Part of
Causation, Permission, and Transfer: Argument realisation in GET, TAKE, PUT, GIVE and LET verbs
Edited by Brian Nolan, Gudrun Rawoens and Elke Diedrichsen
[Studies in Language Companion Series 167] 2015
► pp. 295325
References (37)
References
Agresti, Alan. 2007. An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis, 2nd edn. Hoboken NJ: John Wiley and Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asher, Ronald E. & Kumari, T.C. 1997. Malayalam. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bernard, Lou (ed.). 2007. Reference Guide for the British National Corpus (XML Edition). Published by Research Technologies Service at Oxford University Computing Services. <[URL]> (12 October 2013)Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan & Reppen, Randi. 1998. Corpus Linguistics. Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 2000. Give and person suppletion. LINGUIST List 11.1166. <[URL]> (12 October 2013).Google Scholar
. 2003. Recipient person suppletion in the verb ‘give’. In Language and Life. Essays in Memory of Kenneth L Pike, Mary Ruth Wise, Thomas N. Headland & Ruth Brend (eds), 265–281. Dallas TX: SIL International and The University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Creider, Chet A. & Creider, Jane Tapsubei. 1989. A Grammar of Nandi. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2004–. BYU-BNC (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press). <[URL]> (15 April 2014).
. 2008–. The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990–present. <[URL]> (15 April 2014).
Dixon, Robert M.W. 1991. A New Approach to English Grammar, on Semantic Principles. New York and Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2005. A Semantic Approach to English Grammar, 2nd edn. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Gahl, Susanne & Garnsey, Susan M. 2004. Knowledge of grammar, knowledge of usage. Syntactic probabilities affect pronunciation variation. Language 80(4): 748–775. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Knowledge of grammar includes knowledge of syntactic probabilities. Language 82(2): 405–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gahl, Susanne, Jurafsky, Dan & Roland, Douglas. 2004. Verb subcategorization frequencies: American English corpus data, methodological studies, and cross-corpus comparisons. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 36: 432–443. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan Thomas. 2006. Exploring variability within and between corpora. Some methodological considerations. Corpora 1(2): 109–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013a. Statistics for Linguistics with R. A Practical Introduction. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013b. Basic significance testing. In Research Methods in Linguistics, Robert J. Podesva & Devyani Sharma (eds), 316–336. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth L. 1972. A new perspective on American Indian linguistics. In New Perspectives on the Pueblos, Alfonso Ortiz (ed.), 87–103. Albuquerque NM: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam, Rychly, Pavel, Smrz, Pavel & Tugwell, David. 2004. The Sketch Engine. Proceedings of EURALEX 2004, Lorient, France, 105–116. <[URL]> (12 October 2013).Google Scholar
Knowles, Gerry & Don, Zuraidah Mohd. 2004. The notion of a “lemma”. Headwords, roots and lexical sets. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9: 69–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N. 1971. Meaning and the English Verb. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Manning, Christopher D. 2003. Probabilistic syntax. In Probabilistic Linguistics, Rens Bod, 
Jennifer Hay & Stefanie Jannedy (eds), 289–341. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Newman, John. 1996. Give. A Cognitive Linguistic Study [Cognitive Linguistics Research 7]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2005. Three-place predicates. A cognitive linguistic perspective. Language Sciences 27: 145–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newman, John & Rice, Sally. 2006. Transitivity schemas of English eat and drink in the BNC. In Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics. Corpus-based Approaches to Syntax and Lexis, Stefan Thomas Gries & Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds), 225–260. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. 2014. R. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Reesink, Ger. 2013. Expressing the GIVE event in Papuan languages. A preliminary survey. Linguistic Typology 17(2): 217–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scheibman, Joanne. 2001. Local patterns of subjectivity in person and verb type in American English conversation. In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure [Typological Studies in Language 45], Joan Bybee & Paul Hopper (eds), 61–89. Amsterdam: John 
Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Point of View and Grammar. Structural Patterns of Subjectivity in American English Conversation [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 11]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, Robert M.W. Dixon (ed.), 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John. 1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Gries, Stefan Thomas. 2003. Collostructions. Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2): 209–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tao, Hongyin. 2001. Discovering the usual with corpora: The case of remember. In Corpus Linguistics in North America: Selections from the 1999 Symposium, Rita C. Simpson & John Swales (eds), 116–114. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. and Mulac, Anthony. 1991. A quantitative perspective on the grammaticization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. II: Focus on Types of Grammatical Markers [Typological Studies in Language 19], 
Elisabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 313–329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 1998. One child’s early talk about possession. In The Linguistics of Giving [Typological Studies in Language 36], John Newman (ed.), 349–373. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Lier, Eva. 2012. Referential effects on the expression of three-participant events across languages. An introduction in memory of Anna Siewierska. Linguistic Discovery 10(3). <[URL]> (12 October 2013). DOI logoGoogle Scholar