Cover not available
Part of
Paradigm Change: In the Transeurasian languages and beyond
Edited by Martine Robbeets and Walter Bisang
[Studies in Language Companion Series 161] 2014
► pp. 23–60

Chapter 2. On the strength of morphological paradigms

A historical account of radical pro-drop

| Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz
This paper will present a historical explanation of radical pro-drop based on the strength of morphological paradigms. It will start out from the observation that East and mainland Southeast Asian languages (EMSEA) with their reduced or absent morphology are radical pro-drop, while West African Niger-Congo languages with similarly reduced or absent morphology have obligatory subject and object arguments. The reason for this is that the ancestor languages of Niger-Congo had a morphological paradigm expressing the features of [person] and [number] on the verb, while the ancestor languages of EMSEA had not. It will be argued that the existence of morphological paradigms keeps the frequency of [person] and [number] features above the critical percentage of 20–30% for linguistic change (s-curve model, Wang & Cheng 1970) and thus blocks the change from non-pro-drop to radical pro-drop in the West African languages concerned by passing on the frequency of the former morphological features to syntax and obligatory pronouns. In EMSEA languages, there is no morphological paradigm that pushes the frequency of these features up to the percentage that would be necessary for a change to non-pro-drop.
Published online: 8 October 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.161.07bis
References (66)
References
Ackema, Peter, Brandt, Patrick, Schoorlemmer, Maaike & Weerman, Fred. 2006. Arguments and Agreement. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Adelaar, Alexander. 2005. The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar: A historical perspective. In The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar, Alexander Adelaar & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann (eds), 1–42. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Anderson, Gregory. 2006. The Munda verb. Typological Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ansaldo, Umberto & Lim, Lisa. 2004. Phonetic absence as syntactic prominence. Grammaticalization in isolating tonal languages. In Up and Down the Cline — The Nature of Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Languag 59], Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (eds), 345–362. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arcodia, Giorgio Francesco. 2013. Grammaticalization with coevolution of form and meaning in East Asia? Evidence from Sinitic. Language Sciences 40: 148–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baerman, Matthew & Corbett, Greville G. 2010. Introduction: Defectiveness: Typology and diachrony. In Defective Paradigms. Missing Forms and What They Tell Us, Matthew Baerman, Greville G. Corbett & Dunstan Brown (eds), 1–18. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Charles-James N. 1973. Variation and Linguistic Theory. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bamgboṣe, Ayọ̀. 1967. A Short Yoruba Grammar. Ibadan: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Geoffrey. 1976. An outline of Temiar grammar. In Austroasiatic Studies I and II, Philip N. Jenner, Laurence C. Thompson & Stanley Starosta (eds), 129–188. Honolulu HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter. 1992. Das Verb im Chinesischen, Hmong, Vietnamesischen, Thai und Khmer. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
. 2004. Grammaticalization without coevolution of form and meaning: The case of tense-aspect-modality in East and mainland Southeast Asia. In What Makes Grammaticalization? - A Look from its Fringes and its Components, Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds), 109–138. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. South East Asia as a linguistic area. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Vol. 11, Keith Brown (ed.), 587–595. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
. 2008. Grammaticalization and the areal factor: The perspective of East and mainland Southeast Asian languages. In Rethinking Grammaticalization. New Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 76], López-Couso, María José & Elena Seoane (eds), 15–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. On the evolution of complexity — Sometimes less is more in East and mainland Southeast Asia. In Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable, Geoffrey Sampson, David Gil & Peter Trudgill (eds), 34–49. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2011. Grammaticalization and typology. In Handbook of Grammaticalization, Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds), 105–117. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2013. Language contact between geographic and mental space. In Linguistic Perspectives on Space: Geography, Interaction, and Cognition, Peter Auer, Martin Hilpert, Anja Stukenbrock & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi (eds), 61–100. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. Forthcoming. Khmer. In Handbook of Austroasiatic, Paul Sidwell & Mathias Jenny (eds). London: Routledge.
Bisang, Walter & Sonaiya, Remi. 1999. The function of the High Tone Syllable in Yoruba. The Journal of African Languages and Linguistics (JALL) 20: 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. 1985. Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chambers, Jack K. & Trudgill, Peter. 1998. Dialectology, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Déchaine, Rose-Marie. 1993. Predicates across Categories: Towards A Category-neutral Syntax. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Dede, Keith. 2007. The origin of the anti-ergative [xa] in Huangshui Chinese. Language and Lingusitics 8(4): 863–881.Google Scholar
Devos, Maud. 2008. A Grammar of Makwe. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Djamouri, Redouane. 2013. Object incorporation in Tangwang. Paper presented at the ‘1st International Symposium on Linguistic Typology’, Changshu, November 30 – December 01, 2013.Google Scholar
Donegan, Patricia & Stampe, David. 2004. Rhythm and the synthetic drift of Munda. In The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 2004, Rajendra Singh (ed.), 3–36. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Edmondson, Jerold & Solnit, David. 1988. Introduction. In Comparative Kadai: Linguistic Studies beyondTai, Jerold Edmondson & David Solnit (eds), 1–26. Dallas TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nick J. 2003. Linguistic Epidemiology. Semantics and Grammar of Language Contact in Mainland Southeast Asia. London: Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar
. 2005. Areal linguistics and Mainland Southeast Asia. Annual Review of Anthropology 34: 181–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph. 1974. Numeral classifiers and substantival number: Problems in the genesis of a linguistic type. In Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Linguistics, Bologna - Florence, Aug-Sept 1972, Bologna 1974, 17–37. Reprinted in: Greenberg (1990: 16–93).Google Scholar
Güldemann, Tom. 2007. Bantu in its macro-areal context of Africa and implications for the early typology of Bantu and Niger-Congo. Paper read at the International Conference on Bantu Languages, Gothenburg, Oct. 4–6.Google Scholar
. 2010. Proto-Bantu and Proto-Niger-Congo: Macro-areal typology and linguistic reconstruction. In Geographical Typology and Linguistic Areas. With Special Reference to Africa [Tokyo University of Foreign Studies 2], Osamu Hieda, Christa König & Hirosi Nakagawa (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Haiman, John. 1983. Iconic and economic motivation. Language 59: 781–819. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 531–574.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry Michael. 1999. The historical interpretation of vowel harmony. In Bantu Historical Linguistics: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives, Jean-Marie Hombert & Larry Michael Hyman (eds), 235–295. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
. 2004. How to become a Kwa verb. Journal of West African Languages 30: 69–88.Google Scholar
. 2010. The Macro-Sudan Belt and Niger-Congo Reconstruction. [URL] (4 September 2011).Google Scholar
Jacob, Judith M. 1968. Introduction to Cambodian. London: OUP.Google Scholar
Jaeggli, Osvaldo & Safir, Ken. 1989. The null subject parameter in language acquisition. In The Null Subject Parameter, Osvaldo Jaeggli & Ken Safir (eds), 215–238. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jenner, Philipp & Pou, Saveros. 1982. A Lexicon of Khmer Morphology. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1973. ‘Elsewhere’ in Phonology. In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds), 93–106. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Kruspe, Nicole. 2004. A Grammar of Semelai. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Claire & Brousseau, Anne-Marie. 2002. A Grammar of Fongbe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1995. Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Li, Fang-Kuei. 1977. A Handbook of Comparative Tai. Honolulu HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Li, Xuping & Bisang, Walter. 2012. Classifiers in Sinitic languages: From individuation to definiteness-marking. Lingua 122: 335–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luo, Yongxian. 1997. The Subgroup Structure of the Tai Languages: A Historical-Comparative Study [Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 12]. Berkeley CA: University of California.Google Scholar
Mottin, Jean. 1980. Contes et légendes Hmong Blanc. Bangkok: Don Bosco Press.Google Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & Szendrői, Kriszta. 2007. Radical pro drop and the morphology of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 671–714. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nurse, Derek. 2007. Did Proto-Bantu have a syntactic or an analytic structure? School of Oriental and African Studies Working Papers in Linguistics15: 239–256.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David. 1971. Deep and Surface Constraints in Generative Grammar. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Pinnow, Heinz-Jürgen. 1960. Über den Ursprung der voneinander abweichenden Strukturen der Munda- und Khmer-Nikobar Sprachen. Indo-Iranian Journal 4(1): 81–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ratliff, Martha. 2010. Hmong-Mien Language History. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501–557.Google Scholar
Robbeets, Martine. 2012. Shared verb morphology in the Transeurasian languages: copy or cognate? In Copies versus Cognates in Bound Morphology, Lars Johanson & Martine Robbeets (eds), 427–446. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, Malcolm. 2002. The history and transitivity of western Austronesian voice and voice-marking. In The History and Typology of Western Austronesian Voice Systems, Fay Wouk & Malcolm Ross (eds), 17–62. Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Sagart, Laurent 1999. The Roots of Old Chinese [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 184]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seifart, Frank. 2011. Bora Loans in Resígaro: massive morphological and little lexical borrowing in a Moribund Arawakan language. Cadernos de Etnolingüística. Série Monografias 2.Google Scholar
Sidwell, Paul. 2008. Issues in the morphological reconstruction of Proto-Mon-Khmer. In Morphology and Language History. In Honour of Harold Koch [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 298], Claire Bowern, Bethwyn Evans & Luisa Miceli (eds), 251–265. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Classifying the Austroasiatic Languages: History and State of the Art. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Speas, Margaret. 1994. Null arguments in a theory of economy of projections. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 17: 179–208.Google Scholar
Van de Velde, Mark L.O. 2009. Eton tonology and morphosyntax: A holistic typological approach. In New Challenges in Typology: Broadening the Horizons and Redefining the Foundations, Vol. 2, Pacience L. Epps & Alexandre Arkhipov (eds), 35–60. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Van Driem, George. 2001. Languages of the Himalayas, Vol. 1. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Wang, Jian / 王健. 2013. 类型学视野下的汉语方言“量名”结构研究 (Bare classifier phrases in Sinitic languages: a typological perspective). Language Sciences 12(4): 383–393.Google Scholar
Wang, William S.-Y. & Cheng, Chin-Chuan. 1970. Implementation of phonological change: The Shuang-feng Chinese case. Chicago Linguistics Society 6: 552–559.Google Scholar
Zide, Norman H. & Anderson, Gregory D.S. 2001. The Proto-Munda verb system and some connections with Mon-Khmer. In Yearbook of South Asian Linguistics, Peri Bhaskararao & Karumi Venkata Subbarao (eds), 517–540. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by (27)

Cited by 27 other publications

Li, Fanxi
2021. On the conditional marker “zhě”(者). International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 8:2 ► pp. 204 ff. DOI logo
Seržant, Ilja A.
2021. Cyclic changes in verbal person-number indexes are unlikely. Folia Linguistica 55:s42-s1 ► pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2018. Areal diffusion and the limits of grammaticalization. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 337 ff. DOI logo
Ansaldo, Umberto, Walter Bisang & Pui Yiu Szeto
2018. Grammaticalization in isolating languages and the notion of complexity. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
Arkadiev, Peter & Timur Maisak
2018. Grammaticalization in the North Caucasian languages. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 116 ff. DOI logo
Bisang, Walter
2018. Knowledge Representation and Cognitive Skills in Problem Solving. In Positive Learning in the Age of Information, ► pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Coupe, Alexander R.
2018. Grammaticalization processes in the languages of South Asia. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 189 ff. DOI logo
Dahl, Östen
2018. Grammaticalization in the languages of Europe. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Esseesy, Mohssen
2018. Typological features of grammaticalization in Semitic. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Haig, Geoffrey
2018. Grammaticalization and inflectionalization in Iranian. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Haspelmath, Martin
2018. Revisiting the anasynthetic spiral. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 97 ff. DOI logo
Heine, Bernd
2018. Grammaticalization in Africa. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 16 ff. DOI logo
Johanson, Lars & Éva Á. Csató
2018. Grammaticalization in Turkic. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 146 ff. DOI logo
Klamer, Marian
2018. Typology and grammaticalization in the Papuan languages of Timor, Alor, and Pantar. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
McWhorter, John H.
2018. Is grammaticalization in creoles different?. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 394 ff. DOI logo
Mithun, Marianne
2018. Shaping typology through grammaticalization: North America. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 309 ff. DOI logo
Moyse-Faurie, Claire
2018. Grammaticalization in Oceanic languages. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 282 ff. DOI logo
Mushin, Ilana
2018. Grammaticalization and typology in Australian Aboriginal languages. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 263 ff. DOI logo
Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine
2018. Introduction. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine
2018. Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, DOI logo
Narrog, Heiko, Seongha Rhee & John Whitman
2018. Grammaticalization in Japanese and Korean. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 166 ff. DOI logo
Smith, Hiram L.
2018. Addressing questions of grammaticalization in creoles. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 372 ff. DOI logo
Zariquiey, Roberto
2018. Diachronic stories of body-part nouns in some language families of South America. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 350 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. Preface. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. viii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. Copyright Page. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. iv ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. List of abbreviations. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. ix ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. Series preface. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. vii ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.