Cover not available
Part of
On Diversity and Complexity of Languages Spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia
Edited by Pirkko Suihkonen and Lindsay J. Whaley
[Studies in Language Companion Series 164] 2014
► pp. 3–66

The tense-aspect system of Khorchin Mongolian

 | Stockholm University
Khorchin, a Mongolian dialect spoken in eastern Inner Mongolia, has a tense-aspect system slightly simpler than Middle Mongol and considerably simpler than Central Mongolian dialects (Khalkha, Chakhar). While it can express the time stability of ongoing events with many nuances, present habitual and generic events are not distinguished. The existence of a present perfect category is doubtful, but in any case it doesn’t extend to the past as participle-copula-combinations are impossible. Evidentiality was lost in the central verbal system, but a non-obligatory quotative/hearsay marker exists. This article is an attempt to fit these phenomena into a coherent system of tense, aspect and related notions and to explore some of its diachronic implications.
Published online: 17 December 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.164.01bro
References (41)
References
Ashimura, Takashi. 2002. Mongorugo jarōto gengo no -lɛ: no yōhō ni tsuite (On the function of the suffix -lɛ in Jarut Mongolian). Tōkyō daigaku gengogaku ronshū 21: 147–200.Google Scholar
Bayancoɣtu. 2002. Qorcin aman ayalɣun-u sudulul (A grammar of Khorchin Mongolian). Kökeqota: Öbür mongɣul-un yeke surɣaɣuli-yin keblel-ün qoriya.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco & Lenci, Alessandro. 2012, Pluractionality, habituality and gnomic imperfectivity. In Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect, Robert Binnick (ed.), 852–880. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Binnick, Robert. 2012. The Past Tenses of the Mongolian Verb. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bosson, James & [Ünensecen] Unensečen, B. 1962. Some notes on the dialect of the Khorchin Mongols. In American Studies in Altaic Linguistics, Nicholas Poppe (ed.), 23–44. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Publications.Google Scholar
Breu, Walter. 2005. Verbalaspekt und Sprachkontakt: Ein Vergleich der Systeme zweier slavischer Minderheitensprachen (SWR/MSL). In Slavistische Linguistik 2003, Sebastian Kempgen (ed.), 37–95. München: Sagner.Google Scholar
Brosig, Benjamin. Forthcoming 1. Aspect, tense and evidentiality in Middle Mongol. Ural-Altaic Studies.
. Forthcoming 2. Aspect and epistemic notions in the present tense system of Khalkha Mongolian. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana.
. Under review. Factual vs. evidential - The past tense forms of spoken Khalkha Mongolian. In Empirical apApproaches to Evidentiality, Ad Foolen, Helen de Hoop & Gijs Mulder (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Brown, Kerry. 2007. The cultural revolution in Inner Mongolia 1967–1969. Asian Affairs XXXVIII(2): 173–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byambasan, P., C. Önörbayan, B. Pürev-Ochir, J. Sanjaa & C. Janchivdorj. 1987. Orchin cagiin mongol helnii ugzuin baiguulalt (The structure of [verbal] morphology of contemporary Mongolian). Ulaanbaatar: Shinjleh uhaanii akadyemi.Google Scholar
[Cilaɣu, Üjiyed-ün] Chuluu, Üjiyediin. 1998. Studies on Mongolian verb morphology. Toronto: University of Toronto. Unpublished doctoral thesis.Google Scholar
Cinggeltei. 1959. Mongɣul kelen-ü tusalaqu üile üge-yin tuqai (On auxiliaries in Mongolian). Öbür mongɣul-un yeke surɣaɣuli 1959: 1–103.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2012. Verbs. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Edquriyaɣci, Urana. 1996. Mongoljin aman ayalɣu (The Mongoljin dialect). Ulaɣanqada: Öbür mongɣul-un surgan kümüjil-ün keblel-ün qoriya.Google Scholar
Gorelova, Liliyam. 2002. Manchu Grammar. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Goto, K.V. 2009. Sistema finitnych form prošedšego vremeni v kalmyckom jazyke (The system of finite past tense forms in Kalmyk). Acta Linguistica Petropolitana V(2): 124-159.Google Scholar
He, Küiling. 2008. Qorcin aman ayalɣu ba qaracin tümed aman ayalɣun-u sula üge-yin qaricaɣulul (A comparison of particles in Khorchin and Kharchin-Tümed). Mongɣul kele bicig 2008(4): 20–24.Google Scholar
[Jiāng, Gēnqiōng (姜根兄)]. Jiyang, Gen siyüng. 2012. Qorcin aman ayalɣun-u bürildül kögjil-ün tuqai sudulul (On the development of Khorchin Mongolian). Kökeqota: Öbür mongɣul-un arad-un keblel-ün qoriya.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars. 1971. Aspekt im Türkischen. Uppsala: Berlingska Boktryckeriet.Google Scholar
. 2000. Viewpoint operators in European languages. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, Östen Dahl, (ed.) 27–187. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kamio, Akio. 1994. The territory of territory of information – The case of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 21: 67–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsuoka, Yūta. 2008. Mongorugo-no asupekuto-ni kan-suru kenkyū (A Study of Aspect in Mongolian). PhD dissertation, Kyūshū University.
Mönggüngerel. 1998. Naiman aman ayalɣu. Kökeqota: Öbür mongɣul-un yeke surɣaɣuli-yin keblel-ün qoriya.Google Scholar
Mönh-Amgalan, Yumjiriin. 1998. Orchin cagiin mongol xelnii baimjiin ai (Modality in contemporary Mongolian). Ulaanbaatar: Mongol ulsiin ih surguul’.Google Scholar
Mushin, Ilana. 2001. Evidentiality and Epistemological Stance – Narrative Retelling [Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 87]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. 1995. Some typological parameters of converbs. In Converbs in a Cross-linguistic Perspective, Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds). 97–136. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Orulamjab. 2013. Mongγul kelen-ü torγud ayalγun-u üile üge-yin sudulul (Verbs in Torgut Mongolian). MA thesis, Central University of Nationalities. Pre-final version, 26 May 2013.Google Scholar
Qasbaɣatur. n.d. Qaracin aman ayalɣun-u sudulul (A grammar of Kharchin Mongolian). Inner Mongolian University.
Qasgerel. 2000. Qorcin aman ayalgun-u uridcilaqu nökücel üile üge-yin tuqai (On the perfective converb in Khorchin Mongolian). Mongɣul kele udq-a jokiyal 2000(3): 75-79.Google Scholar
Skribnik, Elena & Seesing, Olga. 2014. Evidentiality in Kalmyk. In The Grammar of Knowledge, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M.W. Dixon (eds). 148-170. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sneath, David. 2000. Changing Inner Mongolia – Pastoral Mongolian Society and the Chinese State. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
[Sodubaɣatur] Cáodàobātèěr. 2007. Kālǎqìn ménggǔyǔ yánjiù (A grammar of Kharchin Mongolian). Běijīng: Mínzú chūbǎnshè chūbǎn fāxíng.Google Scholar
Song, Jae-mog. 1997. Tense, Aspect and Modality in Khalkha Mongolian. PhD dissertation, University of London, SOAS.
Street, John. 2009. On the three past tense endings of early Middle Mongolian. Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher 23: 126–159.Google Scholar
Toɣtambayar, L. 2010. Dumdadu jaɣun-u ekin-ü üy-e-yin mongɣul kelen-ü “-luɣ-a/-lüge” kelberi-yin keyisbürijijü kögjigsen yabuca (The grammaticalization process of Early Middle Mongol “-luɣ-a/-lüge”). Mongɣul-un sudulul 2010(3): 61–73.Google Scholar
Tulɣaɣuri. 1991. Qorcin aman ayalɣun-daki nökücel üile üge-yin kelberi-yin tuqai sinjilege (On converb forms in Khorchin Mongolian). Mongɣul-un sudulul 1991(3): 61–75.Google Scholar
Tulɣaɣuri & Sodu, B. 2008. Qorcin aman ayalɣun-u qubiral kögjil-ün sudulul (The development of Khorchin Mongolian). Tongliao: Öbür mongɣul-un arad-un keblel-ün qoriya.Google Scholar
Tungɣalaɣ. 1995. Qorcin aman ayalɣun-u “lai” dagaburi-yin egürge cidamji, irel garul-un tuqai (On the function and origin of the suffix -lɛ in Khorchin Mongolian). Monggul kele bicig 1995(7).Google Scholar
Ürececeg. 2011. Aɣula balɣasun-u mongɣulcud-un aman yariyan-u sudulul (The Mongolian Regiolect of Aɣula Township). MA thesis, Inner Mongolian Nationalities University Tongliao.Google Scholar
Yuvan cuu. 1992. Qorcin aman ayalɣun-u “-lai” daɣaburi-yin tuqai (On the suffix -lɛ in Khorchin Mongolian). Mongɣul kele bicig 1992(1): 29–33.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Brosig, Benjamin
2021. Expressing intent, imminence and ire by attributing speech/thought in Mongolian. Folia Linguistica 55:2 ► pp. 433 ff. DOI logo
Brosig, Benjamin
2021. Expressing intent, imminence and ire by attributing speech/thought in Mongolian. Folia Linguistica 0:0 DOI logo
Zhang, Dongbing
2021. Tense in Khorchin Mongolian: an interpersonal perspective. Language Sciences 85 ► pp. 101371 ff. DOI logo
Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
2018. The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.