Cover not available
Part of
The Sociolinguistics of Grammar
Edited by Tor A. Åfarli and Brit Mæhlum
[Studies in Language Companion Series 154] 2014
► pp. 171–190

Norwegian discourse ellipses in the left periphery – interacting structural and semantic restrictions

In Norwegian discourse ellipses, elements in the left edge of the clause are most frequently elided. Yet, a topic drop analysis is argued to be empirically too narrow, since occasionally the whole C-domain is silent. I propose an analysis which combines semantic and structural restrictions: Ellipsis must obey the semantic recoverability condition. On the structural side, the whole C-domain can be unrealized only when all the elements are part of the same Agree-relation. If the constituent in (spec,CP) is not part of this agreement system, e.g. if the object is topicalized, ellipsis of the whole domain is illicit. Ellipsis of only (spec,CP) is possible in any case, given that the semantic identity criteria are fulfilled.
Published online: 16 April 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.154.09nyg
References (30)
References
Cardinaletti, Anna. 1990. Subject/object asymmetries in German null-topic constructions and the status of spec CP. In Grammar in Progress , Joan Mascarò & Marina Nespor (eds), 75–84. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1964. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory . The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language , Michael Kenstovicz (ed.), 1–54. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2002. On Nature and Language, Adriana Belletti & Luigi Rizzi (eds). Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Approaching UG from below. In Interfaces + Recursion Language? , Uli Sauerland & Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds), 1–29. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2008. On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud , Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), 133–166. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, David. 2008. Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics, 6th edn. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K. 1974. The Role of Topic and Comment in Linguistic Theory. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 531–574.Google Scholar
Jouitteau, Mélanie. 2004. Gestures as expletives : Multichannel syntax. In WCCF 23 Proceedings , Gina Garding & Mimu Tsujimura (eds), 104–114. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
Lobeck, Anne. 1995. Ellipsis: Functional Heads, Licensing, and Identification . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
McShane, Marjorie. 2005. A Theory of Ellipsis . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason. 2001. The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands, and the Theory of Ellipsis . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2004. Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 661–738. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mörnsjö, Maria. 2002. V1 Declaratives in Spoken Swedish. PhD dissertation, Lund University.Google Scholar
Napoli, Donna Jo. 1982. Initial material deletion. Glossa 16: 85–111.Google Scholar
Nygård, Mari. 2013. Discourse ellipsis in spontaneously spoken Norwegian. Clausal architecture and licensing conditions. Doctoral dissertation, NTNU, Trondheim.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Radical Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.), 223–56. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Progovac, Ljiljana, Paesana, Kate, Casielles, Eugenia & Barton, Ellen (eds). 2006. The Syntax of Nonsententials: Multidisciplinary Perspectives [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 93]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radford, Andrew. 2004. Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the Structure of English . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1981. Pragmatics and linguistics. An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27: 53–94.Google Scholar
Richards, Mark D. 2007. On feature inheritance: An argument from the phase impenetrability condition. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 563–572. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17:501–557.
. 1994. Early null subjects and root null subjects. In Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 8], Teun Hoekstra & Bonnie D. Schwartz (eds), 151–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar. A Handbook in Generative Syntax , Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Á. 1989. Verbal Syntax and Case in Icelandic. PhD dissertation, Lund University. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. & Maling, Joan. 2010. The empty left edge condition. In Exploring Crash-Proof Grammars [Language Faculty and Beyond 3], Michael T. Putnam (ed.), 57–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Conditions on argument drop. Linguistic Inquiry 42: 267–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Travis, Lisa. 1984. Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar