixes and clitics is rare, regardless of position. We provide several possible explanations for these facts, all based on the nature of replacement.
Keywords: repair, typology, morphological structure
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The languages of the study
  • 3.Data and methods
  • 4.Simple recycling
  • 5.Simple replacements
  • 6.Combinations of recycling and replacement
    • 6.1Prerecycling of prefix/proclitic and replacement of root/host
    • 6.2Prerecycling of root/host and replacement of suffix/clitic
    • 6.3Postrecycling and circumrecycling in within-word replacements
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 25 October 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.41.3.04fox
References (21)
References
Dingemanse, Mark & Nick Enfield. 2015. Other-initiated repair across languages: Towards a typology of conversational structures. Open Linguistics 11. 98–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egbert, Maria. 2002. Der Reparatur-Mechanismus in deutschen and interkulterellen Gesprachen. Habilitation. Universität Oldenburg.Google Scholar
Fincke, Steven. 1999. The syntactic organization of repair in Bikol. In Barbara Fox, Daniel Jurafsky, & Laura Michaelis (eds.), Cognition and function in language, 252–267. Stanford, CSLI.Google Scholar
Floyd, Simeon, Elizabeth Manrique, Giovanni Rossi & Francisco Torreira. 2016. Timing of visual bodily behavior in repair sequences: Evidence from three languages. Discourse Processes 53(3). 175–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, Barbara & Robert Jasperson. 1995. A syntactic exploration of repair in English conversation. In P. Davis (ed.), Descriptive and theoretical modes in the alternative linguistics, 77–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara, Makoto Hayashi & Robert Jasperson. 1996. A cross-linguistic study of syntax and repair. In Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar, 185–237. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, Barbara, Fay Wouk, Makoto Hayashi, Steven Fincke, Liang Tao, Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Minna Laakso & Wilf Flores Hernandez. 2009. A cross-linguistic perspective on site of initiation of self-repair. In Jack Sidnell (ed.), Comparative studies in conversation analysis, 60–103. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, Barbara, Yael Maschler & Susanne Uhmann. 2010. A cross-linguistic study of self-repair: Evidence from English, German, and Hebrew. Journal of Pragmatics 421. 2487–2505. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, Barbara & Fay Wouk. In preparation. A cross-linguistic study of self-repair. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gomez de Garcia, Jule. 1994. Communicative strategies in conversational Kickapoo. Boulder: University of Colorado, Boulder PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2011. The indeterminacy of word segmentation and the nature of morphology and syntax. Folia Linguistica 45 (1). 31–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto. 1994. A comparative study of self-repair in English and Japanese conversation. In Noriko Akatsuka (ed.), Japanese/Korean linguistics IV, 77–93. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1974. Error correction as an interactional resource. Language in Society, 3(2). 181–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kärkäinnen, Elise, Marja-Leena Sorjonen, & Marja-Liisa Helasvuo. 2007. Discourse structure. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 301–371. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Massam, Diane. 2012. Count and mass across languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mirzayan, Armik. 2008. A preliminary study of same-turn self-repair initiation in Wichita conversation. In David Harrison, David Rood & Arienne Dwyer (eds.), Lessons from documented endangered languages, 317–354. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rieger, Caroline. 2003. Repetitions as self-repair strategies in English and German conversations. Journal of Pragmatics 351. 47–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel. 1979. The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In Talmy Givon (ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 121. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 2013. Ten operations in self-initiated, same-turn repair. In Makoto Hayashi, Geoff Raymond & Jack Sidnell (eds.), Conversational repair and human understanding, 41–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack. 2007. Comparative studies in conversation analysis. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 361. 229–44 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wouk, Fay. 2005. The syntax of repair in Indonesian. Discourse Studies 71. 237–258 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Raymond, Chase Wesley
2022. Suffixation and sequentiality. Interactional Linguistics 2:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kazemi, Ali
2020. Same-turn self-repairs in Farsi conversation: On their initiation and framing. Journal of Pragmatics 170 ► pp. 4 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.