Cover not available
Part of
Modes of Modality: Modality, typology, and universal grammar
Edited by Elisabeth Leiss and Werner Abraham
[Studies in Language Companion Series 149] 2014
► pp. 1–16

Introduction

| University of Munich and University of Vienna
| University of Munich
Published online: 24 January 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.149.01lei
References
Abraham, Werner
1988 Vorbemerkungen zur Modalpartikelsyntax im Deutschen. Linguistische Berichte 118: 443–466.Google Scholar
1989 Syntaktische Korrelate zum Lesartwechsel zwischen epistemischen und deontisch/volitiven Modalverben. Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik (GAGL) 30: 145–166.Google Scholar
1991a Modalverben in der Germania. In Begegnung mit dem Fremden. Akten des VIII. Germanistenkongresses, Tokyo 1990. Vol. 4: Kontrastive Syntax, kontrastive Semantik, Lexikologie, Lexikographie, kontrastive Pragmatik, Eijiró Iwasaki (ed.) 109–118. München: Iudicium.Google Scholar
1991b Discourse particles in German: How does their illocutionary force come about? Between a maximalist and a minimalistic position. In Discourse Particles. Descriptive and Theoretical Investigations on the Logical, Syntactic and Pragmatic Properties of Discourse Particles in German and English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 12], Werner Abraham (ed.), 220–272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 Modals: Toward explaining the ‘epistemic non-finiteness gap’. In Modalität und Modalverben im Deutschen [Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 9], Reimar Müller & Marga Reis (eds),7–36. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
2002 Modal verbs: Epistemics in German and English. In Modality and its Interaction with the Verbal System [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 47], Sjef Barbiers, Frits Beukema & Wim van de Wurff (eds), 19–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 Event arguments and modal verbs. In Event Arguments: Foundations and Applications [Linguistische Arbeiten 501], Claudia Maienborn & Angelika Wöllstein (eds), 243–276. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Datives: Structural vs. inherent – abstract vs. morphological – autonomous vs. combinatory – universally vs. language-specifically configured? In Daniel Hole, André Meinunger & Werner Abraham (eds), Datives and Other Cases: Between Argument Structure and Event Structure [Studies in Language Companion Series 75], 3–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 Die Urmasse von Modalität und ihre Ausgliederung. Modalität anhand von Modalverben, Modalpartikel und Modus. Was ist das Gemeinsame, was das Trennende, und was steckt dahinter? In Modalität. Epistemik und Evidentialität bei Modalverb, Adverb, Modalpartikel und Modus [Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 77], Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 251–302. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
2010a Modalitäts-Aspekt-Generalisierungen: Interaktion und deren Brüche. Woi kommen die epistemischen Lesarten tiher? In Modalität. Temporalität in kontrastiver und typologischer Sicht, Andrzej Ktny & Anna Socka (eds), 13–27. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2010b Diskurspartikel zwischen Modalität, Modus und Fremdbewusstseinsabgleich (Theory of Mind). In 40 Jahre Partikelforschung, Theo Harden & Elke Hentschel (eds), 33–77. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2012a (Inter)Subjectification or foreign consciousness alignment/Other’s mind alignment as synchronic and diachronic concepts of change? Conceptualization and data fidelity. In Covert Patterns of Modality, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 24–78. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
2012b Covert modality in typology. In Covert Patterns of Modality, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 386–439. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
2012c Sprecherdeixis und Merkmaldistributionsdifferential deutscher Modalitätselemente. Deutsche Sprache 40: 200–231.Google Scholar
Abraham, Werner & Leiss, Elisabeth
2012d. Introduction. In Covert Patterns of Modality, Werner Abraham & Elizabeth Leiss (eds), 1–21. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
(eds) 2012e Modality and Theory of Mind across Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antomo, Mailin & Steinbach, Markus
2010 Desintegration und Interpretation: weil-V2-Sätze an der Schnittstelle zwischen Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 29: 1–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bach, Kent
2011 Perspectives on possibilities: Contextualism, relativism or what? In Epistemic Modality, Andy Egan & Brian Weatherson (eds), 19–59. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bavin, Edith L
1995 The obligation modality in Western Nilotic languages. In Modality in Grammar and Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 32], Joan Bybee & Suzanne Fleischman (eds), 107–133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef & Obenauer, Hans-Georg
2011 Discourse particles, clause structure, and question types. The Linguistic Review 28: 449–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef
2012 From modal particle to interrogative marker: A study of German denn. In Functional Heads [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 7], Laura Brugè, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro & Cecelia Poletto (eds) 13–28. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh
2006 Covert Modality in Non-finite Contexts. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, Derek
1990 Language and Species. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper
2012 Epistemic Meaning. A Crosslinguistic and Functional-cognitive Study [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 43]. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Jonney
2003 A minimalist treatment of modality. Lingua 113: 997–1029. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William
1994 The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
2000 Minimalist inquiries. In Step by Step: Essays in Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–155. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001 Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicsz (ed.),1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2004 Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Structures and Beyond, Adriana Belletti (ed.),104–131. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2008 On phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos Peregrín Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133–66. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coniglio, Marco
2011 Syntax der deutschen Modalpartikeln. Ihre Distribution und Lizensierung in Haupt- und Nebensätzen [Studia Grammatica 73]. Berlin: Akademieverlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delin, Judy, Hartley, Anthony G., Paris, Cecile, Scott, Donia & Van der Linden, Keith
1994 Expressing procedural relationships in multilingual instructions. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Generation Workshop (June 1994, Kennebunkport, ME), 61–70. [URL] (December 2011).Google Scholar
Depraetere, Ilse & Verhulst, An
2008 Source of modality: A reassessment. English Language and Linguistics 12(1): 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egg, Markus
2012 Discourse particles at the semantics-pragmatics interface. In Modality and Theory of Mind Elements across Languages [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 243], Werner Abraham & Elizabeth Leiss (eds), 297–333. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emenanjọ, E. Nolue
1978 Elements of Modern Igbo Grammar. Ibadan: OUP.Google Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly
2001 Modal particles in Germanic. Folia Linguistica Historica 22(1–2): 310–333.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1993 English Grammar. A Function-based Introduction, II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Alvin I
1970 A Theory of Human Action. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Grosz, Patrick
2009 Modal particles redux: Ruhig, bloß and JA: A case study in modal matching. Generals paper, MIT.Google Scholar
Hansen, Björn & de Haan, Ferdinand
(eds) 2009 Modals in the Languages of Europe. A Reference Work [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 44]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holvoet, Axel
2007 Mood and Modality in Latvian. Kraków: Wydawnictwo universitetu Jagiellońskiego.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
2012 Modals and Conditionals: New and Revised Perspectives [Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics]. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
1993 Reference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 4: 1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leiss, Elisabeth
[2009]2012. Sprachphilosophie, 2nd edn. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Epistemicity, evidentiality, and Theory of Mind (ToM). In Modality and Theory of Mind Elements across Languages [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 243], Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 37–66. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Melis, Chantal
2011 El cambio semántico, sus contextos y los verbos de suficiencia del español. Paper presented at the XIII Coloquio Internacional de Lingüística Iberrománica, 3–5 February, 2011, Leuven, Belgium.Google Scholar
Meisnitzer, Benjamin
2012 Modality in the Romance languages: Modal verbs and modal particles. In Modality and Theory of Mind Elements across Languages [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 243], Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 335–360. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, Sonja
2012 The distribution of knowledge in (un)acceptable questions. In Modality and Theory of Mind Elements across Languages [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 243], Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 147–210. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munro, Pamela
1999 Chickasaw subjecthood. In External Possession, Doris L. Payne & Immanuel Barshi (eds), 251–287. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nwachukwu, Akụjửọobi P
1987 The Argument Structure of Igbo Verbs [Lexicon Project Working Papers 18]. Cambridge MA: The Center for Cognitive Science, MIT.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R
2001 Mood and Modality, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, Anna
2000 Modality: Issues in the Semantics-pragmatics Interface [Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface 6]. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Portner, Paul
2012 Permission and choice. In Discourse and Grammar. From Sentence Types to Lexical Categories, Günther Grewendorf & Thomas Ede Zimmermann (eds), 43–68. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwager, Magdalena
2010 Modality and speech acts: Troubled by German ruhig. In Proceedings of the 17th Amsterdam Colloquium, Maria Aloni & Katrin Schulz (eds), 416–425. Amsterdam: ILLC.Google Scholar
Speas, Margret Jean
2004 Evidentiality, logophoricity, and the syntactic representation of pragmatic features. Lingua 114: 255–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Evidentials as generalized functional heads. In Edges, Heads, and Projections: Interface Properties [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 156], Anna-Maria Di Sciullo & Virginia Hill (eds), 127–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, Peter
2003 On the edge. In Peripheries, David Adger, Cecile De Cat & George Tsoulas (eds), 259–287. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Traugott Elisabeth
1989 On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65: 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Linden, An & Verstraete, Jean-Christoph
2011 Revisiting deontic modality and related categories: A conceptual map based on the study of English modal adjectives. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 150–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziegeler, Debra
2010 Semantic determinism and the grammaticalization of have to in English. A reassessment. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 11(1): 32–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar