Part of
Language Contact and Change in the Americas: Studies in honor of Marianne Mithun
Edited by Andrea L. Berez-Kroeker, Diane M. Hintz and Carmen Jany
[Studies in Language Companion Series 173] 2016
► pp. 219246
References (10)
References
Givón, T. 1971. Historical syntax and synchronic morphology: An archaeologist's field trip. CLS 7. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
. 1979. On Understanding Grammar. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 2011. Ute Reference Grammar [Culture and Language Use. Studies in Anthropological Linguistics 3]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Valence of complex verbs in Ute: In search of generality. Paper presented at the Seminario de Complejidad Syntáctica , Universidad de Sonora, Hermosillo, November 2012. Ms.
. 2013. Ute Texts [Culture and Language Use. Studies in Anthropological Linguistics 7]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Hunnemeyer, Friederieke &Claudi, Ulrike .1991. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd &Kuteva, Tania .2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elisabeth Closs & Heine, Bernd. 1991. Approaches to Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 19(1-2)]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Stephen. 1999. Co-Verbs and Complex Predicates in Wagiman. Stanford University CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Zipf, George K. 1935. The Psycho-Biology of Language. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar