Aikhenvald, Alexandra
2013Areal diffusion and parallelism in drift: Shared grammaticalization patterns. In Shared Grammaticalization with Special Focus on the Transeurasian Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 132], Martine Robbeets & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 23–42. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan
2009The Jespersen cycles. In Cyclical Change [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 146], Elly van Gelderen (ed.), 35-71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010On the diachrony of negation. In The Expression of Negation, Lawrence Horn (ed.), 73-101. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Benzing, Johannes
1955Lamutische Grammatik, mit Bibliographie, Sprachproben und Glossar. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
1959Das Tschuwaschische. In Philologiae Turcicae Fundamenta. Tomus Primus, Jean Deny, Kaare Grönbech, Helmuth Scheel & Zeki Velidi Togan (eds), 695-751. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
Bese, Lajos
1974On the etymology of prohibition and negation in Mongolian. Central Asiatic Journal 18: 5–8.Google Scholar
Choi, Han-Woo
2005Evidences of the affinity of Korean and Turkic. International Journal of Central Asian Studies 10: 29–52.Google Scholar
Clauson, Gerard
1972An Etymological Dictionary of Pre-thirtheenth-century Turkisch. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1981Negation and other verb categories in the Uralic languages. In Congressus Quintis Internationalis Fenno-Ugristarum, vol. VI, Osmo Ikola (ed.), 350-355. Turku: Suomen Kielen Seura.Google Scholar
Croft, William
1991The evolution of negation. Journal of linguistics 27: 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen
1979Typology of sentence negation. Linguistics 17, 79–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew
2005Negative morphemes. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 454-457. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Erdal, Marcel
1991Old Turkic Word Formation. A Functional Approach to the Lexicon [Turcologica 7]. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2004A Grammar of Old Turkic. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Frellesvig, Bjarke
2010A History of the Japanese Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly
2008Negative cycles. Linguistic Typology 12: 195–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T
2001Syntax. An Introduction I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gorelova, Liliya
2002Manchu Grammar. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey
1998Hermit crabs: Formal renewal of morphology by phonologically mediated affix substitution. Language 74: 728–759. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2002World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janhunen, Juha
1996Prolegomena to a comparative analysis of Mongolic and Tungusic. In Proceedings of the 38th Permanent International Altaistic Conference in Kawasaki, Japan, 7–12 August 1995, Giovanni Stary (ed.), 209–218. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars & Robbeets, Martine
2010Introduction. In Transeurasian Verbal Morphology in a Comparative Perspective: Genealogy, Contact, Chance [Turcologica 78], Lars Johanson & Martine Robbeets (eds), 1–5. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Krüger, John
1961Chuvash Manual. Introduction, Grammar, Reader and Vocabulary [Uralic and Altaic Series 7]. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel Elmo
1987The Japanese Language Through Time. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
1991Recent research on the relationships of Japanese and Korean. In Sydney M. Lamb & Douglas E. Mitchell (eds). Sprung from Some Common Source: Investigations Into the Prehistory of Languages, 269–292. Stanford CA: University Press.Google Scholar
1992A Reference Grammar of Korean. Tokyo: Tuttle.Google Scholar
1996Consonant Lenition in Korean and the Macro-Altaic Question. Honolulu HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
1997Un-Altaic features of the Korean verb. Japanese / Korean Linguistics 6: 3–40.Google Scholar
Menges, Karl Heinrich
1968Die Tungusischen Sprachen [Handbuch der Orientalistik 1. Der Nahe und der Mittlere Osten 5. Altaistik 3. Tungusologie]. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
1975Altajische Studien, II. Japanisch und Altajisch [Abhandlungen für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 41(3)]. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
1984Korean and Altaic. A preliminary sketch. Central Asiatic Journal 28: 234–295.Google Scholar
Miestamo, Matti
2005Standard Negation: The Negation of Declarative Verbal Main Clauses in a Typological Perspective [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 31]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Miller, Roy Andrew
1971Japanese and the Other Altaic Languages. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1985Altaic connections of the Old Japanese negatives. Central Asiatic Journal 31: 35–84.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Igor V
1994Negation in Evenki. In Typological Studies in Negation [Typological Studies in Language 28], Peter Kahrel & René van den Berg (eds), 1–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina Alekseevna
1999A Grammar of Udehe. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.
Payne, John R
1985Negation. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, 1: Clause Structure, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 197–242. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Poppe, Nicholas
1954Grammar of Written Mongolian. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
1960Vergleichende Grammatik der altaischen Sprachen, 1: Vergleichende Lautlehre [Porta Linguarum Orientalium, Neue Serie 4]. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
1974Zur Stellung des Tschuwaschischen. Central Asiatic Journal 18(2): 135–147.Google Scholar
1977The problem of Uralic and Altaic affinity. Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 58: 221–225.Google Scholar
Ramstedt, Gustaf John
1924Die verneinung in den altaischen Sprachen. Eine semasiologische studie. Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 52: 196–215.Google Scholar
1935Kalmückisches Wörterbuch. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
1939Studies in Korean Etymology. [Mémoires de la Société finno-ougrienne 95.] Helsinki: Suomalai-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
1949Studies in Korean Etymology [Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 95]. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
1952Einführung in die altaische Sprachwissenschaft, II, Formenlehre [Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 104( 2)]. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
Robbeets, Martine
2005Is Japanese Related to Korean, Tungusic, Mongolic and Turkic? [Turcologica 64]. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2013Genealogically motivated grammaticalization. In Shared Grammaticalization: With Special Focus on the Transeurasian Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 132], Martine Robbeets & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 147–175. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanžeev, G.D
1962K voprosu ob otricanii v mongol’skich jazykach. Acta Orientalia Hungarica 15: 273–282.Google Scholar
Starostin, Sergej Anatolevič
1991Altajskaja problema i proisxoždenie japanskogo jazyka. Moscow: Nauk.Google Scholar
Starostin, Sergej, Dybo, Anna & Mudrak, Oleg
2003Etymological Dictionary of the Altaic Languages. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Unger, Jim Marshall
2000Reconciling comparative and internal reconstruction: The case of Old Japanese /ti, ri, ni/. Language 76: 655–681. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vovin, Alexander
2001Japanese, Korean and Tungusic. Evidence for genetic relationship from verbal morphology. In Altaic Affinities, Proceedings of the 40th meeting of the PIAC, Provo, Utah 1997, David B. Honey & David C. Wright (eds), 183–202. Bloomington IN: Indiana University, Research Institute for Inner Asian Studies.Google Scholar
2005The end of the Altaic controversy. Central Asiatic Journal 49: 71–132.Google Scholar
2009A Descriptive and Comparative Grammar of Western Old Japanese, Part 2: Adjectives, Verbs, Adverbs, Conjunctions, Particles, Postpositions [Languages of Asia 8]. Folkestone: Global Oriental.Google Scholar
Whitman, John Bradford
1985The Phonological Basis for the Comparison of Japanese and Korean. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
Willis, David, Lucas, Christopher & Breibarth, Anne
2013Comparing diachronies of negation. In The History of Negation in the Languages of Europe and the Mediterranean, 1: Case Studies [Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics], David Willis, Christopher Lucas & Anne Breibarth (eds) 1–50. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Manzelli, Gianguido

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.