References
Bally, Charles
1965[1925] Le langage et la vie . Genève: Droz.Google Scholar
Basbaum, Allan I. & Jessell, Thomas M
2000The perception of pain. In Principles of Neural Science (4th edition), Eric R. Kandel, James Schwartz & Thomas M. Jessell (eds), 472-491. New York NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika
2006Bühler, Karl (1879-1963). In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics , 2nd edn, Keith Brown (ed.), 145-147. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Besnier, Nico
1990Language and affect. Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 419-451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bühler, Karl
1933 Ausdruckstheorie. Das system an der Geschichte aufgezeigt . Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. & Hopper, Paul
2001 Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure [Typological Studies in Language 45]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Nick
2004Databases of expressive speech. Journal of Chinese Language and Computing 14(4): 295-304.Google Scholar
2005Getting to the heart of the matter: Speech as the expression of affect, rather than just text or language. Language Resources and Evaluation 39(1): 109-118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L
1976Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Subject and Topic , Charles N. Li (ed.). New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1994 Discourse, Consciousness, and Time – The Flow and Displacement of Consciousness Experience in Speaking and Writing . Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Daneš, František
1994Involvement with language and in language. Journal of Pragmatics 22: 251-64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Damasio, Antonio
Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain . New York NY: Harcourt.
Dodd, Jane & Castellucci, Vincent F
1991Smell and taste: The chemical senses (Ch. 34). In Kandel, Schwartz & Jessell> (eds), 512-529.
Dong, Quang Phuc
1971English sentences without overt grammatical subject. In Studies out in Left Field: Defamatory Essays Presented to James D. McCawley on his 33rd or 34th Birthday , Arnold M. Zwicky, Peter H. Salus, Robert I. Binick and Anthony L. Vanek (eds), 3-10. Edmonton: Linguistic Research Inc. Reprinted in 1992 by John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles
1988The mechanisms of ‘Constructional Grammar’. BLS 14: 35-55.Google Scholar
Ghez, Claude
1991The control of movement (Ch. 35). In Kandel, Schwartz & Jessell (eds), 533-547.
Goffman, Erving
1983[1981] Forms of Talk . Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Haiman, John
(ed.) 1985 Iconicity in Syntax [Typological Studies in Language 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1994Ritualization and the development of language. In Perspectives of Grammaticalization [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 109], William Pagliuca (ed.), 3-28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Innis, Robert E
1982 Karl Bühler - Semiotic Foundations of Language Theory . New York NY: Plenum Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith
1982Language and affect: Some cross-cultural issues. In Georgetown University Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics , Heidi Byrnes (eds), 31-47. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi
2006The structure of internal state expressions in Japanese and Korean. In Japanese/Korean Linguistics , Timothy J. Vance & Kimberly A. Jones (eds), 331-342.  Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1960Linguistics and poetics. In Style in Language , Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), 350-377. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Kandel, Eric, Schwartz, James A. & Jessell, Thomas M
(eds) 1991 Principles of Neural Science , 3rd edn. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Kay, Paul & Fillmore, Charles
1999Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalization: The what’s X doing Y? construction. Language 75: 1-33 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kinsui, Satoshi
2003 Vaacharu nihongo: Yakuwarigo no nazo (Virtual Japanese: A mystery of role specified language). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu
1973 The structure of the Japanese language . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki
1990The categorical and the thetic judgment reconsidered. In Mind, Meaning and Metaphysics. The Philosophy and Theory of Language of Anton Marty , Kevin Mulligan (ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992 Japanese Syntax and Semantics: Collected Papers . Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C
1983 Pragmatics . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1977 Semantics , Vol. 1. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1982Deixis and subjectivity: Loquor ergo sum? In Speech, Place and Action: Studies in Deixis and Related Topics , Robert J. Jarvella & Wolfgang Klein (eds), 101-24. New York NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Masunaga, Kiyoko
1988Case deletion and discourse context. In Papers from the Second International Workshop on Japanese Syntax, William J. Poser (ed.), 145-156. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Matsushita, Daisaburo
1978[1930] Kaisen hyoojun nihon bunpoo (teisei saihan) (Revised Standard Japanese Grammar (corrected and re-published)). Tokyo: Bensei-sha.Google Scholar
Maynard, Senko K
2000 Jooi no gengo-gaku: ‘Ba-kooshoo-ron’ to nihongo hyoogen no patosu . Tokyo: Kuroshio shuppan.Google Scholar
2007 Linguistic Creativity in Japanese discourse: Exploring the Multiplicity of Self, Perspectives, and Voice [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 159]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mio, Isago
2003[1948]  Kokugohoo bunshoo ron (A theory of Japanese sentences). Tokyo: Hitsuji-shoboo.Google Scholar
Morishige, Satoshi
1971 Nihonbunpoo no shomondai (Issues in Japanese grammar). Tokyo: Kasama shoin.Google Scholar
Nathan, Peter W
2004Human nervous system. In Encyclopædia Britannica . [URL] (11 August, 2004).Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor & Schieffelin, Bambi
1989Language has a heart. TEXT  9(1): 7-25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Onoe, Keisuke
2001 Bunpoo to imi I (Grammar and meaning I). Tokyo: Kuroshio-shuppan.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R
1986 Mood and Modality . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M. & Zwicky, Arnold M
Speech-act distinctions in syntax. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description: Clause Structure , Timothy Shopen (ed.) Cambridge CUP
Sakuma, Kanae
1952 Gendai nihongohoo no kenkyuu . Tokyo: Koosei-sha Koosei-kaku.Google Scholar
1967 Nihon-teki hyoogen no gengo kagaku (Language science of Japanese expression). Tokyo: Koosei-sha Koosei-kaku.Google Scholar
Sato, Masahiko
2004 Noo-shinkei to koo doo (The brain-nervous system and behavior). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Sugiura, Katsumi
2005. ‘Samu!’ ‘uma!’ nado ni mirareru bunpooka ni kansuru koosatsu: Koobun bunpoo no shiten. The Japanese Cognitive Linguistics Association Conference Handbook , 153-156.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev S
1962[1934] Thought and Language , trans. by Eugenia Hanfmann & Gertrude Vakar. Cambridge MA & New York NY: The MIT Press & John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Yamada, Yoshio
1954[1936] Nihon bunpōgaku gairon (Introduction to Japanese grammar). Tokyo: Hobunkan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Akita, Kimi
2021. A typology of depiction marking. Studies in Language 45:4  pp. 865 ff. DOI logo
Koike, Chisato
2015. Affect-Loaded Questions in Japanese Storytelling: An Analysis of Grammar, Prosody, and Body Movements of Story Recipients’ Questions. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 05:05  pp. 481 ff. DOI logo
Laury, Ritva, Tsuyoshi Ono & Ryoko Suzuki
2019. Questioning the clause as a crosslinguistic unit in grammar and interaction. Studies in Language 43:2  pp. 364 ff. DOI logo
Laury, Ritva, Tsuyoshi Ono & Ryoko Suzuki
2021. Questioning the clause as a crosslinguistic unit in grammar and interaction. In Usage-based and Typological Approaches to Linguistic Units [Benjamins Current Topics, 114],  pp. 123 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.