Part of
Grammaticalization – Theory and Data
Edited by Sylvie Hancil and Ekkehard König
[Studies in Language Companion Series 162] 2014
► pp. 203234
Altenberg, Bengt
1986Contrastive linking in spoken and written English. In English in Speech and Writing. A Symposium, Gunnel Tottie & Ingegerd Bäcklund (eds), 13-40. Uppsala: Almquist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter
1996The pre-front field in spoken German and its relevance as a grammaticalization position. Pragmatics 6(3): 295-322. Special issue, ed. by Johannes Wagner & Cecilia Ford).Google Scholar
2009On-line syntax: Thoughts on the temporality of spoken language. Language Sciences 31(1): 1-13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter & Günthner, Susanne
2005Die Entstehung von Diskursmarkern im Deutschen. Ein Fall von Grammatikalisierung? In Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen, Torsten Leuschner, Tanja Mortelmanns & Sarah De Groot (eds), 335-362. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar & Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2002On the development of final ‘though’: A case of grammaticalization? In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 345-361. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas
1988Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane
1987Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen
1999Politeness: Some universals in language use. In The Discourse Reader, Adam Jaworski & Nikolas Coupland (eds), 321-335. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Claridge, Claudia & Arnovick, Leslie
2010Pragmaticalisation and discursisation. In Handbook of Pragmatics: Historical Pragmatics, Andreas Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds), 165-192. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2011Grammaticalization and conversation. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds), 424-437. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Thompson, Sandra A
2000Concessive patterns in conversation. In Cause - Condition - Concession - Contrast. Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives, Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Bernd Kortmann (eds), 381-410. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
2000Explaining Language Change. An Evolutionary Approach. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Defour, Tine & Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie
2010‘Positive appraisal’ as a core meaning of well: A corpus-based analysis in Middle and Early Modern English data. English Studies 91(6): 643-673. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth & Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie
(eds) 2011Grammaticalization and (inter)subjectification of discourse markers. Special issue of Linguistics 49(2).Google Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf
2008Verstehen im Gespräch. In Sprache - Kognition - Kultur. Jahrbuch des Instituts für Deutsche Sprache 2007, Heidrun Kämper & Ludwig M. Eichinger (eds), 225-261. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Detges, Ulrich
2006From speaker to subject. The obligatorization of the Old French subject pronouns. In La linguistique au coeur. Valence verbale, grammaticalisation et corpus. Mélanges offerts à Lene Schøsler à l’occasion de son 60e anniversaire, Hanne Lette Andersen, Merete Birkelund & Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen (eds), 75-103. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2011Pragmaticalization (defined) as grammaticalization of discourse functions. Linguistics 49(2): 365-390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erman, Britt & Kotsinas, Ulla-Britt
1993Pragmaticalization: The case of ba’ and you know . Studier i modern sprakvetenskap 10: 76-92.Google Scholar
Fanego, Teresa
2010Paths in the development of elaborative discourse markers: Evidence from Spanish. In Subjectification, intersubjectification, and grammaticalization, KristinDavidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 197-237. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Foolen, Ad
1991Polyfunctionality and the semantics of adversative conjunctions. Multilingua 10(1-2): 79-92.Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia & Thompson, Sandra A
1996Interactional units in conversation: syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In Interaction and Grammar, Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 238-276. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1999What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics 31: 931-952. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1991The evolution of dependent clause morpho-syntax in Biblical Hebrew. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 2: Types of Grammatical Markers [Typological Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 257-310. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haselow, Alexander
2012aSubjectivity, intersubjectivity and the negotiation of common ground in spoken discourse: Final particles in English. Language & Communication 32(3): 182-204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012bDiscourse organization and the rise of final then in the history of English. In English Historical Linguistics 2010: Selected papers from the sixteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL-16), Pécs, Iré n, Hegedüs & Alexandra Fodor (eds), 153-175. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2004On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization. In Up and Down the Cline: The Nature of Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 59], Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (eds), 17-44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2002On the role of context in grammaticalization. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), 83-101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P
2004Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In What Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its Components, Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds), 21-42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J
1998Emergent Grammar. In The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, Michael Tomasello (ed.), 155-175. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2001Grammatical constructions and their discourse origins: Prototype or family resemblance? In Applied Cognitive Linguistics: Theory, Acquisition, and Language Pedagogy, Martin Pütz & Susanne Niemeier (eds), 109-130. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1993Caveat speaker: preliminary notes on recipient topic-shift implicature. Research on Language and Social Interaction 26(1): 1-30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemenade, Ans van & Los, Bettelou
2006Discourse adverbs and clausal syntax in Old and Middle English. In The Handbook of the History of English, Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds), 224-248. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Min-Joo. & Jahnke, Nathan
2011The meaning of utterance-final ‘even’. Journal of English Linguistics 39(1): 36-64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard
1986Conditionals, concessive conditionals and concessives: Areas of contrast, overlap and neutralization. In On Conditionals, Elizabeth Closs Traugott, Alice ter Meulen, Judy Snitzer Reilly & Charles A. Ferguson (eds), 229-246. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1995[1982] Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
2002New reflections on grammaticalization and lexicalization. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 1-18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenker, Ursula
2010Argument and Rhetoric: Adverbial Connectors in the History of English. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene H
2004Collaborative turn sequences. In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 125], Gene H. Lerner (ed.), 225-256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek
1991Semantic change and heterosemy in grammaticalization. Language 67: 475-546. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linell, Per
2007Dialogicality in languages, minds and brains: Is there a convergence between dialogism and neuro-biology? Language Sciences 29(5): 605-620. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mulder, Jean & Thompson, Sandra A
2008The grammaticization of but as a final particle in English conversation. In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifunctionality of Conjunctions [Typological Studies in Language 80], Ritva Laury (ed), 179-204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu
1991BUT, ONLY, JUST: Focusing on Adverbial Change in Modern English 1500-1900. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Pomeranz, Anita
1984Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis, J. Maxwell Atkison & John Heritage (eds), 57-101. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Jefferson, Gail
1974A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696-735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A
1996aConfirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology 104: 161-216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996bTurn organization: One direction for inquiry into grammar and interaction. In Interaction and Grammar, Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 52-133. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, Scott
2000Viewpoints and polysemy. Linking adversative and causal meanings of discourse markers. In Cause - Condition - Concession - Contrast: Cognitive and discourse perspectives, Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Bernd Kortmann (eds), 257-281. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert
1978Assertion. In Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.), 215-323. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tabor, Whitney & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1998Structural scope expansion and grammaticalization. In The Limits of Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 37], Anna Giacalone Ramat & Paul Hopper (eds), 229-272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1995The role of the development of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization. Paper presented at the ICHL XII, Manchester 1995. [URL] (15.01.2014)Google Scholar
2003Constructions in grammaticalization. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian A. Joseph & Richard Janda (eds), 624-647. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010aDialogic contexts as motivations for syntactic change. In Studies in the History of the English Language, V: Variation and Change in English Grammar and Lexicon: Contemporary Approaches, Robert A. Cloutier, Anne Marie Hamilton-Brehm & William Kretzschmar, Jr. (eds), 11-27. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010bGrammaticalization. In Continuum Companion to Historical Linguistics, Silvia Luraghi & Vit Bubenik (eds), 269-283. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard B
2002Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme
2013Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waltereit, Richard
2002Imperatives, interruption in conversation, and the rise of discourse markers: A study of Italian ‘guarda’. Linguistics 40(5): 987-1010. DOI logoGoogle Scholar