Cover not available
Part of
Paradigm Change: In the Transeurasian languages and beyond
Edited by Martine Robbeets and Walter Bisang
[Studies in Language Companion Series 161] 2014
► pp. 141–176

Chapter 7. Comparative consequences of the tongue root harmony analysis for proto-Tungusic, proto-Mongolic, and proto-Korean

 | Queens College of the City University of New York
 | Cornell University
 | Cornell University | National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics
This paper examines the role of retracted tongue root ([RTR]) harmony in Northeast Asian areal and genetic relationships. Recent research has suggested that at least three of the families grouped together as Altaic by Poppe (1960) – Korean, Mongolic, and Tungusic (KMT) – should be reconstructed with [RTR] vowel harmony. In this paper we reinforce this conclusion, arguing specifically against proposals that [RTR] harmony is secondary, or that [ATR] is the dominant feature. We also argue against the proposal of Starostin et al. (2003) that specific proto-families such as proto-Tungusic should be reconstructed without vowel harmony. We then compare the status of [RTR] harmony in Northeast Asia to the status of tongue root harmony in the Central Sudanic Zone, extending our discussion to the vowel harmony found in Chukchi, Yukaghir, Nivkh, and Ainu. We discuss whether KMT-style [RTR] harmony should be viewed as an innovation or a retention, and examine the particular issue of the Korean vowel inventory.
Published online: 8 October 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.161.13ko
References (97)
References
Ahn, Sang-Cheol. 2002. A dispersion account on Middle Korean vowel shifts. In Japanese/Korean Linguistics 10, Noriko M. Akatsuka & Susan Strauss (eds), 237–250. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Aralova, Natalia, Grawunder, Sven & Winter, Bodo. 2011. The acoustic correlates of tongue root vowel harmony in Even (Tungusic). Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVII): 240–243.
Archangeli, Diana B. & Pulleyblank, Douglas G. 1994. Grounded Phonology. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ard, Josh. 1981. A sketch of vowel harmony in the Tungusic languages. In Studies in the Languages of the USSR, B. Comrie (ed.), 23–43. Edmonton, Alberta: Linguistic Research.Google Scholar
. 1984. Vowel harmony in Manchu: A critical overview. Journal of Linguistics 20(1): 57–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baxter, William H. & Sagart, Laurent. 2011. Baxter-Sagart Old Chinese Reconstruction. [URL] (20 February 2011)Google Scholar
Benzing, Johannes. 1955. Die tungusischen Sprachen: Versuch einer vergleichenden Grammatik. Wiesbaden: Verlag der Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur in Mainz.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan. 2009. Disharmony and Decay: Itelmen Vowel Harmony in the Soviet Period. Ms, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Buraev, Ignatij Dmitrievich. 1959. Zvukovoj sostav burjatskogo jazyka(The Sound Structure of Buriat). Ulan-Ude.Google Scholar
Casali, Roderic F. 2003. [ATR] value asymmetries and underlying vowel inventory structure in Niger-Congo and Nilo-Saharan. Linguistic Typology 7(3): 307–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Castrén, A. 1856. Grundzüge einer tungusischen Sprachlehre nebst kurzem Wörterverzeichniss. Saint Petersburg.Google Scholar
Catford, John C. 1994. Vowel systems of Caucasian languages. In Non-Slavic Languages of the USSR: Papers from the Fourth Conference, Howard Isaac Aronson (ed.), 44–60. Columbus OH: Slavica.Google Scholar
Čenggeltei. 1959. Mongɣol kelen-ü baɣarin ayalɣun-u abiy-a-yin jüi ba üges-ün jüi [Phonology and morphology of the Baarin dialect of Mongolian]. Öbör Monggol-un Yeke Surgaguli-yin Erdem Sinjilegen-ü Sedgül: Gün Uqagan Neyigem Sinjilekü Uqagan (Journal of Inner Mongolia University: Philosophy and Social Sciences) 1959(2): 1–96.Google Scholar
. 1963. Mongɣol kelen-ü abiyan-u sistem (The Mongolian sound system). Öbör Monggol-un Yeke Surgaguli-yin Erdem Sinjilegen-ü Sedgül: Gün Uqagan Neyigem Sinjilekü Uqagan (Journal of Inner Mongolia University: Philosophy and Social Sciences) 1963(2): 1–84.Google Scholar
Čenggeltei & Sinedke. 1959. Mongɣol kelen-ü ündüsün egesig-üd-ün tuqai (The basic vowels of Mongolian). Öbör Monggol-un Yeke Surgaguli-yin Erdem Sinjilegen-ü Sedgül: Gün Uqagan Neyigem Sinjilekü Uqagan (Journal of Inner Mongolia University: Philosophy and Social Sciences) 1959(2): 97–114.Google Scholar
Cho, Mi-Hui. 1994. Vowel Harmony in Korean: A Grounded Phonology Approach. PhD dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Clements, G.N. & Rialland, Annie. 2008. Africa as a phonological area. In A Linguistic Geography of Africa, B. Heine & D. Nurse (eds), 36–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dimmendaal, Gerrit J. 2001. Areal diffusion versus genetic inheritance: an African perspective. In Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance: Problems in Comparative Linguistics, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M.W. Dixon (eds), 359–392. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dresher, B. Elan. 2009. The Contrastive Hierarchy in Phonology. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dresher, B. Elan, Harvey, Christopher & Oxford, Will. 2012. Contrast shift as a type of diachronic change. Handout presented at the 43rd annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 43), CUNY.
Dresher, B. Elan & Zhang, Xi. 2005. Contrast and phonological activity in Manchu vowel systems. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique 50: 45–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Georg, Stefan. 2004. Unreclassifying Tungusic. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Manchu-Tungus Studies (Bonn, August 28-September 1, 2000), Vol 2: Trends in Tungusic and Siberian Linguistics [Tunguso Sibirica 9], Carsten Naeher, Giovanni Stary & Michael Weiers (eds), 45–57. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Goad, Heather. 1992. [Atr] and [Rtr] are different features. In Proceedings of the Tenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Dawn Bates (ed.), 163–173. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Hall, Beatrice L. & Hall, Richard M.R. 1980. Nez Perce vowel harmony: An Africanist explanation and some theoretical questions. In Issues in Vowel Harmony (Proceedings of the CUNY Linguistics Conference on Vowel Harmony, 14th May 1977), [Studies in Language Companion Series 6], Robert M. Vago (ed), 201-236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hattori, Shirō. 1975. Boin chōwa to chūki chōsengo no boin taikei (Vowel harmony and the Middle Korean vowel system). Gengo no Kagaku 6: 1–22.Google Scholar
. 1982. Vowel harmonies of the Altaic languages, Korean, and Japanese. Acta Orientalia Hungarica 36: 207–214.Google Scholar
Hayata, Teruhiro. 1980. Non-abstract vowel harmony in Manchu. Gengo Kenkyū 77: 59–79.Google Scholar
Hu, Zengyi. 2001. Elunchun yu yanjiu(Research on the Oroqen Language). Beijing, China: Minzu chubanshe.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry. 2011. The Macro-Sudan belt and Niger-Congo reconstruction. Language Dynamics & Change 1(1): 3–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ikegami, Jirō. 1997. Uirutago jiten (A Dictionary of the Uilta Language spoken on Sakhalin). Sapporo: Hokkaidō Daigaku Tosho Kankōkai.Google Scholar
Itō, Chiyuki. 2007. Chōsen kanzion kenkyū(Sino-Korean Phonology). Tokyo: Kyuko-shoin.Google Scholar
Janhunen, Juha. 1981. Korean vowel system in North Asian perspective. Hangeul 172: 129–146.Google Scholar
. 2003. Proto-Mongolic. In The Mongolic Languages, Juha Janhunen (ed.), 1–29. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Joseph, Andrew & Whitman, John. 2013. The diachronic consequences of the RTR analysis of Tungusic vowel harmony. In MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 67: Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics (WAFL 8), Umut Özge (ed.), 159–174. Cambridge MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Kang, Hijo & Ko, Seongyeon. 2011. In search of the acoustic correlates of tongue root retraction in three Altaic languages: Western Buriat, Tsongol Buriat, and Ewen. Altai Hakpo 22: 179–203.Google Scholar
Kaun, Abigail. 1995. The Typology of Rounding Harmony: An Optimality Theoretic Approach. PhD dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
. 2004. The typology of rounding harmony. In Phonetically Based Phonology, Bruce Hayes, Robert M. Kirchner & Donca Steriade (eds), 87–116. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kazama, Shinjirō. 2003. Basic Vocabulary (A) of Tungusic Languages (Endangered Languages of the Pacific Rim Publications Series A2–037) Publications on Tungus Languages and Cultures 25]. Ōsaka: Ōsaka Gakuin University.Google Scholar
Kim, Chin-Wu. 1978. “Diagonal” vowel harmony? Some implications for historical phonology. In Recent Developments in Historical Phonology 4, Jacek Fisiak (ed.), 221–236. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kim, Jong-Kyoo. 2000. Quantity-sensitivity and Feature-sensitivity of Vowels: A Constraint-based Approach to Korean Vowel Phonology. PhD dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Kim, Juwon. 1988. Moumcohwawa selchwuk: Hwunminjengum haylyeyuy selchwukey tayhaye (Vowel harmony and “selchwuk”: On the tongue retraction in Hunminjeongeum). Eoneohag (Journal of the Linguistic Society of Korea) 9(10): 29-43.Google Scholar
. 1989. Mancwu thwungkwusuceyeuy moumcohwa yenkwu (A Study on Vowel Harmony in the Manchu-Tungus Languages). PhD dissertation, Seoul National University.Google Scholar
. 1993. Moumcohwauy yenku (A Study on Vowel Harmony in Korean). Kyeungsan: Yeungnam University Press.Google Scholar
. 1999. Selkunhwuchwukkwa selkuncencin (RTR and ATR). In Eneuy yeksa(History of Languages: In Honor of Professor Baeg-in Seong), 311–341. Seoul: Thaehaksa.Google Scholar
. 2011. A Grammar of Ewen [Altaic Languages Series 6]. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.Google Scholar
Kim-Renaud, Y.-K. 2008. The vowel system and vowel harmony in 15th century Korean revisited. In Proceedings of the SCRIPTA 2008: Hunminjeongeum and Alphabetic Writing Systems, 23–36.Google Scholar
Ko, Seongyeon. 2010. A contrastivist view on the evolution of the Korean vowel system. In MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 61: Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics (WAFL 6), Hiroki Maezawa & Azusa Yokogoshi (eds), 181–196. Cambridge MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
. 2011. Vowel contrast and vowel harmony shift in the Mongolic languages. Language Research 47(1): 23–43.Google Scholar
. 2012. Tongue Root Harmony and Vowel Contrast in Northeast Asian Languages. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
. 2013a. The end of the Korean vowel shift controversy. Korean Linguistics 15(2): 195–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013b. Vowel feature hierarchies in Tungusic. In Current Trends in Altaic Linguistics: A Festschrift for Professor Emeritus Seong Baeg-in on his 80th Birthday, Juwon Kim & Dongho Ko (eds), 91-124. Seoul: Altaic Society of Korea.Google Scholar
. 2013c. Towards a contrast-driven typology of the Altaic vowel systems. Paper presented at the 9th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics (WAFL 9). Cornell University, Ithaca NY.
Kwak, Chung-gu. 2003. Hyentay kwukeuy moumcheykyewa ku pyenhwauy panghyang (The vowel system of Contemporary Korean and direction of change). Kwukehak 41: 59–91.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Maddieson, Ian. 1996. The Sounds of the World’s Languages. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lee, Byung-Gun. 1985. Moum cohwauy thukseng (Some tangible properties of vowel harmony). Inmwunnonchong 15: 3–36.Google Scholar
Lee, Duck-Young. 1994. Korean vowel harmony: ATR-harmony. Hangeul 223: 157–199.Google Scholar
Lee, Jin-Seong. 1992. Phonology and Sound Symbolism of Korean Ideophones. PhD dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Lee, Ki-Moon. 1958. A comparative study of Manchu and Korean. Ural-altaische Jahrbücher 30: 104–120.Google Scholar
. 1964. Mongolian loan-words in Middle Korean. Ural-altaische Jahrbücher 35: 188–197.Google Scholar
. 1972. Kwukesa kaysel (Outline of the History of the Korean Language), 2nd edn. Seoul: Tower Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Ki-Moon & Ramsey, S. Robert. 2011. A History of the Korean Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Yongsung. 1993. Topics in the Vowel Phonology of Korean. PhD dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Li, Bing. 1996. Tungusic Vowel Harmony: Description and Analysis [HIL Dissertations 18]. Leiden: Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics.Google Scholar
Lindau, Mona. 1979. The feature expanded. Journal of Phonetics 7: 163–176.Google Scholar
Lulich, Steven & Whaley, Lindsay. 2012. An acoustic phonetic study of Oroqen vowels. In Recent advances in Tungusic Languages [Turcologica 89], Andrej Malchukov & Lindsay Whaley (eds), 59–78. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel E. 1996. Consonant Lenition in Korean. Honolulu HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
. 2000. How have Korean vowels changed through time? Korean Linguistics 10: 1–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maslova, Elena. 2003. A Grammar of Kolyma Yukaghir. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Möömöö, Sürèngijn. 1977. Sistema fonem sovremennogo mongol’skogo jazyka (The Phoneme System of Modern Mongolian). Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew. 2010. Locality in Vowel Harmony [Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 55]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina. 2006. A Historical Dictionary of Yukaghir. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina Alekseevna & Tolskaya, Maria. 2001. A Grammar of Udihe [Mouton Grammar Library 22]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Novikova, K.A. 1960. Ocherki dialektov Evenskogo jazyka: Ol’skij govor, Vol. 1. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Park, Jong-Hee. 1983. Kwuke umwunlon yenkwu (A Study on Korean Phonology). Iksan: Wonkwang University Press.Google Scholar
. 1994. Cwunglipmoum /i/-uy poncilkwa moumcohwa (The nature of the neutral vowel /i/ and vowel harmony). In Wulimal yenkwuuy saymthe, 134–153. Daejeon: Mwunkyeng Press.Google Scholar
. 2002. Cwungsengmoum /i/-uy thwumyengsengkwa pwulthwumyengseng (The transparency and opacity of the neutral vowel /i/ in Middle Korean). Hangeul 257: 71–101.Google Scholar
Park, Jong-Hee & Kwon, Pyong-Ro. 2009. Moumcheykyeyuy pyenchenkwa cacilkyelhap coken (The change of vowel system and featural combination conditions in Middle Korean). Kwukemwunhak 47: 37–61.Google Scholar
Poppe, Nicholas N. 1955. Introduction to Mongolian Comparative Studies. Helsinki: Suomalais-ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
. 1960. Vergleichende Grammatik der altaischen Sprachen, Teil I: Vergleichende Lautlehre (Comparative grammar of the Altaic languages, Part 1: comparative phonology). Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Przezdziecki, Marek. 2005. Vowel Harmony and Coarticulation in Three Dialects of Yoruba: Phonetics Determining Phonology. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren. 2007. Markedness in phonology. In The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology, Paul de Lacy (ed.), 79–98. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Robbeets, Martine. I. 2005. Is Japanese Related to Korean, Tungusic, Mongolic and Turkic? [Turcologica 64]. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1990. The Languages of Japan. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Shiraishi, Hidetoshi & Botma, Bert. 2013. Asymmetries and attractors in Nivkh vowel sequences. Ms, Sapporo Gakuin University and Leiden University.Google Scholar
Starostin, Sergei A., Dybo, Anna V. & Mudrak, Oleg A. 2003. Etymological Dictionary of the Altaic Languages [Handbuch der Orientalistik VIII.8.1–3]. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 1995. Underspecification and markedness. In The Handbook of Phonological Theory, John A. Goldsmith (ed), 114–174. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sunik, O.P. 1968. Udėgejskij jazyk (Udihe language). In Jazyki narodov SSSR (Languages of the Peoples of the USSR) 5: 210–232. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Svantesson, Jan-Olof. 1985. Vowel harmony shift in Mongolian. Lingua 67: 283–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svantesson, Jan-Olof, Tsendina, Anna, Karlsson, Anastasia M. & Franzén, Vivan. 2005. The Phonology of Mongolian. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Titov, Je. I. 1926. Tungussko-russkij slovar’s priloženijem knigi M. A. Kastrena “Osnovy izučenija tungusskogo jazyka”. Irkutsk.Google Scholar
Tsintsius, Vera. 1949. Sravnitel’naja fonetika tunguso-man’chzhurskikh jazykov (Comparative Phonetics of the Manchu-Tungus Languages). Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
. 1975–1977. Sravnitel’nyj slovar’ tunguso-man’chzhurskikh jazykov (Comparative Dictionary of the Manchu-Tungus Languages). Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
van der Hulst, Harry & van de Weijer, Jeroen. 1995. Vowel harmony. In The Handbook of Phonological Theory, John A. Goldsmith (ed), 495–534. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vaux, Bert. 2009. [atr] and [back] harmony in the Altaic languages. In Investigations into Formal Altaic Linguistics: Proceedings of WAFL3, Sergei Tatevosov (ed), 50–67. Moscow: MAKS Press.Google Scholar
Vovin, Alexander. 2000. On the Great Vowel Shift in Middle Korean and position of stress in Proto-Korean. Korean Linguistics 10: 61–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Xi. 1996. Vowel Systems of the Manchu-Tungus Languages of China. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Zhang, Xi & Dresher, B. Elan. 2004. Tongue root harmony in Written Manchu. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Manchu-Tungus Studies (Bonn, August 28-September 1, 2000), Vol 2: Trends in Tungusic and Siberian Linguistics, Carsten Naeher, Giovanni Stary & Michael Weiers (eds), 161–190. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Cited by (30)

Cited by 30 other publications

Harry van der Hulst & Nancy A. Ritter
2024. The Oxford Handbook of Vowel Harmony, DOI logo
Janhunen, Juha A.
2023. The Unity and Diversity of Altaic. Annual Review of Linguistics 9:1 ► pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Kenstowicz, Michael J.
2023. Phonetic correlates to Khalkha Mongolian vowel contrasts: duration, formants and voice quality. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 32:4 ► pp. 523 ff. DOI logo
Nikolsky, Aleksey
2020. “Talking Jew’s Harp” and Its Relation to Vowel Harmony as a Paradigm of Formative Influence of Music on Language. In The Origins of Language Revisited, ► pp. 217 ff. DOI logo
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2018. Areal diffusion and the limits of grammaticalization. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 337 ff. DOI logo
Ansaldo, Umberto, Walter Bisang & Pui Yiu Szeto
2018. Grammaticalization in isolating languages and the notion of complexity. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
Arkadiev, Peter & Timur Maisak
2018. Grammaticalization in the North Caucasian languages. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 116 ff. DOI logo
Coupe, Alexander R.
2018. Grammaticalization processes in the languages of South Asia. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 189 ff. DOI logo
Dahl, Östen
2018. Grammaticalization in the languages of Europe. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Esseesy, Mohssen
2018. Typological features of grammaticalization in Semitic. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Haig, Geoffrey
2018. Grammaticalization and inflectionalization in Iranian. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Haspelmath, Martin
2018. Revisiting the anasynthetic spiral. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 97 ff. DOI logo
Heine, Bernd
2018. Grammaticalization in Africa. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 16 ff. DOI logo
Johanson, Lars & Éva Á. Csató
2018. Grammaticalization in Turkic. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 146 ff. DOI logo
Klamer, Marian
2018. Typology and grammaticalization in the Papuan languages of Timor, Alor, and Pantar. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
McWhorter, John H.
2018. Is grammaticalization in creoles different?. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 394 ff. DOI logo
Mithun, Marianne
2018. Shaping typology through grammaticalization: North America. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 309 ff. DOI logo
Moyse-Faurie, Claire
2018. Grammaticalization in Oceanic languages. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 282 ff. DOI logo
Mushin, Ilana
2018. Grammaticalization and typology in Australian Aboriginal languages. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 263 ff. DOI logo
Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine
2018. Introduction. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine
2018. Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, DOI logo
Narrog, Heiko, Seongha Rhee & John Whitman
2018. Grammaticalization in Japanese and Korean. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 166 ff. DOI logo
Smith, Hiram L.
2018. Addressing questions of grammaticalization in creoles. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 372 ff. DOI logo
Zariquiey, Roberto
2018. Diachronic stories of body-part nouns in some language families of South America. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 350 ff. DOI logo
Shiraishi, Hidetoshi & Bert Botma
2017. On the diachronic origin of Nivkh height restrictions. In Sonic Signatures [Language Faculty and Beyond, 14], ► pp. 202 ff. DOI logo
Bugaeva, Anna
2015. Causative constructions in Ainu: A typological perspective with remarks on the diachrony. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 68:4 ► pp. 439 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. Copyright Page. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. iv ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. List of abbreviations. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. ix ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. Series preface. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. vii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. Preface. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. viii ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.