Anderson, Gregory D
S 2007 The Munda Verb. Typological Perspectives [Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 174.] Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benveniste, Émile
1946Structure des relations de personne dans le verbe. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique 46:1. Reprinted in Émile Benveniste 1966, 225–236.Google Scholar
1956La nature des pronoms. In For Roman Jakobson , Morris Halle et al. (eds). The Hague: Mouton. Reprinted in: Émile Benveniste 1966, 251–257.Google Scholar
1966 Problèmes de linguistique générale [Bibliothèque des Sciences Humaines, NRF, Éditions Gallimard]. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G
2000 Number . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daniel, Michael & Moravcsik, Edith
2011The associative plural. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online , Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, feature 36A. [URL]> (7 August 2012).
Hoffmann, Reverend J., S.J
1903 Mundari Grammar . Calcutta: Bengal Secretariat Press.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara, Andrus, Jennifer & Danielson, Andrew E
2006Mobility, indexicality, and the enregisterment of “Pittsburghese”. Journal of English Linguistics 34(2): 77–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2002 Thoughts on Grammaticalization, 2nd & revised edn. [Arbeitspapiere des Seminars für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Erfurt (ASSidUE), 9].
Lewis, M. Paul
(ed) 2009 Ethnologue: Languages of the World , 16th edn. Dallas TX: SIL International. [URL]
Malhotra, Veena
1982The Structure of Kharia: A Study of Linguistic Typology and Language Change. PhD. dissertation, Jawaharlal Nehru University.
Moravcsik, Edith
2003A semantic analysis of associative plurals. Studies in Language 27(3): 469–503. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peterson, John
2005There’s a grain of truth in every ‘myth’, or, Why the discussion of lexical classes in Mundari isn’t quite over yet. Linguistic Typology 9: 391–405.Google Scholar
2007Languages without nouns and verbs? An alternative to lexical classes in Kharia. In Old and New Perspectives on South Asian Languages. Grammar and Semantics. Papers growing out of the Fifth International Conference on South Asian Linguistics (ICOSAL-5), held at Moscow, Russia in July 2003 , Colin Masica (ed.), 274–303. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
2011a A Grammar of Kharia. A South Munda Language [Brill’s Studies in South and Southwest Asian Languages 1]. Leiden / Boston: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011b Kharia Texts. Glossed, Translated and Annotated [Language Description Heritage - Open Access Library]. [URL]
In press aParts of speech in Kharia A formal account. To appear in Flexible Word Classes: A Typological Study of Underspecified Parts-of-speech , Jan Rijkhoff & Eva van Lier (eds). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
In press bThe “totality” morpheme -may in Kharia . To appear in Felicitation Volume for Noman Zide, Ram Dayal Munda (ed.).
Pfeffer, Georg
1993Kharia totemism. Journal of the Indian Anthropological Society 28: 221–227.Google Scholar
Pinnow, Heinz-Jürgen
1959 Versuch einer historischen Lautlehre der Kharia-Sprache . Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
1965 Kharia-Texte (Prosa und Poesie) . Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
1966A comparative study of the verb in the Munda languages. In Studies in Comparative Austroasiatic Linguistics [Indo-Iranian Monographs V], Norman H. Zide (ed.). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Roy, Sarat Chandra & Roy, Ramesh Chandra
1937 The Khâṛiâs . Ranchi.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1976 [1986a]] Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Features and Projections , Pieter Muysken & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 163–232. Dordrecht: Foris. [Reprint from R.M.W. Dixon, Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages , Pieter Muysken & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 112–171. Canberra ACT: Australian Institute of Aboriginal [and Torres Straits Islander] Studies.]Google Scholar
1981Case marking and the nature of language. Australian Journal of Linguistics: Journal of the Australian Linguistic Society 227–247. DOI logo
1986bNoun phrase categorial markedness and syntactic parametricization. Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, SUNY Buffalo, October, 1985, 337–361. Columbus OH: Department of Linguistics, Ohio State University.
1987Cognitive implications of a referential hierarchy. In Social and Functional Approaches to Language and Thought , Maya Hickmann (ed.), 125–164. Orlando FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
2003Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication 23: 193–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Krifka, Manfred
2022. Number, Numbers and the Mass/Count Distinction in Daakie (Ambrym, Vanuatu). In Measurements, Numerals and Scales,  pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Kruspe, Nicole & Niclas Burenhult
2019. Chapter 12. Pronouns in affinal avoidance registers. In The Social Dynamics of Pronominal Systems [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 304],  pp. 289 ff. DOI logo
Peterson, John
2015. Introduction – advances in the study of Munda languages. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 2:2  pp. 149 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.