Cover not available
Part of
New Directions in Grammaticalization Research
Edited by Andrew D.M. Smith, Graeme Trousdale and Richard Waltereit
[Studies in Language Companion Series 166] 2015
► pp. 67–92

The lexicalization-grammaticalization-pragmaticalization interface

The case of Mainland Scandinavian jeg tror

ORCID logo | University of Antwerp
This paper reports on a corpus investigation of Mainland Scandinavian expressions meaning ‘I think’ and the lexicalization-grammaticalization-pragmaticalization interface. The discourse marker I think has been subsumed under lexicalization, grammaticalization and pragmaticalization. It can be conceived of as a formulaic token which is an argument in favor of lexicalization. It also has some prototypical properties of grammaticalization, but especially its optional character and syntactic freedom pose serious problems for a grammaticalization analysis. An account in terms of pragmaticalization is controversial because pragmaticalization is not a generally accepted type of language change in grammaticalization studies. I will argue that precisely the ‘problematic’ properties of I think provide good reasons to postulate a separate process of pragmaticalization for the rise of discourse markers.
Published online: 8 April 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.166.04bei
References (43)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 1997. I think - an English modal particle. In Modality in Germanic Languages. Historical and Comparative Perspectives [Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 99], Toril Swan & Olaf Jansen Westvik (eds), 1-47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1983. English Word Formation. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beeching, Kate. 2009. Procatalepsis and the Etymology of Hedging and Boosting Particles. In Current Trends in Diachronic Semantics and Pragmatics, Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Jacqueline Visconti (eds), 81-105. Bingley: Emerald. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beijering, Karin. 2012. Expressions of epistemic modality in Mainland Scandinavian. A study into the lexicalization-grammaticalization-pragmaticalization interface. PhD dissertation, University of Groningen.
Benveniste, Emile. 1966. De la subjectivité dans le langage. In Problèmes de Linguistique Générale, Emile Benveniste (ed.), 258–266. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2005. Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boye, Kasper & Harder, Peter. 2007. Complement-taking predicates: Usage and linguistic structure. Studies in Language 31(3): 569-606. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language 88(1): 1-44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diderichsen, Paul. 1946. Elementær Dansk Grammatik. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2011. Pragmaticalization (defined) as grammaticalization of discourse functions. Linguistics 49(2): 365-390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dostie, Gaétane. 2009. Discourse markers and regional variation in French. A lexico-semantic approach. In Sociolinguistic Variation in Contemporary French [IMPACT: Studies in Language and Society 26], Kate Beeching, Nigel Armstrong & Françoise Gadet (eds), 201-214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erman, Britt & Kotsinas, Ulla-Britt. 1993. Pragmaticalization: The case of ba’ and you know . Studier i Modern Språkvetenskap N. S. 10 [Stockholm Studies in Modern Philology, n.s. 10], 76-93. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
Field, Andy. 2005. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 2007. The development of English parentheticals: A case of grammaticalization? In Tracing English Through Time: Explorations in Language Variation [Austrian Studies in English 95], Ute Smit, Stefan Dollinger, Julia Hüttner, Gunther Kaltenböck & Ursula Lutzky (eds), 99-114. Wien: Braumüller.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga & Rosenbach, Annette. 2000. Introduction. In Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 53], Olga Fischer, Annette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds), 1-37. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gooskens, Charlotte. 2006. Linguistic and extra-linguistic predictors of Inter-Scandinavian intelligibility. In Linguistics in the Netherlands 23, Jeroen van de Weijer & Bettelou Los (eds), 101-113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Günthner, Susanne & Mutz, Katrin. 2004. Grammaticalization vs. pragmaticalization? The development of pragmatic markers in German and Italian. In What Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its Components [Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 158], Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds), 77-107. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K & Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Reh, Mechthild. 1984. Grammaticalization and Reanalysis in African Languages. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2013. On discourse markers: Grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something else? Linguistics 51(6): 1205-1247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2004. Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In What Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its Components [Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 158], Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds), 21-42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1975. The evolution of grammatical categories. Esquisses Linguistiques 2: 38-54.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1912. L’évolution des forms grammaticales. Scientia 12: 384-400.Google Scholar
Norde, Muriel. 2009. Degrammaticalization. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Lehmann’s parameters revisited. In Grammaticalization and Language Change: New Reflections [Studies in Language Companion Series 130], Kristin Davidse, Tine Breban, Lieselotte Brems & Tanja Mortelmans (eds), 73-110. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norde, Muriel & Beijering, Karin. 2012. Facing interfaces: a clustering approach to grammaticalization and related changes. Folia Linguistica 48(2): 385–424. DOI logo
Nuyts, Jan. 2001. Epistemic Modality, Language, and Conceptualization. A Cognitive Pragmatic Perspective [Human Cognitive Processing 5]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ocampo, Francisco. 2006. Movement towards discourse is not grammaticalization: The evolution of claro from adjective to discourse particle in spoken Spanish. In Selected Proceedings of the 9th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, Nuria Sagarra & Almeida Jacqueline Toribio (eds), 308-319. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Onodera, Noriko. 1995. Diachronic analysis of Japanese discourse markers. In Historical Pragmatics, Andreas Jucker (ed.), 393-437. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Platzack, Christer. 1998. Svenskans inre Grammatik – det Minimalistiska Programmet. En Introduktion till Modern Generativ Grammatik. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Mulac, Anthony. 1991. A quantitative perspective on the grammaticalization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In Approaches to Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 19:2], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 313-329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1982. From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: Some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Perspectives on Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 24], Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds), 245-271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Subjectification in grammaticalisation. In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation, Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds), 31-54. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Grammaticalization. In The Continuum Companion to Historical Linguistics, Silvia Luraghi & Vit Bubenik (eds), 271-285. London: Continuum Press.Google Scholar
. 2010a. (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization [Topics in English Linguistics 66], Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 29-71. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard B. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Urmson, James O. 1952. Parenthetical verbs. Mind 61: 480-496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Bogaert, Julie. 2010. A constructional taxonomy of I think and related expressions: Accounting for the variability of complement-taking mental predicates. English Language and Linguistics 14(3): 399-427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wischer, Ilse. 2000. Grammaticalization versus lexicalization – “methinks” there is some confusion. In Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 53], Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds), 355-370. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.