Syntactic change
Between universal grammar and fuzzy grammar
Two diametrically opposed positions on syntactic change have wide currency in the literature. The first is the classical position of mainstream formal linguistics. In this view, UG-based strategies lead to a dramatically rapid cascade of seemingly unrelated diachronic changes. The second view has been developed primarily in the context of functional linguistics and associated statistical approaches. In this way of looking at things, diachronic change is ‘fuzzy’, in the sense that syntactic categories and constructions undergo a gradual evolution. In this paper I argue that neither position is correct. Syntactic change is discrete and abrupt, as is maintained by most formal syntacticians. However, we must abandon the view that such change can be interpreted in terms of UG-provided parameters or cues.
References (75)
References
Amritavalli, Rita. 2004. Experiencer datives in Kannada. In
Non-nominative Subjects,
Vol.1 [Typological Studies in Language 60], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baker, Carl Lee. 1991. The syntax of English not: The limits of core grammar.
Linguistic Inquiry
22: 387–429.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baker, Mark C. 2001.
The Atoms of Language: The Mind's Hidden Rules of Grammar
. New York NY: Basic Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bhaskararao, Peri & Subbarao, Karumuri Venkata 2004. Preface. In
Non-nominative Subjects,
Vol. 1 [Typological Studies in Language 60], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), ix–xii. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bickel, Balthasar. 2004. The syntax of experiences in the Himalayas. In
Non-nominative subjects,
Vol. 1 [Typological Studies in Language 60], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 77–112. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blevins, James P. To appear. Periphrasis as syntactic exponence. In
Patterns in Paradigms
, Farrell Ackerman, James P. Blevins & G.S. Stump (eds). Stanford CA: CSLI.
Boeckx, Cedric. 2011. Approaching parameters from below. In
Biolinguistic Approaches to Language Evolution and Variation
, Anna Maria Di Sciullo & Cedric Boeckx (eds), 205–221. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Borer, Hagit. 1984.
Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages,
Vol. 13. Dordrecht: Foris.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Borsley, Robert D. & Rivero, Maria-Luisa. 1994. Clitic auxiliaries and incorporation in Polish.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory
12: 373–422.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Borsley, Robert D., Rivero, Maria-Luisa & Stephens, Janig. 1996. Long head movement in Breton. In
The Syntax of the Celtic Languages
, Robert D. Borsley & Ian Roberts (eds), 53–74. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brinton, Laurel J., & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2005.
Lexicalization and Language Change
. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1981.
Lectures on Government and Binding
. Dordrecht: Foris.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Churchward, Clerk Maxwell. 1953.
Tongan Grammar
. London: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999.
Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective
. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Comrie, Bernard. 2004. Oblique-case subjects in Tsez. In
Non-nominative Subjects,
Vol. 1 [Typological Studies in Language 60], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 113–127. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crain, Stephen. 2012.
The Emergence of Meaning
. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, William. 1995. Autonomy and functionalist linguistics.
Language
71: 490–532. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, William. 2000.
Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach
. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Denison, David. 2001. Gradience and linguistic change. In
Historical Linguistics 1999: Selected papers from the Fourteenth International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Vancouver 9–13 August 1999
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 215], Laurel Brinton (ed.), 119–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Denison, David. 2002. History of the sort of construction family. Paper presented at ICCG2: Second International Conference on Construction Grammar, Helsinki.
Derbyshire, Desmond C. 1985.
Hixkaryana and Linguistic Typology
. Arlington TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dresher, B. Elan. 1999. Charting the learning path: Cues to parameter setting.
Linguistic Inquiry
30: 27–67. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dryer, Matthew S. 1991. SVO languages and the OV: VO typology.
Journal of Linguistics
27: 443–482. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dryer, Matthew S. 1992. The Greenbergian word order correlations.
Language
68: 81–138. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Emonds, Joseph E. 1986. Grammatically deviant prestige constructions. In
A Festschrift for Sol Saporta
, Michael Brame, Heles Contreras & Frederick J. Newmeyer (eds), 93–131. Seattle WA: Noit Amrofer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ernst, Thomas. 1992. The phrase structure of English negation.
Linguistic Review
9: 109–144. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fan, Xianlong. 2008. A changing target language: Trends in American English as viewed from the EFL perspective of China.
English Today
96: 34–41.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Franks, Steven. 1995.
Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax
. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gilligan, Gary Martin. 1987. A Cross-linguistic Approach to the Pro-drop Parameter. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin. 1999. Why is grammaticalization irreversible?
Linguistics
37: 1043–1068. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin. 2002.
Understanding Morphology
. London: Arnold.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hawkins, John A. 1994.
A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency
. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hawkins, John A. 1995. Argument-predicate structure in grammar and performance: A comparison of English and German. In
Insights in Germanic Linguistics
I, Irmegard Rauch & Gerald F. Carr (eds), 127–144. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hermon, Gabriella. 2001. Non-canonically marked A/S in Imbabura Quechua. In
Non-canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects
[Typological Studies in Language 46], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, R.M.W. Dixon & Masayuki Onishi (eds), 149–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Holmberg, Anders. 2005. Stylistic fronting. In
The Blackwell Companion to Syntax
, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 530–563. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Holmberg, Anders. 2010. Parameters in minimalist theory: The case of Scandinavian.
Theoretical Linguistics
36: 1–48. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Holmberg, Anders & Platzack, Christer. 1995.
The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax
. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, Ray. 1972.
Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar
. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kayne, Richard S. 1994.
The Antisymmetry of Syntax
. Cambridge M: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kayne, Richard S. 2005.
Movement and Silence
. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kim, Jong-Bok. 2000.
The Grammar of Negation: A Constraint-based Approach
. Stanford CA: CSLI.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koopman, Hilda. 1984.
The Syntax of Verbs: From Verb Movement Rules in the Kru Languages to Universal Grammar
. Dordrecht: Foris.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kortmann, Bernd & König, Ekkehard. 1992. Categorial reanalysis: The case of deverbal prepositions.
Linguistics
30: 671–697. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kroch, Anthony S. 1994. Morphosyntactic variation. In
Papers from the 30th Regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society,
Part 2:
The Parasession on Variation in Linguistic Theory
, Katharine Beals, Jeanette Denot, Robert Knippen, Lynette Melnar, Hisami Suzuki & Erica Zeinfeld (eds), 180–201. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labov, William. 1972.
Language in the inner city
. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labov, William. 1982. Building on empirical foundations. In
Perspectives on Historical Linguistics
, Winfred Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds), 17–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lightfoot, David W. 1993. Why UG needs a learning theory: Triggering verb movement. In
Historical Linguistics: Problems and Perspectives
, Charles Jones (ed.), 190–214. London: Longman. Reprinted in Battye, Adrian & Roberts, Ian (eds). 1995.
Clause Structure and Languages Change,
131–152. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lightfoot, David W. 1999.
The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change, and Evolution
. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lightfoot, David W. 2006.
How New Languages Emerge
. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lightfoot, David W. & Westergaard, Marit. 2007. Language acquisition and language change: Interrelationships.
Language and Linguistics Compass
1: 396–415. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mistry, P.J. 2004. Subjecthood of non-nominatives in Gujarati. In
Non-nominative Subjects,
Vol. 2 [Typological Studies in Language 61], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 1–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1998.
Language Form and Language Function
. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2006. Negation and modularity. In
Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning: Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn
[Studies in Language Companion Series 80], Betty Birner & Gregory Ward (eds), 247–268. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Onishi, Masayuki 2001. Non-canonically marked A/S in Bengali. In
Non-canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects
[Typological Studies in Language 46], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, R.M.W. Dixon & Masayuki Onishi (eds), 113–147. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pateman, Trevor. 1987.
Language in Mind and Language in Society
. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Paul, Hermann. 1880/1920.
Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte
. Halle: Niemeyer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Payne, John R. 1985. Negation. In
Language Typology and Syntactic Description
. Vol. I:
Clause Structure
, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 197–242. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pintzuk, Susan. 1993. The distribution and syntax of Old English adverbs. Ms, New York University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Plank, Frans. 2012.
Das grammatische Raritätenkabinett
. <[URL]>
Rizzi, Luigi. 1978. Violations of the wh-island constraint in Italian and the subjacency condition. In
Montreal Working Papers in Linguistics
, Colette Dubuisson, David Lightfoot & Yves Charles Morin (eds), 155–190. Montreal: L'association linguistique de Montreal. Reprinted in Rizzi, Luigi. 1982.
Issues in Italian Syntax,
49–76 Dordrecht: Foris.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roberts, Ian. 1993.
Verbs and Diachronic Syntax: A Comparative History of English and French
. Dordrecht: Kluwer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roberts, Ian. 2007.
Diachronic Syntax
. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Siewierska, Anna. 2005. Verbal person marking. In
The World Atlas of Language Structures
, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 414–417. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sobin, Nicholas. 1997. Agreement, default rules, and grammatical viruses.
Linguistic Inquiry
28: 318–143.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sridhar, Shikaripur N. 1976. Dative subjects, rule government, and relational grammar.
Studies in the Linguistic Sciences
6: 130–151.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Subbarao, Karumuri Venkata, & Bhaskararao, Peri. 2004. Non-nominative subjects in Telugu. In
Non-nominative Subjects,
Vol. 2 [Typological Studies in Language 61], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 161–196. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van der Auwera, Johan. 1984. Subject and non-subject asymmetries in the relativization of embedded NPs. In
Sentential Complementation
, Wim De Geest & Yvan Putseys (eds), 257–269. Dordrecht: Foris.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Westergaard, Marit. 2009. Many small catastrophes: Gradualism in microparametric perspective. In
Historical Syntax and Linguistic Theory
, Paola Crisma & Giuseppe Longobardi (eds), 76–90. Oxford: OUP.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yang, Charles D. 2004. Universal Grammar, statistics, or both?
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
8: 451–456. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Denis, Derek
2017.
The Development ofAnd Stuffin Canadian English: A Longitudinal Study of Apparent Grammaticalization.
Journal of English Linguistics 45:2
► pp. 157 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
D. M. Smith, Andrew, Graeme Trousdale & Richard Waltereit
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
2014.
La réanalyse syntaxique et le conflit formaliste-fonctionnaliste en linguistique.
Langages N° 196:4
► pp. 37 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.