Part of
Grammaticalization – Theory and Data
Edited by Sylvie Hancil and Ekkehard König
[Studies in Language Companion Series 162] 2014
► pp. 87106
References (61)
References
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2008. Productivity: Evidence from Case and Argument Structure in Icelandic [Constructional Approaches to Grammar 8]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Construction-based historical-comparative reconstruction. In Hoffmann & Trousdale(eds), 438-457.
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Gildea, Spike, Smirnova, Elena & Sommerer, Lotte (eds). Forthcoming. Historical Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Boas, Hans C. 2013. Cognitive construction grammar. In Hoffmann & Trousdale (eds), 233-252.
Bergs, Alexander & Diewald, Gabriele (eds). 2008. Constructions and Language Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction Morphology. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2005. Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan & McClelland, James L. 2005. Alternatives to the combinatorial paradigm of linguistic theory based on domain general principles of human cognition. The Linguistic Review 22: 381-410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Typology. In The Handbook of Linguistics, Mark Aronoff & Janie Rees-Miller (eds), 337–368. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, Christiane. 1996. The French Influence on Middle English Morphology: A Corpus-based Study of Derivation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Defour, Tine, D’Hondt, Ulrique, Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie & Willems, Dominique. Forthcoming. In fact, en fait, de fait, au fait: A contrastive study of the synchronic correspondences and diachronic development of English and French cognates. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen.
De Smet, Hendrik. 2012. The course of actualization. Language 88: 601-633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2002. A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 103-120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 2007. Morphosyntactic Change: Functional and Formal Perspectives. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2011. Grammaticalization as analogically driven change? In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds), 31-42. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Francis, Elaine J. & Michaelis, Laura A. (eds). 2003. Mismatch: A crucible for linguistic theory. In Mismatch: Form-Function Incongruity and the Architecture of Grammar, Elaine J. Francis & Laura A. Michaelis (eds), 1-27. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Fried, Mirjam. 2009. Representing contextual factors in language change: Between frames and constructions. In Contexts and Constructions[Constructional Approaches to Language 9], Alexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 63-94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Andrew. 2012. The historical syntax problem: Reanalysis and directionality. In Grammatical Change: Origins, Nature, Outcomes, Dianna Jonas, John Whitman & Andrew Garrett (eds), 52-72. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, Anna, Mauri, Caterina & Molinelli, Piera (eds). 2010. Synchrony and Diachrony: A Dynamic Interface [Studies in Language Companion Series 103]. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1979. On Understanding Grammar. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2013. Constructionist approaches. In Hoffmann & Trousdale (eds), 15-31.
Haselow, Alexander. 2011. Typological Changes in the Lexicon: Analytic Tendencies in English Noun Formation. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2004. On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization. In Up and Down the Cline – The Nature of Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 59], Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (eds), 17-44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2004. Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In What Makes Grammaticalization - A Look from its Fringes and its Components, Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds), 21-42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland & Petrova, Svetlana (eds). 2009. Information Structure and Language Change: New Approaches to Word Order Variation in Germanic. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich & Joseph, Brian D. 2009. Language History, Language Change, and Language Relationship, 2nd rev. edn. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Sebastian. 2005. Grammaticalization and English Complex Prepositions: A Corpus-based Study. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas & Trousdale, Graeme (eds). 2013. The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Israel, Michael. 1996. The way constructions grow. In Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language, Adele Goldberg (ed.), 217-230. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1995. Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom. (2nd, rev. edn of Thoughts on Grammaticalization: A Programmatic Sketch, 1982).Google Scholar
. 2004. Theory and method in grammaticalization. In Grammatikalisierung, Gabriele Diewald (ed.), Special issue of Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 32: 152-187. [URL] (under Schriftenverzeichnis, year 2004).Google Scholar
. 2008. Information structure and grammaticalization. In Theoretical and Empirical Issues in Grammaticalization[Typological Studies in Language 77], Elena Seoane & María José López-Couso (eds), in collaboration with Teresa Fanego, 207-229. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, Douglas. 2011. Grammaticalization and lexicalization. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds), 438-449. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lipka, Leonhard. 2002. English Lexicology: Lexical Structure, Word Semantics & Word-formation. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. (3rd revised edn. of An Outline of English Lexicology, 1990).Google Scholar
Mair, Christian. 2004. Corpus linguistics and grammaticalisation theory: Statistics, frequencies, and beyond. In Corpus Approaches to Grammaticalization in English[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 13], Hans Lindquist & Christian Mair (eds), 121-150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1958[1912]. L’évolution des formes grammaticales. In Linguistique historique et linguistique générale, Antoine Meillet, 130-148. Paris: Champion. (Originally published in Scientia (Rivista di scienza) XXII: 1912.)Google Scholar
Nordlinger, Rachel & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1999. Scope and the development of epistemic modality. English Language and Linguistics 1: 295-317.Google Scholar
Núñez-Pertejo, Paloma. 1999. Be going to + infinitive: Origin and development. Some relevant cases from the Helsinki Corpus. Studia Neophilologica 71: 135-142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, Edward. 2007. The snowclones data base. [URL]
Patten, Amanda L. 2012. The English IT-Cleft: A Constructional Account and a Diachronic Investigation. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey. 2003. Phrases for lazy writers in kit form. Language Log, October 27.Google Scholar
. 2004. Snowclones: Lexicographical dating to the second. Language Log, January 16.Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti. 2004. Grammaticalisation from side to side: On the development of beside (s) . In Corpus Approaches to Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 13], Hans Lindquist & Christian Mair (eds), 151-170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve E. 1988. Grammaticalization and semantic bleaching. In Berkeley Linguistics Society 14: General Session and Parasession on Grammaticalization, Shelley Axmaker, Annie Jaisser & Helen Singmaster (eds), 389-405. Berkeley CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1995. The role of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization. Paper presented at ICHL XII, Manchester University.Google Scholar
. 2012. The status of onset contexts in analysis of micro-changes. In English Corpus Linguistics: Crossing Paths, Merja Kytö (ed.), 221-255. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
. Forthcoming. Toward a coherent account of grammatical constructionalization. In Barðdal, Gildea, Smirnova & Sommerer (eds).
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trips, Carola. 2009. Lexical Semantics and Diachronic Morphology: The Development of -hood, -dom and -ship in the History of English. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme. 2008a. Constructions in grammaticalization and lexicalization: Evidence from the history of a composite predicate construction in English. In Constructional Approaches to English Grammar, Graeme Trousdale & Nikolas Gisborne (eds), 33-67. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2008b. A constructional approach to lexicalization processes in the history of English: Evidence from possessive constructions. Word Structure 1: 156-177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008c. Words and constructions in grammaticalization: The end of the English impersonal construction. In Studies in the History of the English Language, IV:Empirical and Analytical Advances in the Study of English Language Change, Susan Fitzmaurice & Donka Minkova (eds), 301-326. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme & Norde, Muriel. 2013, Degrammaticalization and constructionalization: Two case studies. Language Sciences 36: 32-46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vandewinkel, Sigi & Davidse, Kristin. 2008. The interlocking paths of development of emphasizer adjective pure . Journal of Historical Pragmatics 9: 255-287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Visser, Fredericus Theodorus. 1969. An Historical Syntax of the English Language, II. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Zhan, Fangqiong. 2012. The Structure and Function of the Chinese Copular Construction. PhD dissertation. Stanford University.
Zwicky, Arnold. 2006. Snowclone mountain? Language Log, March 13. [URL]Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Wałaszewska, Ewa
2023. Non-literal uses of proper names in XYZ constructions. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 33:3  pp. 368 ff. DOI logo
Zhan, Fangqiong
2022. The Development of the Chinese Monosyllabic Motion-Directional Constructions: A Diachronic Constructional Approach. In Chinese Lexical Semantics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13250],  pp. 353 ff. DOI logo
François, Jacques & Raja Gmir
2020. Voir désémantisé : quand A n’a rien à voir avec B. Syntaxe & Sémantique N° 20:1  pp. 125 ff. DOI logo
Fløgstad, Guro
2017. Revisiting Perfect/Preterit instability across Romance. On functional motivations for diverging paths. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 49:2  pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
Portolés Lázaro, José
1970. Significado y sentidos de la construcción 'X hizo/ se marcó un Nombre propio'. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 69  pp. 306 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.