Book review
Bernard Comrie. Language universals and linguistic typology. Syntax and morphology. Basil Blackwell, 1981. xii + 252 pp. £6.50andGraham Mallinson & Barry J. Blake. Language typology. Cross-linguistic studies in syntax [North-Holland Linguistic Series, 46]. North-Holland, 1981. xviii + 486 pp. Hfl. 125,--.
References (29)
References
Anderson, John M. 1980. “Essential criteria for the establishment of linguistic typologies. Discussion”. TCLC 201:179–193.
Andrews, Avery Delano III. 1975. Studies in the syntax of relative and comparative clauses. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Ph.D. diss.
Chafe, Wallace L. 1976. “Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view”. Li, Ch. N. (ed.), Subject and topic. New York etc.: Academic Press; 25–55.
Comrie, Bernard/Smith, Norval. 1977. “Lingua Descriptive Studies: Questionnaire”. Lingua 42/1.
Coseriu, Eugenio. 1972. “Über die Sprachtypologie Wilhelm von Humboldts”. Hösle, J./Eitel, W. (eds.), Beiträge zur vergleichenden Literaturgeschichte. Tübingen: Niemeyer; 107–135.
Coseriu, Eugenio. 1980. “Introduction: Der Sinn der Sprachtypologie”. TCLC201:157–170.
Drossard, Werner. 1983. Das Tagalog als Repräsentant des aktivischen Sprachbaus. Köln: Inst. f. Sprachwiss. d. Univ. (unpublished Ph.D. diss.).
Foley, William August. 1976. Comparative syntax in Austronesian. Berkeley: Univ. of California (unpublished Ph.D. diss.)
Fox, Barbara A. 1982. [Review of Mallinson/Blake 1981]. AJL 21:261–265.
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1954. “A quantitative approach to the morphological typology of language”. UAL 261 (1960):178–194.
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. “Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements”. Greenberg, J. H. (ed.), Universals of language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press; 58–90.
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1978. “How does a language acquire gender markers?” Greenberg (ed.) 1978, 31:47–82.
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1978. “Typology and cross-linguistic generalizations”. Greenberg (ed.) 1978, 11:33–59.
Greenberg, Joseph H. (ed.) 1978. Universals of human language. 41 vols. Stanford: Stanford U.P.
Humboldt, Wilhelm von. 1836. “Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluβ auf die geistige Entwickelung des Menschengeschlechtes”. Humboldt, W. v. 1972, Werke in funf Banden, Darmstadt: Wiss. Buchgesellschaft vol. III1.; 368–756.
Keenan, Edward L./Comrie, Bernard. 1977. “Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar”. LI 81:63–99.
Klimov, G. A. 1977. Tipologija jazykov aktivnogo stroja. Moskva: Nauka.
Lehmann, Christian. 1984. Der Relativsatz. Typologie seiner Strukturen, Theorie seiner Funktionen, Kompendium seiner Grammatik. Tübingen: Narr.
Lehmann, Christian. 1981. “Zur Universaliendiskussion in der italienischen Linguistik”. FoL 151:443–458.
Lehmann, Christian. 1982. [Answers to the questions]. Lehmann, Ch. (ed.), Twenty-four questions on linguistic typology and a collection of answers. Koln: Inst. f. Sprachwiss. d. Univ. (akup, 461); 32–41.
Lehmann, Christian. 1982. “Directions for interlinear morphemic translations”. FoL 161:199–224.
Lehmann, Christian. 1982. “Some current views of the language universal”. LeSt 171:91–111.
Lehmann, Christian. 1983. “Ergative (and active) traits in Latin”. Glossologia (Athens) 11:57–66.
Lehmann, Christian. 1983. “Rektion und syntaktische Relationen”. FoL 171:339–378.
Moravcsik, Edith. 1979. “Typology in Linguistics”. ALHung 291:315–337.
Moravcsik, Edith A./Wirth, Jessica (eds.). 1980. Current approaches to syntax. New York: Academic Press.
Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language. An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.
Seiler, Hansjakob. 1972. “Universals of language”. Leuv. Bijdr. 611:371–391.
Smith, Neill V. 1982. [Review of Comrie 1981]. AJL 21:253–261.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Lehmann, Christian
1988.
A survey of general comparative grammar.
Journal of Linguistics 24:1
► pp. 175 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.