Cover not available
Part of
Usage-based Approaches to Japanese Grammar: Towards the understanding of human language
Edited by Kaori Kabata and Tsuyoshi Ono
[Studies in Language Companion Series 156] 2014
► pp. 85–108

Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and Japanese grammar

A functional approach

This survey study intends to show the benefits of adopting the functional linguistic perspectives of emphasizing the non-referential and emotive/subjective aspects of language, which are largely neglected in mainstream formalist linguistics. Specifically, this paper will first point out the fact that both Japanese linguist Haga and French linguist Benveniste independently proposed very similar dichotomies, juttei vs. dentatsu (Haga 1954) and subjectivity vs. intersubjectivity (Benveniste 1971[1958]) for their analyses of the non-propositional parts of language. Subsequently, drawing upon published studies, this paper will point out the relevance of these two dichotomies to syntactic organization (predicate order in particular), soliloquy and dialogue (or mental and speech act) dyad, and diachronic change (namely, the unidirectionality in grammaticalization from subjectification > intersubjectification (Traugott 2003).
Published online: 10 June 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.156.08shi
References (86)
References
Akatsuka, Noriko. 1978. Another look at no, koto, and to: Epistemology and complementizer choice in Japanese. In Problems in Japanese Syntax and Semantics , John Hinds & Irwin Howard (eds), 178-212. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
. 1979. Epistemology, Japanese syntax, and linguistic theory. Papers in Japanese Linguistics 6: 7-28.Google Scholar
. 1985. Conditionals and epistemic scale. Language 61: 625-639. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ariel, Mira. 1998. Mapping so-called ‘pragmatic’ phenomena according to ‘linguistic-extralinguistic’ distinction. In Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, Vol. II: Case Studies [Studies in Language Companion Series 42] Michael Darnell, Edith A. Moravcsik, Michael Noonan, Frederick J. Newmeyer & Kathleen Wheatley (eds), 11-38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by Itself . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Melissa. 1999. Lexis, grammar and grammatical change. In Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, Vol. II: Case Studies [Studies in Language Companion Series 42] Michael Darnell, Edith A. Moravcsik, Michael Noonan, Frederick J. Newmeyer & Kathleen Wheatley (eds), 39-58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benveniste, Emile. 1958 [Tr. 1971]. Problems in General Linguistics , trans. by Mary Elizabeth Meek. Coral Gables FL: University of Miami PressGoogle Scholar
Binnick, Robert I. 1991. Time and the Verb: A Guide to Tense and Aspect . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bühler, Karl. 1934[Tr. 1990]. Theory of Language: The Representational Function of Language , trans. by Donald Fraser Goodwin. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. & Pagliuca, William. 1985. Cross-linguistic comparison and the development of grammatical meaning. In Historical Semantics: Historical Word-Formation , Jacek Fisiak (ed.), 59-83. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World . Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cain, Mark J. 2002. Fodor: Language, Mind and Philosophy [Key Contemporary Thinkers]. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective [Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cook, Haruko Minegishi. 1989. The sentence-final particle ne as a tool for cooperation in Japanese conversation. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 1: 29-44.Google Scholar
Duchan, Judith F., Bruder, Gail A. & Hewitt, Lynn E. 1995. Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Approach . Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan. 2004. The Structure of Time: Language, Meaning and Temporal Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing 12]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finegan, Edward. 1995. Subjectivity and subjectivisation: An introduction. In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives , Stein Dieter & Susan Wright (eds), 1-15. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry. 1983. The Modularity of Mind . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Foley, William & Van Valin Jr., Robert D. 1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Fujii, Seiko. 2000. Incipient decategorization of MONO and grammaticalization of speaker attitude in Japanese discourse. In Pragmatic Markers and Propositional Attitude [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 79], Gisle Andersen & Thorstein Fretheim (eds), 85-118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givόn, Talmy. 1982. Logic vs. pragmatics, with human language as the referee: Toward an empirically viable epistemology. Journal of Pragmatics 6: 81-113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givόn, T. 1995. Functionalism and Grammar . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haga, Yasushi. 1954. Chinjutsu to wa nanimono? Kokugo Kokubun 23: 47-61.Google Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto. 2003. Joint Utterance Construction in Japanese Conversation [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 12]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees. 2005 [1989]. Layers and operators in functional grammar. In Crucial Readings in Functional Grammar , Matthew P. Anstey & J. Lachlan Mackenzie (eds), 1-40. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1997. Dispersed verbal predicates in vernacular written narrative. In Directions in Functional Linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series 36], Akio Kamio (ed.), 1-18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi. 1993. Subjectivity in Grammar and Discourse: Theoretical Considerations and a Case Study of Japanese Spoken Discourse [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 12]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kamio, Akio. 1997. Territory of Information . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1987. Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse, Empathy . Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki. 1973. Where epistemology, style and grammar meet: A case study from Japanese. In A Festschrift for Morris Halle , Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky, 377-391. New York NY: Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar , Vol. II. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Laury, Ritva & Ono, Tsuyoshi. 2005. Data is data and model is model: You don’t discard the data that doesn’t fit your model! Language 81(1): 218-225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N, 1983. Principles of Pragmatics . London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lyons, John, 1977. Semantics , Vol. 2. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 1982. Deixis and subjectivity: Loquor, ergo sum? In Speech, Place, and Action , Robert J. Jarvella & Wolfgang Klein (eds), 101-124. New York NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
. 1995. Linguistics Semantics: An Introduction . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCawley, Noriko A. 1978. Epistemology and Japanese syntax: Complementizer choice. CLS 14: 272-284.Google Scholar
Maynard, Senko K. 1993. Discourse Modality Subjectivity, Emotion and Voice in Japanese Language [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 24]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Linguistic Emotivity. Centrality of Place, the Topic-Comment Dynamic, and an Ideology of Pathos in Japanese Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 97], Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Minami, Fujio. 1974. Gendai Nihongo no Koozoo Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.Google Scholar
Mizutani, Osamu. 1981. Japanese: The Spoken Language in Japanese Life . Tokyo: Japan Times.Google Scholar
Morishige Satoshi. 1971. Nihon Bumpoo no Sho-mondai . Tokyo: Kasama Shoin.Google Scholar
Moriyama, Takuro. 1997. 'Hitorigoto' o megutte. Nihongo Bumpoo: Taikei to Hoohoo , Yoshiaki Kawabata & Yoshio Nitta (eds), 173-188. Tokyo: Hituzi Shobo.Google Scholar
Mushin, Ilana. 2001. Evidentiality and Epistemological Stance Narrative Retelling [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 97]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakau, Minoru. 1994. Principles of Cognitive Semantics . Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.Google Scholar
. 1979. Modaritii to meidai. Eigo to Nihongo to – Hayashi Eiichi Kyooju Kanreki Kinen Ronbunshuu , Hayashi Eiichi Kyooju Kanreki Kinen Ronbunshuu Kankoo Iinkai (eds), 223-250. Tokyo: Kuroshio Shuppan.Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko. 2002. Imironteki kategorii toshite no modaritii. Cognitive Linguistics II: Categorization , Toshio Ohori (ed.), 217-251. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
. 2005. On defining modality again. Language Sciences 27(2): 165-192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nitta, Yoshio. 1991. Ishi no hyoogen to kikite sonzai. Kokugogaku 165: 1-13.Google Scholar
. 1992. Handan kara hatsuwa dentatsu e – Denbun enkyoku hyoogen o chuushin ni -. Nihongo Kyoiku 77: 1-13.Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan. 2001. Epistemic Modality, Language, and Conceptualization [Human Cognitive Processing 5]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ono, Susumu. 1993. Kakari Musubi no Kenkyuu . Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Onodera, Noriko O. 2004. Japanese Discourse Markers. Synchronic and Diachronic Discourse Markers [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 132]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Onoe, Keisuke. 2001[1990]. Bunpoo-ron – Chinjutsuron no tanjoo to shuuen. Bunpoo to Imi , 278-300. Tokyo: Kurohio Shuppan.Google Scholar
. 2001[1998]. Ichigo-bun no yoohoo: ‘Ima/koko’ o hanarenai bun no kentoo no tame ni. Bunpoo to Imi , 217-229. Tokyo: Kurohio Shuppan.Google Scholar
Prevignano, Carlo L. & Thibault, Paul J. 2003. Discussing Conversation Analysis: The Work of Emanuel A. Schegloff . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prinz, Jessee J. 2006. Is the mind really modular? In Contemporary Debates in Cognitive Science , Robert J. Stainton (ed.), 22-36. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Quinn, Charles J. 1994. UCHI/SOTO: Tip of a semiotic iceberg? ‘Inside’ and ‘outside’ knowledge in the grammar of Japanese. In Situated Meaning: Inside and Outside in Japanese Self, Society, and Language , Jane Bachnik & Charles Quinn Jr. (eds), 247-294. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rijkhoff, Jan. 2002. The Noun Phrase . Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rijkoff, Jan. 2005. Layers, levels and contexts in Functional Discourse Grammar. In The Noun Phrases in Functional Discourse Grammar , Daniel García Velasco & Jan Rijkhoff (eds), 63-115. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne & Lange, Deborah. 1991. The use of like as a marker of reported speech and thought: A case of grammaticalization in progress. American Speech 66: 227-279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saji, Keizo. 1957. Shuujoshi no kinoo. Kokugo Kokubun 26: 23-31.Google Scholar
Sakakura, Atsuyoshi. 1993. Nihongo Hyoogen no Nagare . [Iwanami Seminaa Bukkusu 45]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Selting, Margret & Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2001. Studies in Interactional Linguistics [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 10]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serafim, Leon A. & Shinzato, Rumiko. 2000. Reconstructing the Proto-Japonic kakari musubi, *…ka…-(a)m-wo . Gengo Kenkyu 118: 81-118.Google Scholar
Shinzato, Rumiko. 2003. Experiencing self vs. observing self: The semantics of stative extensions in Japanese. Language Sciences 25: 211-238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Some observations concerning mental and speech act verbs. Journal of Pragmatics 36(5): 883-897. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. (Inter)subjectification, Japanese syntax and scope increase. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8(2): 171-206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shinzato, Rumiko & Serafim, Leon A. 2003. Kakari musubi in comparative perspective: Old Japanese ka/ya and Okinawan -ga/-i. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 11: 189-202.Google Scholar
. 2013. Synchrony and Diachrony of Okinawan Kakari-musubi in Comparative Perspective with Premodern Japanese . Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Strauss, Susan & Sohn, Sung-ock. 1998. Grammaticalization, aspect, and emotion: The case of Japanese -te shimau and Korean -ia/e pelita . Japanese/Korean Linguistics 8: 217-230.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Ryoko. 1998. From a lexical noun to an utterance-final pragmatic particles: Wake . In Studies in Japanese Grammaticalization , Toshio Ohori (ed.), 67-92. Tokyo: Kuroshio Publishers.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Satoko (ed.). 2006. Emotive Communication in Japanese [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 151]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali & Hudson, Rachel. 1999. Be like et al. beyond America: The quotative system in British and Canadian youth. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3(2): 147-172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanabe, Masao. 1953. Iwayuru atsurae no joshi ‘namu’ nit suite. Kindaichi Hakase Koki Kinen Gengo Minzoku Ronsoo . Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
Tokieda, Motoki. 1941. Kokugogaku Genron . Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. From subjectification to intersubjectification. In Motives for Language Change , Raymond Hickey (ed.), 124-139. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard. 1987. On the historical relation between mental and speech act verbs in English and Japanese. In Papers from the Seventh International Conference on Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 48], Anna Giacalone Ramat, Onofrio Carruba & Giuliano Bernini (eds), 561-573. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Tsuchii, Shoichi & Omori, Akira. 2000. Aizuchi o toosei-shita komyunikeeshon ni okeru joshi ne no hindo no henka. Ninchi Kagaku 7(1): 107-111.Google Scholar
Verhagen, Arie. 2005. Constructions of Intersubjectivity . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Watamaki, Toru. 1997. Lack of the particle-ne in conversation by a child with autism: A case study. Hattatsu ShogaiKenkyu 19: 146-157.Google Scholar
Watanabe, Minoru. 1953. Jojutsu to chinjutsu - Jutsugo bunsetsu no koozoo. Kokugogaku 13-14: 20-34.Google Scholar
. 1991. ‘Wagakoto-hitogoto’ no kanten to bunpooron. Kokugogaku   165: 1-14.Google Scholar
. 1995. Tokoro to toki no shitei ni kakawaru go no ikutsuka – Imiron-teki ni. Kokugogaku 181: 18-19.Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, Yoshinori. 1985. Kodai Nihongo Bumpoo no Seiritsu no Kenkyuu . Tokyo: Yuseido.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Rost, Michael
2014. Listening in a Multilingual World: The Challenges of Second Language (L2) Listening. International Journal of Listening 28:3 ► pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Discourse Structuring Markers in English [Constructional Approaches to Language, 33], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.