Focus, mood and clause linkage in Umpithamu (Cape York Peninsula, Australia)
Umpithamu is poor in markers that specifically encode clause linkage, but it relies on markers from other domains, specifically mood and information structure. Such markers can contribute to clause linkage in three semiotically distinct ways. The first is compositional encoding, as with the purposive relation that is encoded by the combination of potential mood with a schema of argument sharing. The second is inference: with the conditional relation, potential mood provides a feature of non-actuality, and the causal relation between the propositions is left to inference. The third is encoded inference: with explanatory relations, use of a focus marker invokes a presupposition, which when not found in the context forces the inference of an explanatory relation with the preceding clause.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Olguín Martínez, Jesús
2023.
Precedence clauses in the world’s languages: negative markers need not be expletive.
STUF - Language Typology and Universals 76:4
► pp. 587 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Luk, Ellison & Jean-Christophe Verstraete
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2011.
The Functions of Represented Speech and Thought in Umpithamu Narratives.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 31:4
► pp. 491 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.