Part of
Modes of Modality: Modality, typology, and universal grammar
Edited by Elisabeth Leiss and Werner Abraham
[Studies in Language Companion Series 149] 2014
► pp. 4386
Aboh, Enoch Oladé
2006Complementation in Saramaccan and Gungbe: The case of C-type modal particles. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 24(1): 1–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Abraham, Werner
2002Modal verbs: Epistemics in German and English. In Modality and its Interaction with the Verbal System [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 47], Sjef Barbiers, Frits Beukema & Wim van der Wurff (eds), 19–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011Preface. In Theory of Language. The Representational Function of Language, Karl Bühler, xii–xlvi. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012a(Inter)subjectification or foreign consciousness/Other’s mind alignment as synchronic and diachronic concepts of change? Conceptualizations and data fidelity. In Covert Patterns of Modality, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 24–78. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
2012bIllocutive Force is speaker and information source concern. What type of syntax does the representation of speaker deixis require? Templates vs. derivational structure? In Modality and Theory of Mind Elements across Languages [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs], Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 67–109. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Abraham, Werner & Leiss, Elisabeth
2012Introduction. In Covert Patterns of Modality, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 1–23. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2012A book review of Gabriele Diewald & Elena Smirnova (eds) 2010 Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European languages. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Studies in Language 36(2): 431–439.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark
1985The Mirror Principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 16(3): 373–415.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina
2003On finiteness as logophoric anchoring. In Temps et point de vue/Tense and Point of View, Jacqueline Guéron & Liliane Tasmovski (eds), 213–246. Paris: Université Paris X - Nanterre.Google Scholar
2006On the syntax of personal arguments. Lingua 116: 2023–2067. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boas, Franz
1911Handbook of American Indian Languages. Washington DC: GPO.Google Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric
2008Bare Syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bojadzhiev, Todor et al.
1999Syvremenen Bylgarski Ezik (Modern Bulgarian Language). Sofia: Petar Beron.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William
1994The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Bühler, Karl
[1934]2011Theory of Language. The Representational Function of Language. Transl. Donald Fraser Goodwin. 2nd rev. edn. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace & Nichols, Johanna
(eds) 1986Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology [Advances in Discourse Processes 20]. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1995Bare phrase structure. In Evolution and Revolution in Linguistic Theory, Hector Campos & Paula Kempchinsky (eds), 383–439. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
2001Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstovicz (ed.), 1–54. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2004Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 3, Adriana Belletti (ed.) 104–131. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2008On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, Robert Freidin, Carlos Peregrín Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), 133–66. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo & Rizzi, Luigi
2010The cartography of syntactic structures. In Oxford Handbook of Grammatical Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds) 51–65. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1976Aspect. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2000Evidentials: Semantics and history. In Evidentials: Turkic, Iranian and neighbouring languages, Lars Johanson & Bo Utas (eds), 1–12. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culy, Christopher
1994aAspects of logophoric marking. Linguistics 32: 1055–1094. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994bA note on logophoricity in Dogon. Journal of African Linguistics 15: 113–125.Google Scholar
1997Logophoric pronouns and point of view. Linguistics 35: 845–859. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Haan, Ferdinand
2001The place of inference within the evidential system. International Journal of American Linguistics 67(2): 193–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005Encoding speaker perspective: Evidentials. In Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories [Studies in Language Companion Series 72], Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges & David S. Rood (eds), 379–397. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1997Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1: 33–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enç, Mürvet
2004Rethinking past tense. In The Syntax of Time, Jacqueline Gueron & Jacqueline Lecarme (eds), 203–15. Camebridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fitneva, Stanka
2008The role of evidentiality in Bulgarian children’s reliability judgements. Journal of Child Language 35: 845–868. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franks, Steven
2006Another look at li placement in Bulgarian. The Linguistic Review 23: 161–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franks, Steven & Holloway King, Tracy
2000A Handbook of Slavic Clitics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor
1982Reportedness in Bulgarian: Category or stylistic variant? International Journal of Slavic Linguistics and Poetics 25–26: 149–163.Google Scholar
1986Evidentiality in the Balkans: Bulgarian, Macedonian, and Albanian. In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds),168–87. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
2001Hunting the elusive evidential: The third-person auxiliary as a Boojum in Bulgarian. In Of all the Slavs my Favorites: Studies in Honor of Howard Aronson on the Occasion of his 66th Birthday [Indiana Slavic Studies 12], Donald L. Dyer & Victor Friedman (eds), 203–230. Bloomington IN: Slavica.Google Scholar
Gül, Demet
2009Semantics of Turkish evidential -(I)ml?. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, Essays on Turkish Linguistics, Sıla Ay, Özgür Aydın, İclâl Ergenç, Seda Gökmen, Selçuk İşsever & Dilek Peçenek (eds), 177–186. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Ritter, Elizabeth
2002Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language 78(3): 482–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Izvorski, Roumyana
1997The present perfect as an epistemic modal. In SALT VII, A. Lawson & E. Cho (eds.), 222–239. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
[1957]1971Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. In Selected Writings II, Roman Jakobson, 130–47. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kiefer, Ferenc
1984Focus and modality. In Papers from the 6th Groningen Grammar Talks on ‘Topic, Focus, and Configurationality’, 6–8 April, 1984, Vol. 1, Werner Abraham & Sjaak de Mey (eds). GAGL 24: 55–81.Google Scholar
Koev, Todor
2011Evidentiality and temporal distance learning. In Proceedings of SALT 21, 115–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koopman, Hilda & Sportiche, Dominique
1989Pronouns, logical variables, and logophoricity in Abe. Linguistic Inquiry 20(4): 555–588.Google Scholar
Krapova, Iliyana
2001Subjunctives in Bulgarian and Modern Greek. In Comparative Syntax of Balkan Languages, Maria.-Luisa Rivero & Angela Ralli (eds), 105–127. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Leiss, Elisabeth
2012Epistemicity, evidentiality, and Theory of Mind (ToM). In Modality and Theory of Mind Elements across Languages [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 243], Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 37–66. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Frank
[1986]2001Mood and Modality. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Plungian, Vladimir
2001The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 349–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliana Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Roussou, Anna
2002The Extended Projection Principle as a condition on the tense dependency. In Subjects, Expletives, and the EPP, Peter Svenonius (ed.), 125–55. Oxford: UP.Google Scholar
Sells, Peter
1987Aspects of logophoricity. Linguistic Inquiry 18(3): 445–479.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann
2004The syntax of person, tense, and speech features. Rivista di Linguistica 16(1): 219–251.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann & Holmberg, Anders
2008Icelandic dative intervention: Person and number are separate probes. In Agreement restrictions, Roberta D'Alessandro, Susan Fischer & Gunnar H. Hrafnbjargarson (eds), 251–280. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan&Aksu, Ayhan
1982Tense, aspect, and modality in the use of the Turkish evidential. In Tense-aspect: Between Semantics and Pragmatics [Typological Studies in Language 1], Paul Hopper (ed.) 185–200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speas, Margaret
2004Evidentiality, logophoricity and the syntactic representation of pragmatic features. Lingua 114: 255–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speas, Margaret & Tenny, Carol
2003Configurational properties of point of view roles. In Anna Asymmetry in Grammar [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 57], Maria Di Sciullo (ed.), 315–343. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vainikka, Anne & Levy, Yonata
1999Empty subjects in Finnish and Hebrew. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17: 613–671. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willett, Thomas
1988A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 12(1): 51–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold
1977Hierarchies of person. In Papers from the Thirteenth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, Woodford A. Beach, Samuel E. Fox & Shulamith Philosoph (eds), 714–733. Chicago IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar