Cover not available
Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 9:3 (1985) ► pp.395–407
Book review

Frank Heny & Barry Richards (eds.). Auxiliaries and Related Puzzels I and II. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1983.

Reviewed by
| University of Arizona, Dept. of Linguistics, TUCSON, AZ
Published online: 1 January 1985
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.9.3.06ste
References (19)
References
Ajdukiewicz, K. 1967. “Syntactic Connexion”, in Polish Logic 1920–39, S. McCall, éd., Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Akmajian, A., S. Steele, and T. Wasow. 1979. ‘The Category AUX in Universal Grammar”, Linguistic Inquiry 101.1–64.Google Scholar
Akmajian, A. and T. Wasow. 1975. “The Constituent of VP and AUX and the Position of the Verb BE”, Linguistic Analysis 11.205–245.Google Scholar
Bar-Hillel, Y. 1953. “A Quasi-Arithmetical Notation of Syntactic Descriptions”, Language 291.47–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic Structures, The Hague, Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1981. Lectures on Government and Binding, (Studies in Generative Grammar, 91), Dordrecht, Foris.Google Scholar
Emonds, J. 1976. A Transformational Approach to English Syntax, New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gazdar, G., G. Pullum, and I. Sag. 1982. “Auxiliaries and Related Phenomenan in a Restrictive Theory of Grammar”, Language 581.591–638. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hale, K. 1981. “On the position of Warlpiri in a Typology of the Base”, Bloomington, Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar, Cambridge, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kaisse, E. 1981. “Luiseño Particles and the Universal Behavior of Clitics”, Linguistic Inquiry 121.424–434.Google Scholar
Lambek, J. 1961. “On the Calculus of Syntactic Types”, in R. Jakobson, éd., Structure of Languages and its Mathematical Aspects, (Symposium in Applied Mathematics XII1), Providence, American Mathematical Society. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCawley, J. 1975. “The Category Status of English Modals”, Foundations of Language 121.597–601.Google Scholar
Martin-Callejo, E. 1984. Some Aspects of Basque Morphology and Syntax, Tucson, University of Arizona doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Pullum, G. 1981. “Evidence against the “AUX” Node in Luiseño and English”, Linguistic Inquiry 121.435–464.Google Scholar
Pullum, G. and D. Wilson. 1977. “Autonomous Syntax and the Analysis of Auxiliaries”, Language 531.741–788. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, J. 1967. “Auxiliaries as Main Verbs”, in Studies in Philosophical Linguistics, W. Todd, ed., Evanston, Great Expectations Press.Google Scholar
Steele, S., Akmajian, R. Demers, E. Jelinek, C. Kitagawa, R. Oehrle, and T. Wasow. 1981. An Encyclopedia of AUX: A Study in Cross-Linguistic Equivalence, ( Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 51), Cambridge, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Williams, E. 1984. Review Article of Chomsky 1981 Lectures on Government and Binding and Chomsky 1982 Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. In Language 601.400–408.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

[no author supplied]
2011. References. In The Acquisition of German, ► pp. 350 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.