Cover not available
Part of
Grammaticalization – Theory and Data
Edited by Sylvie Hancil and Ekkehard König
[Studies in Language Companion Series 162] 2014
► pp. 257–286

“Final hanging but” in American English

Where a formal coordinator meets a functional subordinator

Mulder and Thompson (2006, 2008) point out that the final hanging but ([X but]) developed from initial but (X [but Y]) through a sequence of formal reanalyses, and insightfully observe the functional and formal parallelism between the development of the hanging type of final but and the final particalization of the Japanese subordinator -kedo. The present article demonstrates that but (and and as well) can perform a terminal bracketing function and serve as functional subordinators in spoken American English, and that they behave like final particles when the sentences are truncated. Although they are not so final-particalized as Australian final but, their interpersonal functions in final position are edging them closer to the status of final particles in spoken American English.
Published online: 24 September 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.162.13izu
References (55)
References
Abraham, Werner. 1991. The grammaticization of the German modal particles. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, vol. II, Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 331–380. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar & Couper-Kuhlen, E. 2002. On the development of final though . In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 345-61. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 1992. The historical present in Charlotte Bronte's novels: Some discourse functions. Style 26(2): 221-244.Google Scholar
Chin, J. 1987. Syuujoshi: Hanashite-to kikite-no ninshiki-no gyappu-o umeru-tameno bunsetsuji. Nihongogaku 6(10): 93-109.Google Scholar
Christofer, Michael. 1996. Koi-ni Ochite (Falling in Love) [Kadokawa Script Book Series]. Tokyo: Kadokawa.Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter W. & Jackendoff, Ray. 1997. Semantic subordination despite syntactic coordination. Linguistic Inquiry 28(2): 195-217.Google Scholar
Davison, Alice. 1979. Some mysteries of subordination. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 9(1): 105-128.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan, Cumming, Susanna & Paolino, Danae. 1993. Outline of discourse transcription. In Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research, Jane A. Edwards & Martin D. Lampert (eds), 45-89. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Chafe, Wallace L., Meyer, Charles & Thompson, Sandra A. 2000. Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part One. Philadelphia PA: Linguistic Data Consortium. [URL] santa-barbara-corpus>Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Chafe, Wallace L., Meyer, Charles, Thompson, Sandra A. & Martey, Nii. 2003. Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part Two. Philadelphia PA: Linguistic Data Consortium. [URL]Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. & Englebretson, Robert. 2004. Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part Three. Philadelphia PA: Linguistic Data Consortium. [URL]Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W., & Englebretson, Robert. 2005. Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part Four. Philadelphia PA: Linguistic Data Consortium. [URL]Google Scholar
Evans, Nicolas. 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fujiwara, Yoichi. 1982. Hoogen Bunmatsushi ‘Bunmatsujoshi’ no Kenkyuu (Joo). Tokyo: Shunyoodoo.Google Scholar
. 1986. Hoogen Bunmatsushi ‘Bunmatsujoshi’ no Kenkyuu (Ge). Tokyo: Shunyoodoo.Google Scholar
Haselow, Alexander. 2011. Discourse marker and modal particle: The functions of utterance-final then in spoken English. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 3603–3623. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2007. Coordination. In Language Typology and Linguistic Description, II: Complex Constructions, 2nd edn, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 1-51. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan B. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1973. On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4(4): 465-197.Google Scholar
Izutsu, Katsunobu & Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita. 2012. Exaptation and adaptation: Two historical routes to final particles. A paper presented at the 45th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea, Stockholm University, August 2012.Google Scholar
. 2013. From discourse markers to modal particles: Where the position reveals about the continuum. In Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: Categorization and Description, Liesbeth Degand, Bert Cornillie & Paoala Pietrandrea (eds), 217-235. Leuven: University of Louvain. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita & Izutsu, Katsunobu. 2014a. Truncation and backshift: Two pathways to sentence-final coordinating conjunctions. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 15(1): 92-122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014b. ‘Leap’ or ‘continuum’?: Grammaticalization pathways from conjunctions to sentence-final particles. In Language and Creative Mind, Mike Borkent, Barbara Dancygier & Jennifer Hinnell (eds), 83-99. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Mann, William C. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1987. Rhetorical Structure Theory: A Theory of Text Organization, USC Information Sciences Institute, Technical Report ISI/RS-87-190.Google Scholar
Masuoka, Takashi. 1997. Fukubun. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Matsumura, Akira (ed.). 1971. Nihon Bunpoo Daijiten. Tokyo: Meijishoin.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1988. The structure of discourse and ‘subordination.’ In Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 18], John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 275-329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Minami, Fujio. 1974. Gendai Nihongo-no Koozoo. Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
. 1993. Gendai Nihongo Bunpoo-no Rinkaku. Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
Mittwoch, Anita. 1979. Final parentheticals with English questions – Their illocutionary function and grammar. Journal of Pragmatics 3: 401-412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mulder, Jean & Thompson, Sandra A. 2006. The Grammaticization of but as a final particle in English conversation. In Selected Papers From the 2005 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, Keith Allan (ed.), 1–18. [URL]Google Scholar
. 2008. The grammaticization of but as a final particle in English conversation. In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifunctionality of Conjunctions [Typological Studies in Language 80], Ritva Laury (ed), 179–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mulder, Jean, Thompson, Sandra A. & Williams, Cara Penny. 2009. Final but in Australian English Conversation. In Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English: Grammar and Beyond [Varieties of English around the World G39], Pam Peters, Peter Collins & Adam Smith (eds), 339–359. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nakano, N. 1992. “Ne”-to “yo”-no hataraki-nitsuite. Bulletin of the Faculty of Education, Yamaguchi University 41(1): 1-18.Google Scholar
. 1995. Shuujoshi “sa”-to “na”-no hataraki-nitsuite. In Tsukishima Hiroshi Hakushi Koki Kinen Kokugogaku Ronsyuu, Tsukishima Hiroshi Hakushi Koki Kinenkai (ed.), 1063-1085. Tokyo: Kyukoshoin.Google Scholar
Noda, Naoshi, Masuoka, Takashi, Sakuma, Mayumi & Takubo, Yukinori. 2002. Fukubun-to Danwa. Tokyo: Iwanami.Google Scholar
Norrick, Neil R. 2009. Conjunctions in final position in everyday talk. In Language in Life, and a Life in Language: Jacob Mey – A Festschrift, Bruce Fraser & Ken Turner (eds), 319-328. Bingley: Emerald. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohori, Toshio. 1995. Remarks on suspended clauses: A contribution to Japanese phraseology. In Essays in Semantics and Pragmatics: In Honor of Charles J. Fillmore [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 32], Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 201–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. 2000a. Framing effects in Japanese non-final clauses: Toward an optimal grammar-pragmatics interface. BLS 23: 471–480.Google Scholar
. 2000b. Gengochishiki-toshite-no koobun: Fukubun-no ruikeiron-ni-mukete. In Ninchigengogaku-no Hatten, Shigeru Sakahara (ed.), 281-315. Tokyo: Hituzi.Google Scholar
Ozaki, Makoto & Saeki, Namie. 1991. Hachigatsu-no Kujira (The Whales of August): English-Japanese Screen Library 6. Tokyo: Nanundoo.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1984. Principles of gestalt perception in the temporal organization of narrative texts. Linguistics 22: 779-809.Google Scholar
Ross, Eric & Groom, Winston. 1996. Foresuto Ganpu: Ichigo Ichie (Forest Gump) [Kadokawa Script Book Series]. Tokyo: Kadokawa.Google Scholar
Sakuma, Kanae. 1983. Gendai Nihongohoo-no Kenkyuu, rev. edn. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Saji, Keizo. 1957. Shuujoshi-no Kinoo. Kokugokokubun 26(7): 23-31.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shirakawa, Hiroyuki. 2009. ‘Iisashibun’ no Kenkyuu. Tokyo: Kuroshio.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Hideo. 1976. Gendai nihongo-niokeru syuujoshi-no hataraki-to sono soogo shoosetsu-nitsuite. Kokugo-to Kokubungaku 53(11): 58-70.Google Scholar
Takahashi, Taro. 1993. Shooryaku-niyotte dekita jutsugo keishiki. Nihongogaku 9(12): 18-26.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1990. You just don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York NY: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. 1987. “Subordination” and narrative event structure. In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 11], Russell S. Tomlin (ed.), 435-454. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Longacre, Robert E. 1985. Adverbial clauses. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, II: Complex Constructions, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 171-234. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Tomlin, Russell S. 1985. Foreground-background information and the syntax of subordination. Text 5(1-2): 85-122.Google Scholar
Waltereit, Richard & Detges, Ulrich. 2012. Moi, je ne sais pas vs. je ne sais pas, moi: French disjoint pronouns in the left vs. right periphery. Abstract of a paper presented at Newcastle/Northumbria Joint Linguistics and Language Sciences Research Day, Northumbria University, January 2012.Google Scholar
Yoda, Yusuke. 2010. Sore wa Hontooni Tooikoozo? Nihongo Nihonbunka Kenkyuu20: 65–75.Google Scholar