Abraham, Werner
2009Die Urmasse von Modalität und ihre Ausgliederung Modalität anhand von Modalverben, Modalpartikeln und Modus. In Modalität und Evidentialität. Epistemik und Evidentialität bei Modalverb, Adverb, Modalpartikel und Modus , Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 251-302. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Ariel, Mira
2009 Pragmatics and Grammar . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L
1985 Morphology [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William
1994 The Evolution of Grammar. Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World . Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Choi, Soonja
1995The development of epistemic sentence-ending modal forms and functions in Korean. In Modality in Grammar and Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 32], Joan Bybee & Suzanne Fleischman (eds), 165-204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1976 Aspect . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
de Haan, Ferdinand
2006Typological approaches to modality. In The Expression of Modality , William Frawley (ed.), 27-69. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W
1987The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63: 805-855. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003Discourse and grammar. In The New Psychology of Language , Vol. 2, Michael Tomasello (ed.), 47-87. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nicholas J
(ed.) 2002 Ethnosyntax: Explorations in Culture and Grammar . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nicholas J. & Levinson, Stephen C
(eds) 2006 Roots of Human Sociality . Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia, Fox, Barbara A. & Thompson, Sandra A
2003Social interaction and grammar. In The New Psychology of Language , Vol. 2, Michael Tomasello (ed.), 119-143. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Frawley, William
(ed.) 2006 The Expression of Modality . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A
1986 A Comparative Typology of English and German . London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1997 Cognitive Foundations of Grammar . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J
1998Emergent grammar. In The New Psychology of Language , Michael Tomasello (ed.), 155-175. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Horie, Kaoru
1997Form-meaning interaction in diachrony: A case study from Japanese. English Linguistics 14: 428-449. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998aFunctional duality of case-marking particles in Japanese and its implications for grammaticalization: A contrastive study with Korean. In Japanese/Korean Linguistics 8: 147-159.Google Scholar
1998bOn the polyfunctionality of the Japanese particle No: From the perspectives of ontology and grammaticalization. In Studies in Japanese Grammaticalization: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives , Toshio Ohori (ed.), 169-192. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
2000Complementation in Japanese and Korean: A contrastive and cognitive linguistic approach. In Complementation: Cognitive and Functional Perspectives [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 1], Kaoru Horie (ed.), 11-31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001Kootyakugo ni okeru bunpooka no tokutyoo ni kansuru ninti gengogakuteki koosatu (A cognitive linguistic analysis of the characteristics of grammaticalization in agglutinative languages). In Ninti gengogaku ronkoo (Papers in cognitive linguistics), Masaaki Yamanashi et al. (eds), 89-131. Tokyo: Hituzi.Google Scholar
2002aA comparative typological account of Japanese and Korean morpho-syntactic contrasts. Eonehag 32 (The Linguistic Society of Korea): 9-32.Google Scholar
2002bVerbal nouns in Japanese and Korean: Cognitive typological implications. In Culture, Interaction, Language , Kuniyoshi Kataoka & Sachiko Ide (eds), 77-101. Tokyo: Hituzi.Google Scholar
2003aWhat cognitive linguistics can reveal about complementation in non-IE languages: Case studies from Japanese and Korean. In Cognitive Linguistics and Non-Indo European Languages , Eugene H. Casad & Gary B. Palmer (eds), 363-388. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003bDifferential manifestations of “modality” between Japanese and Korean A typological perspective. In Empirical and Theoretical Investigations into Language , Shuji Chiba et al. (eds), 205-216. Tokyo: Kaitakusya.Google Scholar
2004Danwa to ninti (Discourse and cognition). In Ninti bunpoo ron II (Essays in cognitive linguistics II), Yoshihisa Nakamura (ed.), 247-278. Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
In press. Modaritii no ruikeiron (A typology of modal expressions). In Modaritii: Riron to hoohoo (Modality: Theory and method), Harumi Sawada (ed.) Tokyo Hituzi
Horie, Kaoru & Sassa, Yuko
2000From place to space to discourse: A contrastive linguistic analysis of Tokoro and Tey . In Japanese/ Korean Linguistics 9 , Mineharu Nakayama & Charles J. Quinn (eds), 181-194. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Horie, Kaoru & Taira, Kaori
2002Where Korean and Japanese differ: Modality vs. discourse modality. In Japanese/ Korean Linguistics 10 , Noriko Akatsuka & Susan Strauss (eds), 178-191. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Horie, Kaoru & Pardeshi, Prashant
2009 Gengo no taiporozii: Ninti ruikei ron no apurooti (A typology of languages: Cognitive typological approach). Tokyo: Kenkyusya.Google Scholar
Johnson, Yuki
2003 Modality and the Japanese Language . Ann Arbor MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne
2003Human cognition and the elaboration of events: Some universal conceptual categories. In The New Psychology of Language , Vol. 2. Michael Tomasello (ed.), 89-118. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Kiefer, Ferenc
1999Modality. In Concise Encyclopedia of Grammatical Categories , Keith Brown & Jim Miller (eds), 223-229. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Lee, Hyosang
1991Tense, Aspect, and Modality. A Discourse-Pragmatic Analysis of Verbal Affixes in Korean: From a Typological Perspective. PhD dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
Li, Charles & Thompson, Sandra A
1981 Mandarin Chinese . Berkeley CA: The University of California Press.Google Scholar
Maikino, Seiichi
1983How sensitive is the Japanese language to directly Perceivable phenomena? In Issues in Syntax and Semantics. Festschrift for Masatake Muraki , Kazuko Inoue (ed.), 127-144. Tokyo: Sansyuusya.Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel E
1992 A Reference Grammar of Korean . Tokyo: Tuttle.Google Scholar
Masuoka, Takashi
1991 Modaritii no bunpoo (Grammar of modality). Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
2000Meidai to modaritii no kyookai o motomete (In search for the boundary between proposition and modality). In Nihongo bunpoo no syosoo (Aspects of Japanese grammar), Takashi Masuoka (ed.), 87-98. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Maynard, Senko K
1993 Discourse Modality. Subjectivity, Emotion and Voice in the Japanese Language [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 24]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myhill, John
1992 Typological Discourse Analysis . Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1999 The Languages of Native North America . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Moriya, Testuharu & Horie, Kaoru
2009What is and what is not language-specific about the Japanese modal system? A comparative and historical perspective. In Japanese Modality: Exploring its Scope and Interpretations , Barbara Pizziconi & Mika Kizu (eds), 87-114. Houndmillls: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko
2002aImiron kategorii to site no modaritii (Modality as a semantic category). In Ninti Gengogaku 2: Kategoriika (Cognitive linguistics 2: Categorization), Toshio Ohori (ed.), 217-251. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
2002bPolysemy and indeterminacy in modal markers. The case of Japanese Beshi . Journal of East Asian Linguistics 11: 123-167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005On defining modality again. Language Sciences 27: 165-192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009a Modality in Japanese: The Layered Structure of the Clause and Hierarchies of Functional Categories [Studies in Language Companion Series 109]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009bModality, modariti and predication – The story of modality in Japan. In Japanese Modality. Exploring Its Scope and Interpretation , Barbara Pizziconi & Mika Kizu (eds), 9-35. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
In press. Modaritii no teigi o megutte (Concerning the definition of modality). In Modaritii: Riron to hoohoo (Modality: Theory and method), Harumi Sawada (ed.) Tokyo Hituzi
Narrog, Heiko & Horie, Kaoru
2005Hanasi kotoba ni okeru kanoo hyoogen (Potential expressions in spoken Japanese). In Gengogaku to nihongo kyooiku IV , Masao Minami (ed.), 99-110. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Nitta, Yoshio
1991 Nihongo no modaritii to ninsyoo (Modality and person in Japanese). Tokyo: Hituzi.Google Scholar
2000Ninsiki no modaritii to sono syuuhen (Epistemic modality and its surroundings). In Modaritii (Modality). Nihongo no modaritii to ninsyoo (Modality and person in Japanese), Takuroo Moriyama et al. (eds), 81-159. Tokyo: Iwanami Syoten.Google Scholar
Onoe, Keisuke
1996Bun o doo mita ka: Zyutugoron no gakusiteki tenkai (How did they view a sentence? A historical development of the analysis of predication in Japanese). Nihongogaku (Journal of Japanese Linguistics) 15(8): 4-12.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R
1986 Mood and Modality . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2001 Mood and Modality , 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pizziconi, Barbara
, & Kizu, Mika (eds) 2009 Japanese Modality: Exploring its Scope and Interpretations . Houndmillls: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sawada, Harumi
1995 Studies in English and Japanese Auxiliaries . Tokyo: Hituzi.Google Scholar
Sawada Harumi
(ed.) 2012. Modaritii: Zirei kenkyuu (Modality: Case studies). Tokyo: Hituzi.Google Scholar
Sawada, Harumi
(ed.) In press Modaritii: Riron to Hoohoo (Modality: Theory and method). Tokyo: Hituzi.Google Scholar
Sohn, Homin
1994 Korean . London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Moriya, Tetsuharu & Kaoru Horie
2009. Japanese Modality,  pp. 87 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 december 2018. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.