Cover not available
Part of
Grammaticalization – Theory and Data
Edited by Sylvie Hancil and Ekkehard König
[Studies in Language Companion Series 162] 2014
► pp. 129–156

More Thoughts on the Grammaticalization of Personal Pronouns

Evidence from the history of Japanese

The grammatical category of personal pronouns is one of the most researched domains in Japanese as well as in other languages. In fact, works on the genesis and development of Japanese personal pronouns in comparison to those in other languages have been continuously reported long before the notion of grammaticalization was introduced and became an important concept in studies of language change. While preceding studies mostly lay emphasis on the different behaviors between Japanese personal pronouns and the counterparts in European languages, Heine and Song (2010, 2011) exemplify some features common among particular sets of languages i.e. referential shifting between different pronouns, especially from third to second person. As a supplemental survey to Heine and Song (2010, 2011), the present study aims to point out other pathways, especially from first to second person, through which personal pronouns are grammaticalized more in Japanese than in other languages.
Published online: 24 September 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.162.08shi
References (92)
References
Aoki, Saburo. 1989. Bumpoo no taishooteki kenkyuu: Furansugo to Nihongo (A contrastive analysis of grammar in French and Japanese). In Nihongo to Nihongokyooiku, 5 (Japanese and Japanese Pedagogy 5), Yoshinori Yamaguchi (ed.), 290-311. Tokyo: Meiji-shoin.Google Scholar
Ariel, Mira. 2000. The development of person agreement markers. In Usage-Based Models of Language, Michael Barlow & Suzanne Kemmer (eds), 197-260. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Bhat, Darbhe Naryana Shankara. 2004. Pronouns. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Biq, Yang-O. 1991. The multiple uses of the second person singular pronoun ni in conversational Mandarin. Journal of Pragmatics 16: 307-321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blake, Frank Ringgold. 1934. The origin of pronouns of the first and second person. The American Journal of Philology 55: 244-248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradley, David. 1993. Pronouns in Burmese-Lolo. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 16 (1): 157-215.Google Scholar
Brugmann, Karl. 1904. Die Demonstrativpronomina der Indogermanischen Sprachen. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. 2003. Cognitive processes in grammaticalization. In The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, 2, Michael Tomasello (ed.), 145-167. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
. 2007. Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Camara Jr., Joaquim Mattoso. 1972. The Portuguese Language, translated by Anthony J. Naro. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 1999. Historical Linguistics, 1st edn. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen-Ren. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chiat, Shulamuth. 1986. Personal pronouns. In Language Acquisition, 2nd edn, Paul Fletcher & Michael Garman (eds), 339-355. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chirasombutti, Voravudhi. 1995. Self-Reference in Japanese and Thai. A Comparative Study. PhD dissertation, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Cooke, Joseph R. 1968. Pronominal Reference in Thai, Burmese, and Vietnamese. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian. 2005. Sociolinguistics: The Study of Speaker’s Choices. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cysouw, Michael A. 2003. The Paradigmatic Structure of Person Marking. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 1999. Demonstratives [Typological Studies in Language 42]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diller, Anthony. 2001. Grammaticalization and Tai syntactic change. In Essays in Tai Linguistics, M.R. Kalaya Tingsabadh & Arthur S. Abramson (eds), 139-175. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.Google Scholar
Durie, Mark. 1985. A Grammar of Acehnese. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nick J. 2007. A Grammar of Lao. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas & Wilkins, David. 2000. In the mind’s ear: Semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language 76(3): 546-592. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frellesvig, Bjarke. 2010. A History of the Japanese Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fujii, Noriko. 1991. Historical Discourse Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fukui, Kyuzo (ed.). 1938. Kokugogaku Taikei 15 (An outline of the Japanese Language 15). Tokyo: Kooseikaku.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1976. Topic, pronoun and grammatical agreement. In Topic and Subject, Charles N. Li (ed.), 149-89. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1998. From first to second person: The history of Amerind *k (i) . In Functional Approaches to Language, Culture and Cognition [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 163], David G. Lockwood, Peter H. Fries & James E. Copeland (eds), 413-426. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2002. On the role of context in grammaticalization. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 83-101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Song, Kyung-An. 2010. On the genesis of personal pronouns: Some conceptual sources. Language and Cognition 2(1): 117-148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. On the grammaticalization of personal pronouns. Journal of Linguistics 47: 587–630. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Helmbrecht, Johannes. 2004. Personal Pronouns. Erfurt: University of Erfurt.Google Scholar
Ide, Sachiko & Yoshida, Megumi. 1999. Sociolinguistics: Honorifics and titles. In The Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, Natsuko Tsujimura (ed.), 444-480. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ikegami, Akihiko. 1972. Daimeishi no Hensen (Transition of pronouns). Hinshibetsu Nihon Bumpoo Kooza 2: Meishi Daimeishi (Japanese Grammar Series 2: Nouns and Pronouns), Kazuhiko Suzuki & Ohoki Hayashi (eds), 123-162. Tokyo: Meiji-shoin.Google Scholar
Ishiyama, Osamu. 2008. Diachronic Perspectives on Personal Pronouns in Japanese. PhD dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi & Ingkaphirom, Preeya. 2009. A Reference Grammar of Thai. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Jacquesson, Francois. 2001. Person-marking in TB languages of north-east India. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 24(1): 113-144.Google Scholar
Jahangiri, Nader. 2000. A Sociolinguistic Study of Persian in Teheran. Tokyo: Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1924. The Philosophy of Grammar. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Stefan, Ichikawa, Yasuko, Kobayashi, Noriko & Yamamoto, Hilofumi. 2001. Japanese: A Comprehensive Grammar, 1st edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne. 1993. The Middle Voice [Typological Studies in Language 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kikusawa, Ritsuko. 2002. Proto Central Pacific Ergativity. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Kitagawa, Chisato & Lehrer, Adrienne. 1990. Impersonal uses of personal pronouns. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 739-759. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kitahara, Yasuo (ed.). 2002. Meikyo Kokugo Jiten (The Meikyo Dictionary of the Japanese Language). Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
(ed.). 2006. Nihon Kokugo Daijiten (The Unabridged Dictionary of the Japanese Language), 2nd edn. Tokyo: Shogakukan.Google Scholar
Lee, Iksop. & Ramsey, S. Robert. 2000. The Korean Language. Albany NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1981. Mandarin Chinese. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Listen, Paul. 1999. The Emergence of German Polite Sie. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lockwood, William Burley. 1968. Historical German Syntax. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej & Siewierska, Anna (eds). 2011. Impersonal Constructions: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series 124]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Katsumi. 2010. Personal Pronouns of the World’s Languages and Their Genetic Relationship (written in Japanese). Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Kazuko. 2003. Intonation Units in Japanese Conversation [Studies in Language Companion Series 65]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Roy Andrew Jr. 1967. The Japanese Language. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1999. The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Miwa, Masashi. 2000. Ninshooshi to Keigo (Personal Pronouns and Honorifics). Kyoto: Jinbun-shoin.Google Scholar
. 2005. Ichininsho Nininsho to Taiwa (Dialogue with First and Second Person). Kyoto: Jinbun-shoin.Google Scholar
. 2010. Nihongo Ninshooshi no Fushigi(The Mystery of Japanese Personal Pronouns). Kyoto: Houritsubunka-sha.Google Scholar
Morimoto, Tetsuro. 1985. Nihongo no Omote to Ura (The Inside and Outside of the Japanese Language). Tokyo: Shinchosha.Google Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter & Harré, Rom. 1990. Pronouns and People. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter. 2008. Functional Categories. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norman, Jerry. 1988. Chinese. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Nguyen, Ðình-Hoà. 1997. Vietnamese [London Oriental and African Language Library 9]. Amsterdam: John Banjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, Patricia E. 1994. ‘You could feel it through the skin’: Agency and positioning in prisoners’ stubbing stories. Text 14(1): 45-75.Google Scholar
Oshima-Takane, Yuriko. 1992. Analysis of pronominal errors: A case study. Journal of Child Language 19: 111-131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ri, Chōha. 2002. Nihongo Shiji Taikei no Rekishi (The History of the Japanese Demonstrative Paradigm). Kyoto: Kyoto University Press.Google Scholar
Sakihara, Mitsugo. 2006. Okinawan-English Wordbook. Honolulu HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Sakuma, Kanae. 1936. Gendai Nihongo no Hyoogen to Gohoo (Expressions and Phraseologies in Modern Japanese). Tokyo: Kooseikaku.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1929. The status of linguistics as a science. Language 5(1): 207-214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibasaki, Reijirou. 2005. Personal Pronouns and Argument Structure in Japanese. Discourse Frequency, Diachrony and Typology. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
. 2006. Where does first person go across time and space? Journal of Foreign Language 9 (2): 43-54.Google Scholar
. 2008. Subject cliticization in English and Japanese: A case of second person forms. Southern Review 23: 113-130.Google Scholar
2010. Frequency as a cause of semantic change. In Formal Evidence in Grammaticalization Research [Typological Studies in Language 94], An Van linden, Jean-Christoph Verstraete & Kristin Davidse (eds), 225-244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. 2011. Another look at the grammaticalization of personal pronouns: A supplemental survey to Heine & Song (2010, 2011). Ms, Okinawa International University.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. 2004. Person. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sohn, Ho-Min. 1994. Korean. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Solnit, David B. 1997. Eastern Kayah Li. Honolulu HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Sugamoto, Nobuko. 1989. Pronominality: A noun-pronoun continuum. In Linguistic Categorization [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 61], Roberta Corrigan, Fred Eckman & Michael Noonan (eds), 267-291. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sugimoto, Tsutomi. 1983. Nihon Honyakugoshi no Kenkyuu (A Historical Survey of the Works on Japanese Translations). Tokyo: Yasaka-shoten.Google Scholar
. 2003. Kindai yakugo o kenshoosuru (An inspection of Modern Japanese translation). Kokubungakukaishaku to Kanshoo 68: 236-243.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Takao. 1973. Kotoba to Bunka (Language and Culture). Tokyo: Iwanami-bunko.Google Scholar
. 1982. Jishooshi to taishooshi no hikaku (A contrastive study of terms for self and other). In Nichiei Hikaku Kooza, 5 (A Contrastive Study of Japanese and English 5), Tetsuya Kunihiro (ed.), 17-59. Tokyo: Taishuukan-shoten.Google Scholar
Terasawa, Yoshio (ed.). 1997. The Kenkyusha Dictionary of English Etymology. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.Google Scholar
Thompson, Laurence C. 1987. A Vietnamese Reference Grammar. Honolulu HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2010. (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 29-72. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard B. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Tsujimura, Toshihiko. 1968. Keigo no Shiteki Kenkyuu (A Historical Study of the Japanese Respect Terms). Tokyo: Tokyodoo.Google Scholar
Ueda, Kazutoshi (ed.). 1965. Daijiten (Encyclopedia of Words). Tokyo: Kodan-sha.Google Scholar
Von Humboldt, Wilhelm. 1830. Über die Verwandtschaft der Ortsadverbien mit dem Pronomen in einigen Sprachen. Berlin: Gedruckt in der Druckerei der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Wheatley, Julian K. 2007. Burmese. In The Sino-Tibetan Languages, Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds), 195-207. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yamada, Y. 1915. Heikemonogatari no Gohoo (Phraseologies of The Tale of the Heike). Tokyo: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
Yan, Yi & Siewierska, Anna. 2011. Referential impersonal constructions in Mandarin. In Impersonal Constructions: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series 124], Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds), 547-580. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha, Wang, Jiao & Tsz-Kwan, Lam Charles. 2011. From anaphoric to pragmatic: On the grammaticalization of Classical Chinese ĕr . Paper presented at ICHL20 >, Osaka, Japan.
Corpus
The Corpus of Contemporary American English 1990-2012 (COCA), Brigham Young University UT. (Mark Davies).
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.