Cover not available
Part of
Usage-based Approaches to Japanese Grammar: Towards the understanding of human language
Edited by Kaori Kabata and Tsuyoshi Ono
[Studies in Language Companion Series 156] 2014
► pp. 55–84

Grammar of the internal expressive sentences in Japanese

Observations and explorations

‘Internal expressive sentences’ such as a! itai ‘Oh, it hurts,’ or aa yokatta ‘Oh, I’m so happy!,’ reveal directly what the speaker perceives or senses internally, and contrast sharply with ‘descriptive sentences,’ such as taroo wa kuma o uchitometa ‘Taro shot the bear.’ This distinction has been noted in both Japanese and European languages but has not received much attention in linguistics in general. This paper explores this neglected type of sentence in terms of their morphosyntactic patterns (co-occurrence with outcry vocalization, such as a!, aa, waa, restricted predicate forms, the clipped adjective form, and inability to code an experiencer), semantic primitives labeled as Experience, Stimulus and Receptor, and extralinguistic factors based on neurological states of perception, emotion and feeling.
Published online: 10 June 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.156.07iwa
References (50)
References
Bally, Charles. 1965[1925]. Le langage et la vie . Genève: Droz.Google Scholar
Basbaum, Allan I. & Jessell, Thomas M. 2000. The perception of pain. In Principles of Neural Science (4th edition), Eric R. Kandel, James Schwartz & Thomas M. Jessell (eds), 472-491. New York NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika. 2006. Bühler, Karl (1879-1963). In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics , 2nd edn, Keith Brown (ed.), 145-147. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Besnier, Nico. 1990. Language and affect. Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 419-451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bühler, Karl. 1933. Ausdruckstheorie. Das system an der Geschichte aufgezeigt . Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. & Hopper, Paul. 2001. Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure [Typological Studies in Language 45]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Nick. 2004. Databases of expressive speech. Journal of Chinese Language and Computing 14(4): 295-304.Google Scholar
. 2005. Getting to the heart of the matter: Speech as the expression of affect, rather than just text or language. Language Resources and Evaluation 39(1): 109-118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Subject and Topic , Charles N. Li (ed.). New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time – The Flow and Displacement of Consciousness Experience in Speaking and Writing . Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Daneš, František. 1994. Involvement with language and in language. Journal of Pragmatics 22: 251-64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Damasio, Antonio. Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain . New York NY: Harcourt.
Dodd, Jane & Castellucci, Vincent F. 1991. Smell and taste: The chemical senses (Ch. 34). In Kandel, Schwartz & Jessell> (eds), 512-529.
Dong, Quang Phuc. 1971. English sentences without overt grammatical subject. In Studies out in Left Field: Defamatory Essays Presented to James D. McCawley on his 33rd or 34th Birthday , Arnold M. Zwicky, Peter H. Salus, Robert I. Binick and Anthony L. Vanek (eds), 3-10. Edmonton: Linguistic Research Inc. Reprinted in 1992 by John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles. 1988. The mechanisms of ‘Constructional Grammar’. BLS 14: 35-55.Google Scholar
Ghez, Claude. 1991. The control of movement (Ch. 35). In Kandel, Schwartz & Jessell (eds), 533-547.
Goffman, Erving. 1983[1981]. Forms of Talk . Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Haiman, John (ed.). 1985. Iconicity in Syntax [Typological Studies in Language 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 1994. Ritualization and the development of language. In Perspectives of Grammaticalization [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 109], William Pagliuca (ed.), 3-28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Innis, Robert E. 1982. Karl Bühler - Semiotic Foundations of Language Theory . New York NY: Plenum Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith. 1982. Language and affect: Some cross-cultural issues. In Georgetown University Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics , Heidi Byrnes (eds), 31-47. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi. 2006. The structure of internal state expressions in Japanese and Korean. In Japanese/Korean Linguistics , Timothy J. Vance & Kimberly A. Jones (eds), 331-342.  Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1960. Linguistics and poetics. In Style in Language , Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), 350-377. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Kandel, Eric, Schwartz, James A. & Jessell, Thomas M. (eds). 1991. Principles of Neural Science , 3rd edn. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Kay, Paul & Fillmore, Charles. 1999. Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalization: The what’s X doing Y? construction. Language 75: 1-33 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kinsui, Satoshi. 2003. Vaacharu nihongo: Yakuwarigo no nazo (Virtual Japanese: A mystery of role specified language). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The structure of the Japanese language . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki. 1990. The categorical and the thetic judgment reconsidered. In Mind, Meaning and Metaphysics. The Philosophy and Theory of Language of Anton Marty , Kevin Mulligan (ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1992. Japanese Syntax and Semantics: Collected Papers . Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics , Vol. 1. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 1982. Deixis and subjectivity: Loquor ergo sum? In Speech, Place and Action: Studies in Deixis and Related Topics , Robert J. Jarvella & Wolfgang Klein (eds), 101-24. New York NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Masunaga, Kiyoko. 1988. Case deletion and discourse context. In Papers from the Second International Workshop on Japanese Syntax, William J. Poser (ed.), 145-156. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Matsushita, Daisaburo. 1978[1930]. Kaisen hyoojun nihon bunpoo (teisei saihan) (Revised Standard Japanese Grammar (corrected and re-published)). Tokyo: Bensei-sha.Google Scholar
Maynard, Senko K. 2000. Jooi no gengo-gaku: ‘Ba-kooshoo-ron’ to nihongo hyoogen no patosu . Tokyo: Kuroshio shuppan.Google Scholar
. 2002. Linguistic Emotivity. Centrality of Place, the Topic-comment Dynamic, and an Ideology of Pathos in Japanese Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 97]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Linguistic Creativity in Japanese discourse: Exploring the Multiplicity of Self, Perspectives, and Voice [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 159]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mio, Isago. 2003[1948]. Kokugohoo bunshoo ron (A theory of Japanese sentences). Tokyo: Hitsuji-shoboo.Google Scholar
Morishige, Satoshi. 1971. Nihonbunpoo no shomondai (Issues in Japanese grammar). Tokyo: Kasama shoin.Google Scholar
Nathan, Peter W. 2004. Human nervous system. In Encyclopædia Britannica . [URL] (11 August, 2004).Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor & Schieffelin, Bambi. 1989. Language has a heart. TEXT  9(1): 7-25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Onoe, Keisuke. 2001. Bunpoo to imi I (Grammar and meaning I). Tokyo: Kuroshio-shuppan.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R. 1986. Mood and Modality . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M. & Zwicky, Arnold M. Speech-act distinctions in syntax. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description: Clause Structure , Timothy Shopen (ed.). Cambridge: CUP.
Sakuma, Kanae. 1952. Gendai nihongohoo no kenkyuu . Tokyo: Koosei-sha Koosei-kaku.Google Scholar
. 1967. Nihon-teki hyoogen no gengo kagaku (Language science of Japanese expression). Tokyo: Koosei-sha Koosei-kaku.Google Scholar
Sato, Masahiko. 2004. Noo-shinkei to koo doo (The brain-nervous system and behavior). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Sugiura, Katsumi. 2005. ‘Samu!’ ‘uma!’ nado ni mirareru bunpooka ni kansuru koosatsu: Koobun bunpoo no shiten. The Japanese Cognitive Linguistics Association Conference Handbook , 153-156.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev S. 1962[1934]. Thought and Language , trans. by Eugenia Hanfmann & Gertrude Vakar. Cambridge MA & New York NY: The MIT Press & John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Yamada, Yoshio. 1954[1936]. Nihon bunpōgaku gairon (Introduction to Japanese grammar). Tokyo: Hobunkan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Akita, Kimi
2021. A typology of depiction marking. Studies in Language 45:4 ► pp. 865 ff. DOI logo
Laury, Ritva, Tsuyoshi Ono & Ryoko Suzuki
2019. Questioning the clause as a crosslinguistic unit in grammar and interaction. Studies in Language 43:2 ► pp. 364 ff. DOI logo
Laury, Ritva, Tsuyoshi Ono & Ryoko Suzuki
2021. Questioning the clause as a crosslinguistic unit in grammar and interaction. In Usage-based and Typological Approaches to Linguistic Units [Benjamins Current Topics, 114], ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Koike, Chisato
2015. Affect-Loaded Questions in Japanese Storytelling: An Analysis of Grammar, Prosody, and Body Movements of Story Recipients’ Questions. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 05:05 ► pp. 481 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.