Cover not available
Part of
On Diversity and Complexity of Languages Spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia
Edited by Pirkko Suihkonen and Lindsay J. Whaley
[Studies in Language Companion Series 164] 2014
► pp. 401–420

The development of negation in the Transeurasian languages

 | Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz
In this article, the historical development of sentential negation is compared across the Japonic, Koreanic, Tungusic, Mongolic, and Turkic languages to make inferences about the expression of negation in the common Transeurasian proto-language. Integrating typological considerations, including grammaticalization theory, into the argumentation, the approach taken here differs from previous studies, which are limited to form–function comparison of individual markers. The historical development of negation in the Transeurasian languages is argued to involve a grammaticalization pathway whereby an independent negative verb developed into a preposed negative auxiliary and then, either transferred its inflection to the lexical verb to become an invariant preposed particle or, else, moved to a postposed position to become a suffix on the lexical verb. Taken together with the form–function correspondences of the negative markers, these correlations lead to the reconstruction of genealogically motivated cycles of grammaticalization in the Transeurasian family.
Keywords: cyclic grammaticalization, diachronic typology, genealogical relationship, negation, Transeurasian languages
Published online: 17 December 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.164.14rob
References (57)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2013. Areal diffusion and parallelism in drift: Shared grammaticalization patterns. In Shared Grammaticalization with Special Focus on the Transeurasian Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 132], Martine Robbeets & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 23–42. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan. 2009. The Jespersen cycles. In Cyclical Change [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 146], Elly van Gelderen (ed.), 35-71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. On the diachrony of negation. In The Expression of Negation, Lawrence Horn (ed.), 73-101. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Benzing, Johannes. 1955. Lamutische Grammatik, mit Bibliographie, Sprachproben und Glossar. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
. 1959. Das Tschuwaschische. In Philologiae Turcicae Fundamenta. Tomus Primus, Jean Deny, Kaare Grönbech, Helmuth Scheel & Zeki Velidi Togan (eds), 695-751. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
Bese, Lajos. 1974. On the etymology of prohibition and negation in Mongolian. Central Asiatic Journal 18: 5–8.Google Scholar
Choi, Han-Woo. 2005. Evidences of the affinity of Korean and Turkic. International Journal of Central Asian Studies 10: 29–52.Google Scholar
Clauson, Gerard. 1972. An Etymological Dictionary of Pre-thirtheenth-century Turkisch. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Negation and other verb categories in the Uralic languages. In Congressus Quintis Internationalis Fenno-Ugristarum, vol. VI, Osmo Ikola (ed.), 350-355. Turku: Suomen Kielen Seura.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 1991. The evolution of negation. Journal of linguistics 27: 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 1979. Typology of sentence negation. Linguistics 17, 79–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew. 2005. Negative morphemes. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 454-457. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Erdal, Marcel. 1991. Old Turkic Word Formation. A Functional Approach to the Lexicon [Turcologica 7]. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
. 2004. A Grammar of Old Turkic. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Frellesvig, Bjarke. 2010. A History of the Japanese Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly. 2008. Negative cycles. Linguistic Typology 12: 195–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. 2001. Syntax. An Introduction I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gorelova, Liliya 2002. Manchu Grammar. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey. 1998. Hermit crabs: Formal renewal of morphology by phonologically mediated affix substitution. Language 74: 728–759. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janhunen, Juha. 1996. Prolegomena to a comparative analysis of Mongolic and Tungusic. In Proceedings of the 38th Permanent International Altaistic Conference in Kawasaki, Japan, 7–12 August 1995, Giovanni Stary (ed.), 209–218. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars & Robbeets, Martine. 2010. Introduction. In Transeurasian Verbal Morphology in a Comparative Perspective: Genealogy, Contact, Chance [Turcologica 78], Lars Johanson & Martine Robbeets (eds), 1–5. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Krüger, John. 1961. Chuvash Manual. Introduction, Grammar, Reader and Vocabulary [Uralic and Altaic Series 7]. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel Elmo. 1987. The Japanese Language Through Time. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
. 1991. Recent research on the relationships of Japanese and Korean. In Sydney M. Lamb & Douglas E. Mitchell (eds). Sprung from Some Common Source: Investigations Into the Prehistory of Languages, 269–292. Stanford CA: University Press.Google Scholar
. 1992. A Reference Grammar of Korean. Tokyo: Tuttle.Google Scholar
. 1996. Consonant Lenition in Korean and the Macro-Altaic Question. Honolulu HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
. 1997. Un-Altaic features of the Korean verb. Japanese / Korean Linguistics 6: 3–40.Google Scholar
Menges, Karl Heinrich. 1968. Die Tungusischen Sprachen [Handbuch der Orientalistik 1. Der Nahe und der Mittlere Osten 5. Altaistik 3. Tungusologie]. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
. 1975. Altajische Studien, II. Japanisch und Altajisch [Abhandlungen für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 41(3)]. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
. 1984. Korean and Altaic. A preliminary sketch. Central Asiatic Journal 28: 234–295.Google Scholar
Miestamo, Matti. 2005. Standard Negation: The Negation of Declarative Verbal Main Clauses in a Typological Perspective [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 31]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Miller, Roy Andrew. 1971. Japanese and the Other Altaic Languages. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 1985. Altaic connections of the Old Japanese negatives. Central Asiatic Journal 31: 35–84.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Igor V. 1994. Negation in Evenki. In Typological Studies in Negation [Typological Studies in Language 28], Peter Kahrel & René van den Berg (eds), 1–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina Alekseevna. 1999. A Grammar of Udehe. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.
Payne, John R. 1985. Negation. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, 1: Clause Structure, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 197–242. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Poppe, Nicholas. 1954. Grammar of Written Mongolian. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
. 1960. Vergleichende Grammatik der altaischen Sprachen, 1: Vergleichende Lautlehre [Porta Linguarum Orientalium, Neue Serie 4]. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
. 1974. Zur Stellung des Tschuwaschischen. Central Asiatic Journal 18(2): 135–147.Google Scholar
. 1977. The problem of Uralic and Altaic affinity. Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 58: 221–225.Google Scholar
Ramstedt, Gustaf John. 1924. Die verneinung in den altaischen Sprachen. Eine semasiologische studie. Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 52: 196–215.Google Scholar
. 1935. Kalmückisches Wörterbuch. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
. 1939. Studies in Korean Etymology. [Mémoires de la Société finno-ougrienne 95.] Helsinki: Suomalai-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
. 1949. Studies in Korean Etymology [Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 95]. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
. 1952. Einführung in die altaische Sprachwissenschaft, II, Formenlehre [Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 104( 2)]. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
Robbeets, Martine. 2005. Is Japanese Related to Korean, Tungusic, Mongolic and Turkic? [Turcologica 64]. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
. 2013. Genealogically motivated grammaticalization. In Shared Grammaticalization: With Special Focus on the Transeurasian Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 132], Martine Robbeets & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 147–175. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanžeev, G.D. 1962. K voprosu ob otricanii v mongol’skich jazykach. Acta Orientalia Hungarica 15: 273–282.Google Scholar
Starostin, Sergej Anatolevič. 1991. Altajskaja problema i proisxoždenie japanskogo jazyka. Moscow: Nauk.Google Scholar
Starostin, Sergej, Dybo, Anna & Mudrak, Oleg. 2003. Etymological Dictionary of the Altaic Languages. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Unger, Jim Marshall. 2000. Reconciling comparative and internal reconstruction: The case of Old Japanese /ti, ri, ni/. Language 76: 655–681. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vovin, Alexander. 2001. Japanese, Korean and Tungusic. Evidence for genetic relationship from verbal morphology. In Altaic Affinities, Proceedings of the 40th meeting of the PIAC, Provo, Utah 1997, David B. Honey & David C. Wright (eds), 183–202. Bloomington IN: Indiana University, Research Institute for Inner Asian Studies.Google Scholar
. 2005. The end of the Altaic controversy. Central Asiatic Journal 49: 71–132.Google Scholar
. 2009. A Descriptive and Comparative Grammar of Western Old Japanese, Part 2: Adjectives, Verbs, Adverbs, Conjunctions, Particles, Postpositions [Languages of Asia 8]. Folkestone: Global Oriental.Google Scholar
Whitman, John Bradford. 1985. The Phonological Basis for the Comparison of Japanese and Korean. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
Willis, David, Lucas, Christopher & Breibarth, Anne. 2013. Comparing diachronies of negation. In The History of Negation in the Languages of Europe and the Mediterranean, 1: Case Studies [Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics], David Willis, Christopher Lucas & Anne Breibarth (eds) 1–50. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Manzelli, Gianguido
2015. Mutual influences in negative patterns between Finno-Ugric and Turkic languages in the Volga-Kama area*. In Negation in Uralic Languages [Typological Studies in Language, 108], ► pp. 633 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.