Part of
The Role of Semantic, Pragmatic, and Discourse Factors in the Development of CaseEdited by Jóhanna Barðdal and Shobhana L. Chelliah
[Studies in Language Companion Series 108] 2009
► pp. 261–282
Edited by Jóhanna Barðdal and Shobhana L. Chelliah
[Studies in Language Companion Series 108] 2009
► pp. 261–282
Patterns of development, patterns of syncretism of relational morphology in the Bodic languages
In this paper, I present the results of an examination of the relational morphology in 76 Tibeto-Burman languages, primarily from the Bodic section of Tibeto-Burman. I will discuss a set of etymons used to express relational functions and show how the meanings of the reflexes of these etymons have evolved. I will then go on to discuss overall patterns of syncretism of relational markers in these languages. Finally, the relation between the observed overall patterns of syncretism and the evolution of the reflexes of the etymons will be discussed.
Cited by
Cited by 5 other publications
Chappell, Hilary & Jean‐Christophe Verstraete
2019. Optional and alternating case marking: Typology and diachrony. Language and Linguistics Compass 13:3 
Georgakopoulos, Thanasis
2018. A frame-based approach to the source-goal asymmetry. Constructions and Frames 10:1 ► pp. 61 ff.
Guerrero, Lilián
2012. La naturaleza de las frases locativas en construcciones de movimiento en yaqui. LIAMES: Línguas Indígenas Americanas 12:1 ► pp. 67 ff.
Luraghi, Silvia
2014. Plotting diachronic semantic maps. In Perspectives on Semantic Roles [Typological Studies in Language, 106], ► pp. 99 ff.
Luraghi, Silvia & Heiko Narrog
2014. Perspectives on semantic roles. In Perspectives on Semantic Roles [Typological Studies in Language, 106], ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.