Part of
Grammaticalization – Theory and Data
Edited by Sylvie Hancil and Ekkehard König
[Studies in Language Companion Series 162] 2014
► pp. 235256
References (16)
Anscombre, Jean Claude & Ducrot, Oswald
1977Deux mais en francais? Lingua 43: 23-40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, M.M. Jocelyne
2006Vers une typologie linguistique du détachement à fondement ouralien d'Europe. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 101(1) : 173-223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foolen, Ad
2011Pragmatic markers in a sociopragmatic perspective. In Pragmatics of Society, Gisle Andersen & Karin Aijmer (eds), 217-242. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia & Thompson, Sandra A
1996Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In Interaction and Grammar [Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 13], Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 134-184. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos
2004The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
1991Parenthetical adverbials: The radical orphan approach. In Aspects of Modern English Linguistics: Papers Presented to Masatomo Ukaji on his 60th birthday, Shuji Chiba, Akira Ogawa, Yasuaki Fuiwara, Noria Yamada, Osamu Koma & Takao Yagi (eds), 232–254. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2011On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35: 852-897. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2013On discourse markers: Grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something else? Linguistics 51(6): 1205-1247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mulder, Jean & Thompson, Sandra A
Mulder, Jean, Thompson, Sandra A. & Penry Williams
Cara 2009. Final but in Australian English conversation. In Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English: Grammar and Beyond [Varieties of English around the World G39], Pam Peters, Peter Collins & Adam Smith (eds) 337 358 Amsterdam John Benjamins DOI logo
Pomerantz, Anita
1984Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features found in preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In Structures of Social Action, Studies in Conversation Analysis, J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds), 232–254. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Jefferson, Gail, Sacks, Harvey
1977The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 52: 361-382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2007Discussion article: Discourse markers, modal particles, and contrastive analysis, synchronic and diachronic. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 6: 139-157.Google Scholar
2010Dialogic contexts as motivations for syntactic change. In Variation and Change in English Grammar and Lexicon, Robert A. Cloutier, Anne Marie Hamilton-Brehm & William Kretzschmar (eds), 11-27. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Waltereit, Richard & Detges, Ulrich
2007Different functions, different histories. Modal particles and discourse markers from a diachronic point of view. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 6: 61-80.Google Scholar
Waltereit, Richard
2012On the origins of grammaticalization and other types of language change in discourse strategies. In Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series 130], Kristin Davidse, Tine Breban, Lieselotte Brems & Tanja Mortelmans (eds), 51-72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by 2 other publications

Hancil, Sylvie
2018. Discourse coherence and intersubjectivity: The development of final but in dialogues. Language Sciences 68  pp. 78 ff. DOI logo
Aijmer, Karin
2016. Pragmatic markers as constructions. The case of anyway. In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178],  pp. 29 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.