References (33)
Corpora
BNK: Bulgarian National Corpus. Institute for Bulgarian language, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. <[URL]>
CNK: Czech National Corpus – SYN2009PUB. Institute of the Czech National Corpus FF UK, Praha 2010. <[URL]>
GigaFida: Gigafida Reference Corpus of Slovenian. Ministry of Education, Science and Sport, Republic of Slovenia. <[URL]>
NKJP : Przepiórkowski, Adam, Banko, Miroslaw, Górski, Rafał & Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara (eds). 2012. Narodowy Korpus Jezyka Polskiego. PWN, Warsaw. <[URL]>Google Scholar
ParaSol : von Waldenfels, Ruprecht & Meyer, Roland. 2006-. ParaSol, a Parallel Corpus of Slavic and Other Languages. Bern. <[URL]>
RNC: Russian National Corpus. <[URL]>
References
Barentsen, Adrian. 2003. O pobuditel’nyx konstrukcijax s ispolnitelem 1-go lica, 1–33. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Buzássyová, Klára & Jarošová, Alexandra (eds). 2006. Slovník súcasného slovenského jazyka, A-G. Bratislava: Veda.Google Scholar
Derksen, Rick. 2008. Etymological Dictionary of the Slavic Inherited Lexicon [Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series 4]. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederike. 1991. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. The Changing Languages of Europe. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Janjuševic, Ana. 2009. Inkluzivni imperativ u srpskom jeziku. Srpski Jezik – Studije Srpske i Slovenske 14(1–2): 361–374.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1982. Thoughts on grammaticalization [Arbeitspapiere des Seminars für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Erfurt 9]. Erfurt, rev. edn. <[URL]>
. 2002. New reflections on grammaticalization and lexicalization. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Lord, Carol, Yap, Foong Ha & Iwasaki, Shoichi. 2002. Grammaticalization of ‘give’: African and Asian perspectives. InNew Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 217–235. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. 1976. Kausativkonstruktionen [Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 4]. Tübingen: TBL.Google Scholar
Newman, John. 1996. Give. A Cognitive Linguistic Study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pennanen, Esko V. 1986. On the so-called curative verbs in Finnish. Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen 47(2–3): 163–182.Google Scholar
Scholze, Lenka. 2007. Das grammatische System der obersorbischen Umgangssprache unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Sprachkontakts. PhD dissertation, University of Konstanz.
Spieß, Gunter. 2002. Niedersorbisch. In Wieser Enzyklopädie des europäischen Ostens, Bd. 10: Lexikon der Sprachen des europäischen Ostens, Miloš Okuka Gerald Krenn (eds), 323–342. Klagenfurt: Wieser Verlag.Google Scholar
Toops, Gary H. 1985. Grammatival Causativity in Slavic. PhD dissertation, Yale University.
. 1989. The syntax and semantics of Lithuanian curative constructions. In The Non-Slavic Languages of the USSR. Linguistic Studies, Howard I. Aronson (ed.), 249–282. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
. 1992. Causativity in Czech: The verbs dá(va)t and nech(áv)at. Canadian Slavonic Papers 34(1–2): 39–56.Google Scholar
. 1993. Causative constructions in the Upper Sorbian literary language. Die Welt der Slaven 4: 102–136.Google Scholar
. 2012. Causative constructions in colloquial vs. literary Upper Sorbian. Die Welt der Slaven 57: 322–332.Google Scholar
Topolinska, Zuzanna. 1993. The verb dać/dawać in Polish periphrastic constructions. In Studies in Polish Morphology and Syntax, Gerd Hentschel & Roman Laskowski (eds), 229–249. Munich: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
Toporišic, Jože. 2000. Slovenska slovnica, 4th edn. Maribor: Obzorja.Google Scholar
Vykypel, Bohumil & Rabus, Achim. 2011. From giving to existence: on one remarkable grammaticalization pathway. Linguistica Brunensia 59: 183–187.Google Scholar
von Waldenfels, Ruprecht. 2012. The Grammaticalization of ‘Give’ + Infinitive. A Comparative Study of Russian, Polish and Czech [Trends in Linguistics 256]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xrakovskij, Viktor S. & Volodin, Aleksandr P. 1986. Semantika i tipologija imperativa. Russkij imperativ. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Žagar Szentesi, Orsolya. 2011. Funkcionalne varijante konstrukcije dati (se) + infinitiv u hrvatskom jeziku – u okviru gramatikalizacije. Suvremena Lingvistika 37(72): 295–318. <[URL]>Google Scholar