Cover not available
Part of
On Diversity and Complexity of Languages Spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia
Edited by Pirkko Suihkonen and Lindsay J. Whaley
[Studies in Language Companion Series 164] 2014
► pp. 67–90

Locational and directional relations and tense and aspect marking in Chalkan, a South Siberian Turkic language

| Goethe University, Frankfurt
This paper gives an overview of South Siberian Turkic biverbal constructions with auxiliary verbs of existence, location, posture and motion and their grammaticalization ways. Their lexical component bears markers of non-finite verb forms; their auxiliary component gets finite morphology. They produce numerous actional (Aktionsart), modality and tense-aspect-modus (TAM) forms in South Siberian Turkic languages. We argue that many modern TAM forms in these languages go back to synthesized biverbal constructions and describe processes of their grammaticalization from actional forms to aspect-temporal ones in Chalkan, an unwritten Turkic variety spoken in the north of Republic Altai, Russia. This research is based on a Chalkan electronic database that was created as a result of a Russian-German co-operation project.
Keywords: biverbal constructions, Chalkan, directional relations, grammaticalization, locational, South Siberian Turkic, tense-aspect-mood
Published online: 17 December 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.164.02nev
References (31)
References
Baskakov, Nikolaj Alexeevič. 1985. Dialekt Lebedinskix tatar-čalkancev (kuu-kiži). Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
. 1997. Altaiskij jazyk. In Tjurkskie jazyki, Vol. 2, Natal’ja Vasil’evna Rogova, Ol’ga Iosifovna Romanova & Galina Alexandrovna Čerkasova (eds), 179–187.Biškek: Izdatel’skij dom “Kyrgystan”.Google Scholar
Dyrenkova, Nadežda Petrovna. 1940. Grammatika ojrotskogo jazyka. Moskva-Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
. 1941. Grammatika šorskogo jazyka. Moskva–Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
Erdal, Marcel, Nevskaya, Irina, Nugteren, Hans, Rind-Pawlowski, Monika (eds). 2013. Handbuch des Tschalkantürkischen, Part I: Texte und Glossar. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Fedina, Natal’ja. 2005. Čalkanskij jazyk v trudax Nikolaja Alexeeviča Baskakova i v nastojaščee vremja. In Jazyki korrennyx narodov Sibiri, Čalkanskij sbornik, Vol. 17, Natal’ja Nikolaevna Širobokova (ed.), 44–62. Novosibirsk: IF SO RAN.Google Scholar
. 2006. Processy sintezacii analitičeskix glagol’nyx form v čalkanskom jazyke. In Jazyki korrennyx narodov Sibiri, Čalkanskij sbornik, Vol. 18, Natal’ja Nikolaevna Širobokova (ed.), 207–215. Novosibirsk: IF SO RAN.Google Scholar
JANS 2003 = Koškareva, Natal’ja Borisovna & Širobokova, Natal’ja Nikolaevna (eds). 2003. Jazyki korennyx narodov Sibiri, Vol. 7: Ėkspedicionnye materialy. Čast' 1. Novosibirsk: IF SO RAN.Google Scholar
JANS 2003a = Koškareva, Natal’ja Borisovna & Širobokova, Natal’ja Nikolaevna (eds). 2003a. Jazyki korennyx narodov Sibiri, Ėkspedicionnye materialy, Vol. 10. Novosibirsk: IF SO RAN.Google Scholar
JANS 2004 = Koškareva, Natal’ja Borisovna & Širobokova, Natal’ja Nikolaevna (eds). Jazyki korennyx narodov Sibiri, Ėkspedicionnye materialy, vol. 13. Novosibirsk: IF SO RAN.
JANS 2004a = Širobokova, Natal’ja Nikolaevna (ed.). 2004. Jazyki korennyx narodov Sibiri, Čalkanskij sbornik, Vol. 15. Novosibirsk: IF SO RAN.Google Scholar
JANS 2005 = Širobokova, Natal’ja Nikolaevna (ed.). 2005. Jazyki korennyx narodov Sibiri, Čalkanskij sbornik, Vol. 17. Novosibirsk: IF SO RAN.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars. 1971. Aspekt im Türkischen. Vorstudien zu einer Beschreibung des türkeitürkischen Aspektsystems [Studia Turcica Upsaliensia 1]. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
. 1976. Zum Präsens der nordwestlichen und mittelasiatischen Türksprachen. In Acta Orientalia 37: 57–74.Google Scholar
. 1995. Mehrdeutigkeit in der türkischen Verbalkomposition. In Marcel Erdal & Semih Tezcan (eds), Beläk Bitig, Sprachstudien für Gerhard Doerfer zum 75. Geburtstag [Turcologica 23], 81–101. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Kokošnikova Ol’ga Jur’evna, Nikolina, Elena Vital’evna, Ozonova, Ajana Alexeevna, Tazranova & Alena Robertovna. 2003. Jazyk tubalarov i čalkancev. In Jazyki korennyx narodov Sibiri, Ėkspedicionnye materialy, Vol. 10, Natal’ja Borisovna Koškareva & Natal’ja Nikolaevna Širobokova (eds), 3–6. Novosibirsk: IF SO RAN.Google Scholar
Kurpeško, Nadežda Nikolaevna & Širobokova, Natal’ja Nikolaevna. 1991. Biverbal’nye konstrukcii s glagolami bytija -p čat, -p odur, -p čör v šorskom jazyke. Učebnoe posobie. Kemerovo: Kuzbassk. PI.Google Scholar
Nasilov, Dmitrij Mixajlovič. 1989. Problemy tjurkskoj aspektologii. Akcional’nost’. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
Nevskaya, Irina. 2005. The Typology of prospective in Turkic languages. In Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, Language Typology and Universals 58(1): 111–123. Focus on: Sentence Types and Sentence Structures , Jost Gippert, Marcel Erdal & Rainer Voßen (eds).Google Scholar
Nevskaya, Irina & Šalamaj, Ol’ga. 2009. Renewal of focal intraterminals in Shor dialects. Turkic Languages 13(1): 61–78.Google Scholar
Nevskaya, Irina, Ozonova, Ajana, Erdal, Marcel, Hans Nugteren & Monika Rind-Pawlowski. In print. The Chalkan. In Red Book of Endangered Turkic Languages, to be published in Ankara, Turkey.
Nikolina Elena Vital’evna, Ozonova, Ajana Alexeevna, Kokošnikova, Ol’ga Jur’evna & Tazranova Alena Robertovna. 2003. Sociolingvističeskaja situacija u tubalarov i čalkancev. In Jazyki korennyx narodov Sibiri, Vol. 7: Ėkspedicionnye materialy, Čast’ 1, 3–9, Natal’ja Borisovna Koškareva & Natal’ja Nikolaevna Širobokova (eds). Novosibirsk: IF SO RAN.Google Scholar
Ozonova, Ajana Alexeevna, Tazranova, Alena Robertovna. 2004. Analitičeskie konstrukcii v čalkanskom dialekte (v sopostavlenii s altajskim literaturnym jazykom). In Jazyki korennyx narodov Sibiri, Čalkanskij sbornik, Vol. 15, Natal’ja Nikolaevna Širobokova (ed.), 55–72. Novosibirsk: IF SO RAN.Google Scholar
Schönig, Claus. 1984. Hilfsverben im Tatarischen, Untersuchungen zur Funktionsweise einiger Hilfsverbverbindungen [VOK XXXV]. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Šluinskij, Andrej. 2009. Biverbal’nye konstrukcii i ix leksičeskie ograničenija. In Tubalarskie ėtjudy, Sergej Tatevosov (ed.), 6–54. Moskva: IMLI RAN.Google Scholar
Tatevosov, Sergej. 2007. Akcional’nye klassy glagolov. In Struktura sobytija i semantika glagola v karačaevo-balkarskom jazyke, Elena Ljutikova & Sergej Tatevosov, et al. (eds), 78–133. Moskva: IMLI RAN.Google Scholar
Tazranova, Alena. 2012. Zu einigen altaitürkischen synthetischen Verbformen. In Areal, Typological and Historical Aspects of South Siberian Turkic [Turcologica 94], Marcel Erdal, Irina Nevskaya & Astrid Menz (eds), 217–222. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Internet sources
Russian national census of 2002: [URL] (1 May 2013)
2010: [URL] (1 May 2013)
ISO 639-3: [URL] (15 March 2012)